Click here to Skip to main content
15,912,204 members

Survey Results

Are users getting Dumber?   [Edit]

Survey period: 5 Nov 2001 to 11 Nov 2001

As software developers we must ensure our applications are easy to use for the general user. Sometimes though we just don't get it right. Is it us, or is it them?

OptionVotes% 
Users are getting lazier6210.42
There are more users and the average computer literacy is going down18030.25
Users are more demanding.13222.18
Programmers are getting lazier making it hard for the user345.71
Programmers have always been bad at user interfaces.7712.94
Programmers are getting smarter, so users have an easier time345.71
Users are getting better overall305.04
Users are smart, courteous and wonderful people. No, really.183.03

View optional text answers (30 answers)


 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Christian Graus5-Nov-01 10:49
protectorChristian Graus5-Nov-01 10:49 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Wilka10-Nov-01 3:42
Wilka10-Nov-01 3:42 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Michael P Butler5-Nov-01 9:37
Michael P Butler5-Nov-01 9:37 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Tim Smith5-Nov-01 10:21
Tim Smith5-Nov-01 10:21 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Christian Graus5-Nov-01 10:43
protectorChristian Graus5-Nov-01 10:43 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
#realJSOP6-Nov-01 3:52
professional#realJSOP6-Nov-01 3:52 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Paul Watson6-Nov-01 4:19
sitebuilderPaul Watson6-Nov-01 4:19 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
#realJSOP6-Nov-01 7:43
professional#realJSOP6-Nov-01 7:43 
> I say it because VB is inherently a more UI focused tool than C++.

It only makes *creating* the UI easier. It does NOT promote good design.

> Tell me this; If two graphic designers came to you for a job. One said he
> uses Adobe Photoshop and the other says he uses Jasc Paint Shop Pro. I will
> take a bet you will instantly put the first designer on a higher pedestal
> than the second as there choice of tools reflects their level of experience
> and talent.

It depends on which program my company is using. This particular example is irrelevant to the discussion.

> If someone said to you "hey I am writing an OS in VB" you would just laugh
> your head off. If they said "hey I am writing an OS in C++" you would
> probably give them the thumbs up and respect them.

No, I'd ask them why they don't find something more constructive to do.

> VB focuses on the UI a lot more. The first thing you are presented with in
> VB is a bleeding form designer, a UI designer! MS hype VB's UI creation
> abilities no end.

It only makes *creating* the UI easier. It does NOT promote good design.

> Not only that but I have heard it over and over again on CP that VB is a
> great prototyping and UI design tool.

That's because it makes it easier to create a UI that can be quickly modified. Once the prototype is done, the real programmers take over and move it to C++.

>> There are some programmers that are great at coming up with a decent UI,
>> some that aren't as good, some that are average, and some that suck.
>
> No sh*t John. There are great drivers, mediocre drivers and crap drivers.
> Great drivers tend to drive great cars.

I'm a great driver (raced a 1965 Mustang Fastback in vintage trans am and slalom events, and even turned a couple hundred laps in a Winston Cup stockcar). I drive a Buick Park Avenue Ultra (a great car), but it's not because I'm a great driver - it's because I'm a great UI designer and programmer, and I command a salary that lets me afford a $40,000 luxury sedan.

> UI designers do not tend to use C++ for coming up with great UI's. Good UI
> designers do not have their heads in reams of pointers, structs, objects
> etc. etc. etc. They think of people, colours, shapes, forms etc.

That's what I've been trying to drill into your head this whole time. But if they want a decent UI implemented, they call in real programmers (the C++ guys).

> I would say a great UI designer probably is not a hot shot programmer.

Then your view of the world is even narrower than mine.

> Have a look at websites created by programmers, then have a look at
> websites created by designers.

I'm a programmer, and I think my website looks peachy (and it works).

> The first lot look terrible but work well. The second lot look incredible
> but often don't work that well.
>
> I agree there are some people who are gifted in programming and design but
> they don't come along everyday.

So, the people that have hired me as a programmer are part of that lucky few who have seen greatness.

> Anyways my belief stands that on average a VB programmer will have better
> UI skills than a C++ programmer...

That's still a crock of sh*t, Paul.

> ...while a C++ programmers are on average better programmers.

But this is oh-so-true.


The whole point you're missing is that the user interface is completely based on the target audience. If your target audience is a bunch of propeller heads, you can stick to the Windows standard for interface components, and beyond logical placement of menu items and use of dialog boxes, you don't have much to worry about. I personally CANNOT STAND fluffy dialog boxes or non-standard user interfaces because then, things become hard to find. WinAMP is a good example of a fluffy design that doesn' do ANYTHING for the usability of the program.

Finally, as a group, VB programmers are neither more or less adept at designing a decent UI than are C++ programmers.



"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Stan Shannon7-Nov-01 6:54
Stan Shannon7-Nov-01 6:54 
GeneralRe: Of course (one more snippy VB remark and I will loose it) Pin
Michael P Butler8-Nov-01 3:38
Michael P Butler8-Nov-01 3:38 
GeneralRe: Of course Pin
Michael P Butler4-Nov-01 22:53
Michael P Butler4-Nov-01 22:53 
GeneralRe: Of course Pin
Nish Nishant5-Nov-01 0:37
sitebuilderNish Nishant5-Nov-01 0:37 
GeneralRe: Of course Pin
Paul Watson5-Nov-01 5:00
sitebuilderPaul Watson5-Nov-01 5:00 
GeneralRe: Of course Pin
Michael P Butler5-Nov-01 5:19
Michael P Butler5-Nov-01 5:19 
GeneralRe: Of course Pin
Stan Shannon5-Nov-01 5:21
Stan Shannon5-Nov-01 5:21 
GeneralRe: Of course Pin
Ravi Bhavnani5-Nov-01 9:33
professionalRavi Bhavnani5-Nov-01 9:33 
Generalseems like... Pin
Nish Nishant4-Nov-01 18:12
sitebuilderNish Nishant4-Nov-01 18:12 
GeneralRe: seems like... Pin
Michael P Butler4-Nov-01 22:51
Michael P Butler4-Nov-01 22:51 
GeneralRe: seems like... Pin
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe5-Nov-01 1:22
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe5-Nov-01 1:22 
GeneralRe: seems like... Pin
5-Nov-01 5:30
suss5-Nov-01 5:30 
GeneralRe: seems like... Pin
Jim A. Johnson5-Nov-01 5:20
Jim A. Johnson5-Nov-01 5:20 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.