|
Perhaps you would care to remove the stick from your butt and learn a bit of empathy. How do you know that they haven't Googled? Perhaps they haven't found the right keywords - even giving them a Google link showing the keywords is a better answer than just kicking their question off. It's an arrogant approach and is one of the reasons I don't help in QA - the arrogance of the people in there who seem to be obsessed by their "expert" ranking is, quite frankly, disgusting. To my mind, this goes against the whole spirit of the site which was originally designed to be helpful and welcoming.
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent reply, I couldn't agree more.
|
|
|
|
|
I completely agree with you.
I should really think @chris-maunder should take a call on such trigger happy response.
Newbie should feel welcome and should learn from community. A proper comment or reply will go a long way than nuking it,
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: learn a bit of empathy
I don't need your advise. Keep it with you.
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: How do you know that they haven't Googled?
After reading the question,one can easily figure out the same.
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: this goes against the whole spirit of the site which was originally designed to be helpful and welcoming
And that is something which has made quality of QA worse.
Cool down. You are not judge or Admin.Advise someone whenever they act against Codeproject guidelines. You are free to give your opinion,not to order someone aggressively. This is community site and everyone is free to use the functionalities provided by Site Admins. Bill has expressed his opinion and let the Admins think over it. If they decide to make changes in reporting mechanism,we will follow that also. Before asking me to learn something, learn how to express something. Blaming someone for not helping in QA is not quite appropriate.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
I think a more proper response to Pete would have been - no response. I am pretty sure he has more wisdom than you, in such matters, and has been with this site far longer than you.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: more wisdom than you, in such matters, and has been with this site far longer than you
So what? The point is, advise should always be polite. And even in this topic advise was not ncessary. I report what i think should be reported. If you think something should be reported,report it. Its in noway against the guidelines. Now,if someone feels that i should follow his/her thoughts,that won't be the case. If you are member since a long time doesn't mean you respond to anyone aggressively.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Well said. I am sure that many of the people here, agree with you. 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rohan,
Please be assured that you and Tadit both have my respect, and appreciation for your contributions. I now regret mentioning you and Tadit by name.
I think this is a structural problem in QA: some posts are so clearly "gimme code" or "homework" that they virtually "beg" to be deleted.
The terse version of what I see as the "structural" problem: number of #1 votes is a weak metric for a decision to remove the OP and all comments and solutions.
But, there are others, as in the post I responded to, where my intuition suggests there just might be someone on the other end of the question ... perhaps someone struggling to communicate in English ... who could benefit from a little guidance, or encouragement.
So, there's a subjective judgement call involved; honestly, I think I've had a long enough experience teaching and writing about programming to make that call ... of course, I will make mistakes. I'd like to think that even in my mistakes I might leave something valuable to someone else "behind me" 
The other benefit I've experienced, at times, from extending myself a bit on a dicey question is that other CP members come along and give me some feedback that teaches me something new, or causes me to re-evaluate my assumptions ... or post other answers that show techniques I've never seen before.
I know that if I see a CP MVP who has taken the time to give a thoughtful reply, I will never vote to close the question. That there is one CP MVP who not only gives "un-thoughtful" answers, but, at the same time votes the post #1 ... who I won't name ... well, I'm not going to let that distract me.
I hope you and Tadit will know that I offer my views here without any animus towards you.
cheers, Bill
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
Strongly agree with your point.
I mostly leave question without reporting it when i see some answers there,but in this case when i reported it your answer was not there. I respect your concern over this matter and sorry for the inconvenience.
Practically, this problem can be solved in a way that whenever there are answers Question can't be deleted. That's the only solution IMO.
BillWoodruff wrote: I hope you and Tadit will know that I offer my views here without any animus towards you.
Sure.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
|
This has been raised many times and the answer has been the same all along. Right now, the mandatory commenting is not going to be applied. This may change in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, fine but on what basis downvoted.? we should know, right. Then only we can try to avoid those mistakes.
--------------------------------------------
Mark this post as answer if it helps you!!!
Regards
Naveen Sanagasetti
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes people just downvote because they can. It's called trolling. Adding a textbox isn't going to fix that - other than them creating a fake account and entering rubbish in the box.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your suggestion.
--------------------------------------------
Mark this post as answer if it helps you!!!
Regards
Naveen Sanagasetti
|
|
|
|
|
I have an idea...
Instead of forcing a comment, have a check list of standard reasons, like so:
<br />
Check all that apply (you must select at least one):<br />
[ ] Technically incorrect<br />
[ ] Insufficient content<br />
[ ] Formatting issues<br />
[ ] No downloadable file<br />
[ ] Missing images<br />
[ ] Article is not in English<br />
[ ] Your attempt at English is comical<br />
[ ] I don't like your name<br />
[ ] I don't like your attitude<br />
[ ] I'm a low-rep down-voting prick<br />
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
 Worth a 5 just for the last one.
|
|
|
|
|
One of my fears in life is you'll grow mellow with age, John.
Never let that happen.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
At this point, I don't think that's even possible.
However some would say I have because the last item didn't include the work "f*ckin'" (mellowed for our overly sensitive audience that are worried about whether their next set of man panties should be yellow or pink and include a little lace").
EDIT ==========
I just realized that I might be more Australian than you.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 7-Oct-15 14:44pm.
|
|
|
|
|
My vote of 1:
asdömas öföä
or not voting.
In my opinion I prefer to receive some negative votes without explanation from time to time, than to have overrated contributions and messages overall just because there is people wanting to remain unknown if they downvote, so they just don't vote or give a 3 instead a 1.
Other aspect are vote-wars.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice to here thanks for your suggestions.
--------------------------------------------
Mark this post as answer if it helps you!!!
Regards
Naveen Sanagasetti
|
|
|
|
|
Naveen.Sanagasetti wrote: we should know, right.
No, it just leads to flame wars, and people crying to Chris like ...
Naveen.Sanagasetti wrote: Then only we can try to avoid those mistakes.
You can do that by reading other people's replies, and learning from the good ones (and your own mistakes).
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your suggestion.
--------------------------------------------
Mark this post as answer if it helps you!!!
Regards
Naveen Sanagasetti
|
|
|
|
|
Creating HTML tables with JavaScript/DOM methods[^]
First of all, it must not be an Article. At max,its Tip/Trick. Even i personally don't consider it as Tip/Trick because it is very very basic that you create xyz elements with HTML. He only wrote few lines about insertrow and insertcell.
Further he writes,
Gerd Wagner wrote : Please help me in spreading the words: upvote my StackOverflow article which was downvoted by developers ignoring the progress that was made in recent years in web standards.
I'm unable to understand this. Is this acceptable? Posting something just for getting votes on my Article(They consider it Article,we call it Answer! ) is acceptable practice? I think it should not be. I'm shocked to know that it has one approved version also.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: This was originally a blog, I found the image that was a broken link, fixed it and the submission wizard tagged it as an article, can we fix this? -Paul
Found this in the submission comments - Retagged it as Blog and released it into the wild again.
Furthermore removed the spam-ish bit.
Post sciptum
Hey @Sean-Ewington & @Chris-Maunder
I can't seem to be able to change the type to "Technical Blog" (which it originally was), can you help out?
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: First of all, it must not be an Article. At max,its Tip/Trick. Even i personally don't consider it as Tip/Trick because it is very very basic that you create xyz elements with HTML. He only wrote few lines about insertrow and insertcell.
The item was accidentally reclassified as article during a content update. Sean and Chris are at it.
Rohan Leuva wrote: I'm unable to understand this. Is this acceptable? Posting something just for getting votes on my Article(They consider it Article,we call it Answer! ) is acceptable practice? I think it should not be. I'm shocked to know that it has one approved version also.
I removed this bit already.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
