|
Is there a specific reason this forum is kind of "hidden" and not part of the navigation list of the other forums?
There are several "reports" of articles rather being tip/tricks here (or other issues) that don't get discussed or being acted upon by enough members to change anything. Which would probably be different if this forum wasn't hidden like it is.
I'm aware that this forum requires a certain reputation to be accessible but that should also be possible to implement in the navigation list. Has this been discussed already or would it be a sensible suggestion in Bugs&Sugs?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I agree that it's pretty hidden and should be more visible. I think having a "Moderators' Forum" icon left to your name in the top bar (if you have enough rep) would work to send more traffic here. (And it probably should be hide-able so people can hide it if they don't like to have it there)
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm certain it's because the automated blog-pulling fails to filter it out (or maybe doesn't even attempt to). I'm constantly clicking the "Format/Layout issues" option when moderating but apparently others don't see it or don't bother, so the author doesn't get prompted to remove it. But as it's not a working link/script any more I don't think it's critical. Maybe you could make a suggestion in Bugs&Sugs to improve the blog-pulling to handle this.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like he has friends too....
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
It's a Tip now.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type Safety in .NET[^] is listed in the March "Everything Else" article contest.
I think it is at best a tip.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, Are these members really abusive/ spammer ?
-> Laz Hack Fauker
-> Mr Javaman
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please post a link to them?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would they be abusive? I don't see anything wrong.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The user might have deleted his message after he posted it. But it does not look abusive to me.
Bharath K A wrote: Also, look at this. I am not sure why this normal message is voted down.
I have no idea why it's downvoted, and who downvoted it.
Bharath K A wrote: Also, at times, votes and messages show up and then quickly disappear (?)
Might be due to caching. Also, sometimes a message does not immediately appear, when it needs to go through message moderation because CP's filter saw it as spam/abusive. If it's not spam/abusive, the Protectors can approve it.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
That's right, I am with you. These are normal messages but somehow voted down:
example 1[^]
example 2[^]
Also, the other email message I posted earlier looks normal. Not anything wrong to filter
|
|
|
|
|
Normal users cannot see who downvoted; sometimes random downvotes like this happen. Not very much to do about it, but also not very harmful.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
This question [^] looks like a request to help violating copyrights (and the integrity) of another product.
- Michael Haephrati מיכאל האפרתי
|
|
|
|
|
|
This message[^] contains an un-linked URL for a broken site - the default page is completely blank. The message reads like site-driving spam.
His other two messages, both in the same thread, sound slightly dodgy, but don't appear to contain any links.
Spiced ham or harmless?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It is spam. Its a clear case of advertisement.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] person has created his account just to downvote other articles.
By looking into his comments, I suspect, it is his secondary account which he uses only to downvote others. Although some of his message make sense. He might not be using his primary account for this purpose fearing about poor reply and reputation points. (In my opinion)
Should we call him spammer too?
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
Spam=Advertising. There are no ads,so not a spammer.
So far, it looks like there is nothing to report as only 9 messages from him. I am having close eye on him now.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Although I see your point... 9 messages in 11 years... that is quite few to be considered something punishable.
Coward? (if you are right)... yes
abusive?... not really.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest,most of his post made sense. He is just a critic but a useful one
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
