|
Why would they be abusive? I don't see anything wrong.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The user might have deleted his message after he posted it. But it does not look abusive to me.
Bharath K A wrote: Also, look at this. I am not sure why this normal message is voted down.
I have no idea why it's downvoted, and who downvoted it.
Bharath K A wrote: Also, at times, votes and messages show up and then quickly disappear (?)
Might be due to caching. Also, sometimes a message does not immediately appear, when it needs to go through message moderation because CP's filter saw it as spam/abusive. If it's not spam/abusive, the Protectors can approve it.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
That's right, I am with you. These are normal messages but somehow voted down:
example 1[^]
example 2[^]
Also, the other email message I posted earlier looks normal. Not anything wrong to filter
|
|
|
|
|
Normal users cannot see who downvoted; sometimes random downvotes like this happen. Not very much to do about it, but also not very harmful.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
This question [^] looks like a request to help violating copyrights (and the integrity) of another product.
- Michael Haephrati מיכאל האפרתי
|
|
|
|
|
|
This message[^] contains an un-linked URL for a broken site - the default page is completely blank. The message reads like site-driving spam.
His other two messages, both in the same thread, sound slightly dodgy, but don't appear to contain any links.
Spiced ham or harmless?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It is spam. Its a clear case of advertisement.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] person has created his account just to downvote other articles.
By looking into his comments, I suspect, it is his secondary account which he uses only to downvote others. Although some of his message make sense. He might not be using his primary account for this purpose fearing about poor reply and reputation points. (In my opinion)
Should we call him spammer too?
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
Spam=Advertising. There are no ads,so not a spammer.
So far, it looks like there is nothing to report as only 9 messages from him. I am having close eye on him now.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Although I see your point... 9 messages in 11 years... that is quite few to be considered something punishable.
Coward? (if you are right)... yes
abusive?... not really.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest,most of his post made sense. He is just a critic but a useful one
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] should be better off as a tip not an article.
Type changed now
modified 25-Jan-15 4:05am.
|
|
|
|
|
it is a tip/trick
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the type was changed within few days after posting this  I'll change the title
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] person is posting spam messages.
1[^]
2[^]
Please stop him.
modified 7-Jan-15 3:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sure will take care of it next time.
|
|
|
|
|
Two and a half years ago, this user[^] was kicked off the site for asking about writing a virus. After promising not to ask again[^], Chris reinstated his account.
Today, he posted this question[^]:
Esmaeil Ebrahimi wrote:
most of time i set some config on windows 7 for our customers like below :
- turn off windows firewall
- turn off all message in action center
- turn off windows update
- add special language
- set some settings in region and language
and ...
how i can create application that do this works with only one click .
1- work with registry ?
2- work with command prompt
3- or another way ?
Maybe I'm being paranoid, but writing software which turns off Windows Updates, Windows Firewall, and all Action Centre messages with one click sounds suspiciously like malware to me.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
An article that was highlighted in the code project newsletter two months ago, and which has become quite popular has suddenly disappeared in a puff of smoke without a trace as far as I can see.
Any take on this? I know that one should not depend on anything being forever but this is ridiculous
ASP.NET MVC.Template introduction[^]
should probably be in another forum. sorry.
modified 28-Dec-14 5:41am.
|
|
|
|
|
If it was deleted for a reason, you should have received a notification. Supposing that was the case and quickly looking at the article I'm not sure what that reason could have been ...
Article restored.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, yes, no notifications or messages ... just gone. Thanks for restoring. We'll see what happens next
|
|
|
|
|
The below one is published as an article. Though I had mentioned the in comments for improvements, this one is explicitly published.
ASP.NET MVC5 authentication using custom UserStore.[^]
What is the point of having a low quality article ? instead it could have been a tip as I had mentioned earlier.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
The one JSOP mentioned in the Lounge[^]
He's voting without comment. Then when people challenge him he's often saying, "Hey it's just my opinion & I don't have to justify it". Sometimes he does justify it, sometimes he doesn't. He's occasionally upvoted as well, so I'm not just reporting everything. My guess is he is somebody's sockpuppet with a beef against the voting system and trying to show it as ridiculous. He seems to know that there is a purpose to having a message - he even says "Anything 3 and under needs a comment" in one post, yet he tries to circumvent it.
[Edit]
I'm going troll & have stopped feeding. He's pretty witless TBH.
Some hyperlinks for waverers:
Rudimentary ViewModel Class Generator[^]
Rudimentary ViewModel Class Generator[^]
Rudimentary ViewModel Class Generator[^]
Rudimentary ViewModel Class Generator[^]
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
modified 19-Dec-14 12:00pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
