|
Howzit now?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
 Consistent in all 4 browsers. No funky centering.
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion: I thought that's wrong way and it looks different on other browser(firefox).
|
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I made some minor changes in my article and when attempting to submit the changes get this message:
Error: Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.. Ticket: 4229261. Server: Web24
modified on Monday, February 28, 2011 6:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
| +1
Without darkness, there are no dreams.
-Karla Kuban
|
|
|
|
|
True, but there are also nightmares...
|
|
|
|
|
During updates sometimes the servers get indigestion. Should be good now. Sorry about that.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I like the new functionality of HTML being included in quotes. However, it acts funny sometimes. For example, emoticons (like  ) are quoted using their HTML (e.g., <IMG alt=Smile align=top src="/script/Forums/Images/smiley_smile.gif">). That's even worse than the old behavior (which I think just skipped over emoticons or used their alt text). Also, in the HTML above, "Smile" and "top" should be in quotes (not sure if it was the quoting that removed that or if that's how the HTML actually looks).
|
|
|
|
|
The HTML we retrieved was thanks to your browser. Blame it for missing quotes.
I've stripped image tags from the quoted text.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Very nice. If you are already doing that, then why not use the alt text to replace the IMG tag with the emoticon? So if you see "alt='Smile'", replace the image tag with:
:)
|
|
|
|
|
A small, innocent part of me hoped you would not think of that. "It works" it said to itself. "It's better than it's ever been" it it said hopefully. "Surely they won't ask for yet more?" it asked, delusionally.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not even seeing that.
I just tried quoting your post above and this is what I got:
<blockquote class="FQ"><div class="FQA">AspDotNetDev wrote:</div> (like ) </blockquote>
No HTML, no placeholder text.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, CM already implemented the fix to remove the IMG tag.
|
|
|
|
|
He did it by hacking the feature out, not by reverting the change though. Previously it would put the (now missing) alt text into the message. While OMG wasn't as good as actually putting  into the text it's better than nothing.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: While OMG wasn't as good as actually putting [OMG] into the text it's better than nothing
I've improved the hack a little. It won't insert the correct sequence for all smileys (eg ![Sheep | [baah]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/sheep.gif) ) but it will for the common smiley's ( , etc). For the remaining it will insert a descriptive text placeholder
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I bookmarked this post in the lounge and I am not seeing any points for it: see here.[^]
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
A known issue that will be fixed in the next few minutes
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick fix. Awesome. 
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't search hard enough... 
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed a bug in the styling for the quotes.
If the original text contains a strikeout then the strikeout is removed from the formatting.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: contains a strikeout then
See;
but you can manually add it back in.........
DaveAuld wrote: contains a strikeout then
Should this not inherit from the original text?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Jig | [Dance]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
, ![Heart | [heart]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/love.gif)
, ![Good Stuff | [The good stuff]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/vegemite.gif)
and ![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
secret, but is there really a difference between inserting [mad] and : mad: ?