|
Something has changed? I too like to keep off-line copies of articles I find useful. I have been doing this for years.
Now it doesn't work any more.
Example: http://www.codeproject.com/cs/database/CsvReader.asp
will not save?????
Keith
|
|
|
|
|
I save that page with firefox.
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for checking, it must be a IE <-> CodeProject issue because it worked up until last week....
Keith
|
|
|
|
|
It's the ad server, actually. They're afraid you'll pirate their precious ads. Or, something.
But yeah, that's why the printable version works.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like the ad server is not working rite now, CP looks so clean 
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
|
It works, thank you very much !
Luc
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, it would be really cool if we had an article/area and forum for topics that don't relate to source code but are still technical in nature. I just submitted 7 articles that represent probably 100 hours of work I've done just in preparing them and they are getting low-voted because they are not programming articles. I realize this is "CodeProject" but like I mention in my articles if your network isn't running right and you have code that runs across networks then your code won't work either.
I'd also like to write an article about being self-employed and running your own business. I'm not favorable to doing so though if it's just going to get low-voted and removed. Marc Clifton and I were going to work on something together and if we had a full-fledged place to submit it that would be cool. A lot of regular members here have a lot of questions about this stuff that indirectly relates to what they do. So some expansion categories might be a good thing.
- Rex
I only read cp for the articles.
Iron Speed Designer MVP
Check out my 7 Part Series on Networking[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. A networking and business related forum, would be cool, and a forum for general design, design patterns and UML, that isn't necessarily "code" oriented, would also be cool.
I realize that the number of different forums could get out of control, or might not be very active, so maybe some general ones would suffice.
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
Do any of the categories under the "General Reading" section come close?
|
|
|
|
|
|
code-frog wrote: I'd also like to write an article about being self-employed and running your own business
Before you and Marc produce a final version article, would you be interested in input for ...
Profit & Loss forecasting, Cashflow forecasting, Personal Budgeting and other aspects necessary for a comprehensive business plan.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
code-frog wrote: an article about being self-employed and running your own business
Sounds interesting - I'll keep an eye out for it.
"Nothing ever changes by staying the same." - David Brent (BBC's The Office) ~ ScrollingGrid: A cross-browser 2-way-scrolling freeze-header control for the ASP.NET DataGrid
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
I'd suggest to create some ".NET 1.0/1.1" group for C# articles. This group would contain all articles that are .NET 1.0/1.1-specific, or where only useful at that time.
Why? For example, have a look at this page:
http://www.codeproject.com/cs/miscctrl/[^]
Very many articles. Unfortunately if you're working with .NET 2.0, many of the articles are useless, because .NET 2.0 introduced features that made the articles .NET 1.0/1.1-specific (better alternative ways come with .NET 2.0 directly).
Balloon tooltips can displayed without native methods (old article[^]), button images are supported (old article[^]), etc. etc. etc. Skimming over the article list, I'd say at least 25% of the articles could be moved to the .NET 1.0/1.1-specific group.
Best regards, keep up the good work
Dominik
_outp(0x64, 0xAD);
and
__asm mov al, 0xAD __asm out 0x64, al
do the same... but what do they do?? 
(doesn't work on NT)
|
|
|
|
|
We're working on a slightly different approach that will accomplish the same goal
|
|
|
|
|
I know this happens to everyone - you want to vote a message "good" but you click 1 instead of 5. Then you have to apologize in a reply. How about this instead:
The system keeps track of the last message that you voted on. If you vote for that message again, the new vote is accepted and it replaces the previous vote.
This will let people immediately correct mis-votes. On the database side, it just requires keeping one new int per user to hold the ID of their last-voted-on message.
--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP 
LINKS~! Ericahist | PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, I meant to vote this suggestion 5...
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: I know this happens to everyone
Well call it good karma or just plain luck this has never happened to me.
Money is the root of all evil. For more information, send $10 to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: The system keeps track of the last message that you voted on. If you vote for that message again, the new vote is accepted and it replaces the previous vote.
Is that same with the Monthly Articles voting system?
|
|
|
|
|
The whole voting system's getting reworked.
|
|
|
|
|
How about a mail to link for articles in the same area where you give the option to print?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is for me.
Make sure you have the Category set as 'All Topics' (at the top of the page)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Chris. You're right about that. I assumed that WinFx articles would appear when the search is set to .NET since WinFx was officialy renamed to '.NET 3.0', as I assume you know. Might it be possible to filter in .NET 3.0 articles when the filter is set to '.NET'? Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)