|
However if your constol is being hosted in Internet Explorer - that won't work. 
The "trick" in IE is to find the IHTMLObjectElement that represents your ActiveX control & change it's height / width. This will cause IE to adjust it's layout & resize your ActiveX control's window.
[ Jason De Arte | Toy Maker | 1001010.com ]
|
|
|
|
|
Jason De Arte wrote:
However if your constol is being hosted in Internet Explorer - that won't work
Are you sure ? 
In fact I used this in IE6 and worked fine !!
does this change for other IE versions ?
|
|
|
|
|
I am as certain of that just as I am certain of my ability to spell the most common of words.
constol d'oh!
[ Jason De Arte | Toy Maker | 1001010.com ]
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Sirs,
Would you be so kind as to suggest me how it is possible to make IE Toolbar in your sample multiline. I tried SetRows() but it does not help me(of course I used TBSTYLE_WRAPABLE). I have read similar article here about problems with SetRows() in a simple floating Toolbar, it was solved be resizing parent control (or so?). I also had no luck in this approach. I always getting one line (but seems to me SetRows return correct coordinates as it should be to display the whole toolbar).
By the way, I used cmnctrl1 sample from MSDN and here SetRows works to set 2 lines(but not 3) even without TBSTYLE_WRAPABLE.
Best Regards,
Igor
|
|
|
|
|
I'm mentally preparing myself to start using std::vector instead of C-style arrays when interacting with legacy C APIs like the Win32 API. I mean to use &vec[0] to pass a pointer to a writable buffer to the APIs, but I wonder if &vec.front() is enough (I'd prefer it to be so).
In the std implementation we use (the one by Plauger), &vec[0] and &vec.front() evaluates to the equivalent result. Is it guaranteed to be so, or is one of them preferred over the other in this case?
Thanks for any input!
--
The Blog: Bits and Pieces
|
|
|
|
|
Both formulations are the same, and guaranteed to be so.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwui/html/msdn_subclas3.asp
Note Do not superclass the scroll bar control class because Windows uses the class name to produce the correct behavior for scroll bars.
But I cannot find any special code that handle the scrollbar in ATL.
|
|
|
|
|
You can subclass the scrollbar. Subclassing doesn't affect the class name. The article mentions that superclassing scrollbars don't work.
I.e., create the scrollbar, and then subclass it. See CWindowImpl::SubclassWindow().
retinoscopy wrote:
But I cannot find any special code that handle the scrollbar in ATL.
Scrollbars are usually handled by intercepting WM_HSCROLL and WS_VSCROLL. When the scrollbar is manipulated by the user, it sends either of those messages, depending on its orientation, to its parent window. Windows can be created using the WS_HSCROLL and WS_VSCROLL window styles, which will automatically add scrollbars to the window. This is done by windows itself, and not ATL (MFC nor WTL for that matter).
See this[^] for information about scroll bars, and then take a look at either CWindowImpl::SubclassWindow (to implement a class which handles the subclassing), or see CContainedWindowT[^] (to intercept scroll bar messages in another class' message map).
If you haven't already, take a look at WTL, as it makes windowing with ATL a lot easier.
--
...Coca Cola, sometimes war...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for you timely reply.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have the WTL yet, but I will download it to look into the code.
I wonder why the scrollbar must be handled differently from all other controls, i.e. cannot be superclassed? Suppose that I want to create a scrollbar control and I want intercept all windows messages sent to it, if I cannot superclass it, I have to globally subclass it, otherwise I have to setup some CBT hook before creating the control. If I globally subclass the scrollbar, however, I think I have to undo the subclassing of all scrollbar that are created (just after I globally subclass the scrollbar control) by another threads from some DLLs made by other people.
|
|
|
|
|
retinoscopy wrote:
I don't have the WTL yet, but I will download it to look into the code.
WTL is sort of like MFC, but very much ATLish. WTL provides all the standard controls with CWindow-derived counter parts, as well as a couple of controls implemented in WTL (CWindowImpl-derived). For the most part, the MFC docs are valid.
retinoscopy wrote:
I wonder why the scrollbar must be handled differently from all other controls, i.e. cannot be superclassed?
Probably due to some laziness of a Microsoft hacker  It was probably a tradeoff they made to make some implementation aspect easier.
--
...Coca Cola, sometimes war...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi I've basically created a Class called a Session which uses the STL <vector> container to Add 'Jobs objects'. The Job objects add further record objects.
The class as it stands is working fine.
What i want is to write the Session object to a file.
then the next time the app starts i want to read back in the class data from the file.
What i've tried:
1:
I've played with File Mapping, and it seems fine with structures but when i try it with my class using STL, it falls over.
2:
ofstream using the binary flag. - this seems to write it away ok but i have real trouble reading it back in.
Have you had any experience writing a class object to a file that uses the STL?
thanks in advance
Carl
Assemblysoft.com
|
|
|
|
|
crandall wrote:
Have you had any experience writing a class object to a file that uses the STL?
What I usually do is overload the << operator and use that to write my class data members to the stream. You can do this for a stream or a CArchive if you're blending in MFC. This way you could just add the object in your Serialize() code or just insert it natively to a stream.
~Nitron.
ññòòïðïðB A
start
|
|
|
|
|
1:
If i overloaded the << operator would i be able to achieve something like below?
(might not be completely accurate as just started using fstream rather than fstream.h)
Session s1
s1.DoSomething();
ofstream dataOut(pfileName,ios::binary);
dataOut.write( (char*) &s1,sizeof s1);
dataOut.close();
//On another Day
ifstream fin;
Session *pob;
ifstream fin;
fin.open(pfileName,ios::binary);
fin.read((char*) pob,sizeof(pob));
pob.DoSomething();
fin.close();
2:
With the read in, If the Session contains a vector container of objects of another class, would the sizeof(pob) be correct?
thankyou
Carl
|
|
|
|
|
No, it doesn't work that way. You have to manually store off your data members individually because they are most likely not in a contiguous memory block. If Session was a struct and you were careful of your struct member data alignment, then that could possibly work out OK.
~Nitron.
ññòòïðïðB A
start
|
|
|
|
|
Ok i see how i would do that for the Session class, and i just read an article on transient types which need to be converted to basic types first, but how would i go about storing the items in the vector?
do i store each member of each object by looping through with an iterator?
thanks
Carl
|
|
|
|
|
crandall wrote:
do i store each member of each object by looping through with an iterator?
yup.
~Nitron.
ññòòïðïðB A
start
|
|
|
|
|
Ok so i can't see why i can't get that bit to work.
How about reading it back in? (please don't just say reverse it)
I create an object of the class
Do i then go through and push_back (re create) from my basic types?
Does that mean i need to store the amount of records for later?
STL was supposed to make my life easier - lol
thanks
Carl
|
|
|
|
|
crandall wrote:
(please don't just say reverse it)
Well, you could either store the number of records as you mentioned, or you could just process until you reach eof(). Have a look at my CDataFile class[^] to see how I do it.
~Nitron.
ññòòïðïðB A
start
|
|
|
|
|
thanks a lot for your help
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Todd. I have managed to get this thing working without any testing code but i will definitely look at the code, it seems really good plus i'm not using xml which could be of benefit later. - Cheers
Carl
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I am interested in
creating a standard cookie file from
a .exe application, that will later
be consumed by a intranet
application via the ie browser.
(I'd like to be able to generate
client side cookie files without without actually
running the ie browser).
is this possible from a client side only app (.exe)?
any help is appreciated.
sas
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks. I'll take a peak
now [cookie newbie).
sas
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
