|
hi, when we start windows 2000 (pro, or server) we will place at the login dialog box. we have to press ctrl + alt + del to logon to windows. that dialog box has the picture of logo windows 2000. does anyone know who to change this logo? i want to use my family photo at that login dialog box instead of the microsoft logo.
Roath Kanel
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
I have a device that is that acts as Multiport Communications Port.
Windows XP does not remember the Multiport Communications Port. With Windows 2000, you will only have to go through the process of setting up the device as a Multiport Communications Port once. After that, you can take out the device and put it back in any time and it will remember to recognize the device as a Multiport Communications Port with the same settings. In Windows XP, you will have to install and setup the Multiport Communications Port every time you connect the device to the laptop. 
This also includes every time the machine boots up with the card connected. 
Not only that, but Windows XP will also use a different COM port every time you install it because it thinks the previous COM port it was using is still in use.  You can manually change the COM port back to its previous value in the Multiport Communications Port Properties.
How to work around this? Anybody knows? 
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone help us with this? We're trying to install SQL Server 2000 on a Windows 2003 Server. MSDN says we should be able to complete the install and then update to SP3. When we launch the installer and tell it that we know it's not supported but go ahead anyway, the installer goes away and never comes back. The process remains alive with no activity, but doesn't install or give any additional messages. We can't get an installer CD with SP3 already applied, of course, so we're unable to get the SQL Server installed.
Has anyone seen this? Solved it? Have some consoling words of wisdom?
Thanks - any help is really appreciated!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, i use to face this problem before. try to check the solution in microsoft knowledge base www.microsoft.com/support.
as far as i remember the article in knowledge base state that you need to install windows xp first and install sql server with its service pack. test it if it working properly then upgrade your windows xp to windows server 2003. then everything is working fine. try it and hope it work. 
Roath Kanel
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - we checked the MS KB's but it says we should be able to do the install on a fresh Win2003 server. We can't deinstall the server and install XP to try this - the server's already up and running.
We're faced with how to get SQL Server 2000 on a running Win 2003 Server.....
|
|
|
|
|
Since I've installed visio 2003 on my machine ( the tech guy did ), my system is behaving weird, mostly the language selector is acting up, there seems to be 2 of them, one that looks xp-ish, and the other one looks w2k-ish (!); and the "selector" does not show up when clicked on it to change language ( keyboard layout ).
On top of that , outlook misbehaving ...
Is it possible that it was a bad idea to mix'n'match Visio (from office 2003) and the current Office 2000 ?
Thanks ...
Max.
Maximilien Lincourt
Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
|
|
|
|
|
If any one knows about install shield please help!
I am using Install shield developer 8 SP2 evaluation. I need to create setup such that it checks for the version of IE6, updates if necessary and reboot. After reboot the setup continues in the normal fashion. Then it checks for DotNet Framework 1.1 and MDAC 2.8, Install in necessary. If os is win 98/ME it should reboot before continuing in the same manner as above.
Please assist,
Its Urgent.
Regards,
Rahul.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have the following lines in my .js file.
var WshShell = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell");
var WshEnv = WshShell.Environment("PROCESS");
WshShell.Run (exe1, 1, 1);
WshShell.Run (exe2, 1, 1);
WshShell.Run (exe3, 1, 1);
WshShell.Run (exe4, 1, 1);
So, for the 4 executables I invoke, the system executes them on 4 different shells I believe, because I see 4 different blank command prompt screens poping up.
My question is can I have all the executables, executed in a single command prompt screen. So I want to see a single command prompt window, how do I do this?
Thanks,
Prashant
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right board, so please excuse if not.
I want to have an application started on the ppc just when the ppc is docked to the cradle so just in time with activesync.
I googled a lot, searched and examined the registry but nothing helpful found 
Maybe someone here has the right idea?
The background is that I still need activesync to sync my mail, calendar, ... but I have another application which synchronizes database data.
Is that possible (and how)?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm running a MS home network and ned to use xcopy to automate a few backup procedures.
The problem is I live in Portugal and the date format used in most computers here is dd-mm-yy: I want to backup files to a low-end pc that works as a backup server, but because its BIOS is so old it won't give me the option to set the date format to other than mm-dd-yy (the default in the US, I guess). This confuses xcopy that mistakenly reports files modified on the same date as having different dates, when using the /d option (only copy newer versions of the file).
Resetting the date format in the newer computers on the network is out of the question, but if I could get my hands on the xcopy (or a xcopy-like) source code I'm sure I could tweak it (in C++) to recognize both date formats...
Any help is appreciated!;P
PS: Strangely, the windows explorer does not misinterpret the date formats when browsing the backup server...
BigManel
Socrates: "Knowledge is Everything"; Jesus: "Love is Everything"; Newton: "Physics is Everything"; Einstein:"Everything is Relative".
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, the BIOS has nothing to do with date formats. The date is just a number, and will be interpreted by the OS, not the BIOS.
In Windows, you can alter the date format using control panel settings, although it doesn't sound like you need to, since Explorer gives you 'expected' results.
Do you have different system default settings, I wonder? In Win2K and XP, I think you can set the system locale (as well as the user locale) to be non-US, which may then affect the behaviour of XCOPY.
However, I'd guess that XCOPY always uses M-D-Y format for /D:date, as I'm in the UK, and we would use D-M-Y for preference, but it doesn't. Having said that, US English and UK English are almost the same in other respects, so maybe that's wrong.
Steve S
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Steve S for your swift reply!
Well.. I guess you're right. I tried and managed to get the old PC to show up the dates with the right format (using DOS' COUNTRY.SYS) but the problem persists. I checked the very old DOS help command and it says XCOPY uses the date format defined by COUTRY.SYS, but since I'm running the version from one of the newer machines I guess it no longer applies.
I ran a small test on a set of 27 files randomly taken (well.. the shortest in size) from the My Documents folder. I copied them to c:\test and then to \\backupserver\c\test
I then used the dir command on both directories and the result (shown below) was the same, the only difference being the bytes free information.
02-01-1997 00:02 <DIR> .
02-01-1997 00:02 <DIR> ..
24-03-2004 13:57 0 a
14-04-2004 17:47 32.256 aas.xls
16-01-2004 00:42 34.304 acta cf.doc
30-04-2004 17:49 446 apm.plc
30-04-2004 15:53 4.014 apm.res
14-05-2003 18:07 13.312 bioelectro.xls
10-01-2004 19:32 25.088 blackbir.doc
27-04-2004 18:22 175 bq.plc
29-04-2004 18:57 29.027 bqexpiV.zip
15-03-2004 17:36 385 contagem.txt
11-04-2004 00:17 15.291 create_mgr_html.htm
30-04-2004 12:25 39.936 Doc2.doc
30-04-2004 12:25 60.928 Doc3.doc
14-05-2003 11:39 10.752 Enzim.xls
30-04-2004 17:53 182 eu.plc
30-04-2004 12:26 62.976 exp IV.doc
30-04-2004 19:50 68.096 exp IV.xls
27-10-2003 19:59 77.670 fcul.bmp
24-03-2004 13:56 3.372 fcul.tnt
12-04-2004 17:58 903 manibru_htm.htm
30-04-2004 19:50 724 mm.plc
27-02-2004 03:38 44 motherboardP90.txt
14-04-2004 20:27 7.379 mula.htm
16-01-2004 00:42 31.232 pareceres CF.doc
29-04-2004 01:35 26.112 Prep Experimental IV.doc
27-04-2004 17:38 59 t.plc
17-03-2004 17:34 111 xstr.bas
27 File(s) 544.774 bytes
2 Dir(s) 185.942.016 bytes free
I ran the dir command directly from the server (Win 95) and the differences were the year format (DD-MM-YY instead of DD-MM-YYYY - could it be some kind of Y2K bug?) and two extra columns containing the DOS name and the extension.
These are the files that xcopy would have copied with the /D /Y /L parameters (copy only newer files, overwrite without asking and list only the files without copying them):
C:aas.xls
C:apm.res
C:blackbir.doc
C:Doc2.doc
C:Doc3.doc
C:exp IV.doc
C:exp IV.xls
C:fcul.tnt
C:motherboardP90.txt
C:pareceres CF.doc
C:Prep Experimental IV.doc
C:t.plc
12 File(s)
Why these files?? It has apparently nothing to do with dates or times or even 8.3 names vs long names... At least it's always the same 12 files! Any help would be very appreciated!
BigManel
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still having the same problem with my Automatic Update system in WinXP. Every single day, sometimes twice a day, the system downloads the exact same patch and waits for me to install it. It's patch #KB835732.
I still don't know whether a virus is deleting this patch everyday or what. All I know is that it insists on installing this patch everyday, and will it will sit there in the systray until I acknowledge it.
I tried installing the patch manually and that didn't work. I updated both my virus scanner and firewall and have run numerous full scans. Still nothing. I'm desperate now. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
"Go to, I’ll no more on’t; it hath made me mad." - Hamlet
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried disabling your antivirus scanner and manually installing the patch while it's disabled? Often AV software will mistake an OS patch for a virus and block its installation, though it may not tell you about it. Obviously, you should re-enable it after the installation is complete. 
Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am trying to have a timer facility with the following constraints,
1. The call back routine must be processed as fast as possible after the timer expires, though windows is not a RTOS, how close can we achieve this?
2. The callback routine must be run asynchronously. The thread should be able to assign a callback to be run after a particular period of time and continue with its tasks without being bothered to wait on that timer.
Given the choices available in windows, CreateTimerQueue, Multimedia timers, Waitable timers, SetTimer fn. Settimer is a plain fn, which does not guarantee prompt processing (WM_TIMER is has least priority). Timer queue implementation relies on thread pooling concept whose performance is a question when we think about RT performance. Multimedia timers allow only a few functions to be used in the calling function which makes it impossible to use mutex or semaphore fns in it. Waitable timers, block the calling thread.
Is there any other timer / or implementation that would help me achieve the above constraints?
Thanks 'n Regards,
S.Senthilkumar
|
|
|
|
|
TIMDLL from http://codeproject.com/ccp/JpmTimers.asp
or
BOSDLL from http://codeproject.com/ccp/BOS.asp
had just this in mind.
Both use a MultiMedia timer, it trips a heart-beating thread (every millisecond) which: -
1) spins-a-thread(starting at user supplied entry point),
2) causes a function execution(starting at user supplied entry point) or
3) sets an event-flag
as the user has specified. It is accurate to one millisecond.
Lymington
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Lymington for your reply. I am currently trying to understand your code.
Yours
S.Senthlkumar
|
|
|
|
|
Outlook 2000 ( sp3 ) is eating a lot of my CPU time, 99% when doing nothing; no network activity, just running wildly ... on its own ... ?
kinda' puzzled ... at least, it doesn't look it's sending out emails by the tons ...
Thanks for any info ...
Max.
Maximilien Lincourt
Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
|
|
|
|
|
This is mostly FYI:
For some time I have been unsuccessfully trying to install Windows 2003 on a Asrock K7S8XE MB / AMD 2400+. Also with the patches (applied April 9th)for windows 2000 this machine would no longer boot with that system either. So I concluded something must have been damaged on the board during some power failures (had several light strikes on the power lines this spring.) even with a line conditioner in the circuit. I was wrong, a new board (new rev of same model) had no impact. I have the same mb on several systems and drives in cradles so I can rearrange the system.
I have finally traced both problems this last weekend to a NEC 100Meg Zip drive. I swapped it out with a second drive and also a Iomega 100 and all had the same impact. Recieved a drive io error message and then the machine would crash and restart. Removed the zip drive and all is well. It also works fine with a 250 meg drive.
So I do not know if this is just a freaky combination or the drive in general. Is anyone using 100meg zip drives with other mb's?
I do not mind getting old. It beats all the other options that can think of.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried using my 100 meg Iomega Zip Drive with my XP machine.
After spending a day at trying to get it to work, I downloaded all the drivers from Iomega, I threw it in the trash. I could not even sell it on eBay.
I have a CDRW now, and I will never use a Zip Drive again.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to point out it is the 100 that is not ATAPI compatible. The 250 that I have is fine.
I do not mind getting old. It beats all the other options that can think of.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm developing an application that needs to lock the desktop, taskbar, switching keys, ...
I'm hidding the desktop using the following code:
ShowWindow(FindWindow(NULL, "Program Manager"), SW_HIDE);
I'm hidding the taskbar using the following code:
ShowWindow(FindWindow("Shell_TrayWnd", NULL), SW_HIDE);
The problem arrives if the user double click the desktop area - the start menu appears !
I need to disable the mouse clicks in the desktop.
I used the following (hook) code in Win9x:
LRESULT CALLBACK MouseHookProc(int nCode, WORD wParam, DWORD lParam)
{
if (nCode >= 0)
if (wParam == WM_LBUTTONDBLCLK)
if (((MOUSEHOOKSTRUCT *)lParam)->hwnd == GetDesktopWindow())
return 1;
}
return CallNextHookEx(hHook, nCode, wParam, lParam);
}
or
LRESULT CALLBACK GetMessageHookProc(int nCode, WORD wParam, DWORD lParam)
{
MSG *p = (MSG *)lParam;
if(nCode >= 0)
if ((p->hwnd == GetDesktopWindow()) && (p->message == WM_LBUTTONDBLCLK))
p->message = WM_NULL;
return CallNextHookEx(hHook, nCode, wParam, lParam);
}
This works fine in Win9x but doesn't work in Win2K !
If I use the WH_MOUSE_LL in Win2K it works fine !
I would like to use the same code for Win9x and WinNT/2K.
Can anyone help me ?
|
|
|
|
|
I have converted our production server to 2003 Server and
have one website that is giving me fits. I am getting the
following error on a CreateObject("scripting.dictionary")
command. The error is
Server object error 'ASP 0178 : 80070005'
Server.CreateObject Access Error
The call to Server.CreateObject failed while checking
permissions. Access is denied to this object.
I have found and followed the knowledgebase articles that
tell you to make sure IUSR_<servername> has read execute
acces to the msvbvm60.dll and it doesn't correct the
error. If I make IUSR_<servername> and member of the
administrator group it works. I have even tried to get
IUSR_<servername> full access to the C Drive and even that
doesn't work. Only thing that does work is to make the
user part of the Admistrator group and thas leaves a
security problem. Any ideas on how to fix the problem?
Please help 
Thanks in advance,
Navneet
|
|
|
|
|
This object is implemented in the scrrun.dll library; you should ensure that the IUSR_ user has read and execute access to the System32 directory (I think).
The full access to C: had no effect, at a guess, because the Windows\System32 folder doesn't inherit its ACL from the parent. I can't test this theory right now because I don't have a Windows Server 2003 system handy.
Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest you right click on your c Drive and go to the security tab. In that see if the windows 2003 administrator is available. Go to the advance tab and see who the owner is. change the owner to the windows 2003 administrator. Add the user to this file in the security tab and give him rights.
Tarakeshwar
CCIE Q(Routing and Switching), MCSE Security
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
