|
the problem is the array is not an array of bytes..
it's an array of type double, declared this way:
" double arr[,] x; "
and the method "Write()" takes array of bytes as an argument...
thanx for replying
shakoosh
|
|
|
|
|
Using a jagged array instead of a rectangular one as above will do the trick. You just use double[][] x instead of double[,] x. See above. The code that would change would be the array initializers and accessors. If this is too much retrofit for the code, use the rectangular dual for loop method above.
|
|
|
|
|
you need to devise your own save/load algorithm
for example
<br />
for ( int i = myArray.GetLowerBound(0); i <= myArray.GetUpperBound(0); i++ )<br />
for ( int j = myArray.GetLowerBound(1); j <= myArray.GetUpperBound(1); j++ )<br />
myFileStream.WriteByte(byte.Parse(myArray.GetValue( i, j ).ToString()) );<br />
don't take my word on the syntax .... but you get the idea
|
|
|
|
|
Hi i want to access exchane server services through .NET ,
Does it have some object model sort
please guide
P.S. PATWAL
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have an application which opens and saves word document from vb.net(windows) application.
I open a document directly let us say TestReport.doc, I didn't closed and minimised the same. Now I run the .NET application and in the save dialog box I gave the same file name and path, then the application is hang up. Can any one guide me how to handle the same.
Thanks,
Sreepathi
|
|
|
|
|
Im not entirely sure what your problem is. Are you saying that the program will not close or minimise? What did you give the file name and path to - was it TestReport.doc?
"Can anyone guide me how to handle the same."
this sentence makes no sense - handle the same what???
Regards,
Pete
|
|
|
|
|
In simple I would like to know whether the Word document is already open or not before opening a document. I want a boolean which tells the document is open or not.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
the reason it hangs is that your instance of word is trying to show a dialog. this is because its trying to tell you that the docoument is already open.
a better way round this is to chage your code to open the document in word as READONLY.
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, a sore thumb you will have."
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know what's the equivalent of SQL Server Notification Services in Oracle?
I'm primarily looking to maintain the consistency of the data caches obtained from reading the database to be sync'ed with any changes made to the database. i.e, need a way for apps to register interest & be notified when a row changes for e.g. Are there any classes/add-ons in the .NET framework that works with the Oracle database? Any pointers would be appreciated.
Chen Venkataraman
|
|
|
|
|
XmlDocument doc = ...
doc.createProcessingInstruction(...);
My peers and I have discovered that in the 1.1 framework this method does not work. In 1.0 it worked, but not 1.1.
Does anyone have a work around, or have anymore insight into this bug?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
your code is wrong, you need to add the pi to the document...
XmlDocument doc = new XmlDocument();<br />
XmlProcessingInstruction pi = doc.CreateProcessingInstruction(...);<br />
doc.AppendChild(pi);
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, a sore thumb you will have."
|
|
|
|
|
Hi - a quick question. In one of my books it mentions that .NET programms can run on multiple platforms. Is this just referring to different versions of windows, or is it possible to run apps written for example in c# on linux/Mac OS/Unix etc.
If it is possible - roughly how is it done and is anything required on the target OS if it is not windows to allow it to use the application.
Cheers
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Since Microsoft built the .NET Framework based on detailed specifications, and then published those specifications and the documentation for the .Net Framework Class Libraries, it allows other people to produce code on other platforms that re-produces the same behavior... therefore, if you take C# code and re-compile it on another platform with C# compiler written for that platform, it should work.
Check out the Mono project, http://www.go-mono.com/[^].
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
Technically, you shouldn't have to recompile it.
Michael Flanakin
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't know that. On the other hand, perhaps I should doubt the observation of anyone in the Air Force...?
(* former Army guy *)
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
It's ok, I work with a former Army guy, and I have to explain stuff to him all the time... "No, that lace goes over the other one."  j/k
As far as I know, the only thing you truly have to worry about is moving between versions, or using any part of the library that may not be supported on a specific OS's version of the .NET Framework. I don't have any examples, but I believe there are a few things Win98 and WinNT4 can't do. When you're looking at the classes within the MSDN library, scroll to the bottom of the screen and the platform requirements are listed. Just use this as a guide and you should be set.
Michael Flanakin
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
Flanakin wrote:
It's ok, I work with a former Army guy, and I have to explain stuff to him all the time... "No, that lace goes over the other one."
-- that's probably why we stopped issuing lace-up boots in the late 80's and started issuing speed-lacers; you only have to lace them once... of course, I heard the Army got that idea from the Air Force... 
OK, i kinda already knew that about NT/98 -- but running Mono on Linux?
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, in theory, as long as Mono has everything implemented, it should work. But, these are also the same concepts that are used in the Java world, and you've probably seen how successful they've been.
In my opinion, unless Microsoft gets involved in the cross-platform .NET initiative, it won't completely succeed. I'm sure it will exist and successful systems will be developed. But, nobody knows .NET like Microsoft. And, Microsoft will continue to knock out updates, making it hard to keep up - especially if they feel threatened by Mono or other projects. And, you can't escape the fact that most people who use Linux are doing so for the sole purpose of not using Microsoft technologies. Not all, mind you, but I would feel comfortable in saying "most." ...Of course, they'll never admit it and I'll probably get a bunch of static for saying this; but, we all know it's true.
Michael Flanakin
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
Flanakin wrote:
I'll probably get a bunch of static for saying this
Not on this site you won't... most of the folks here seem to be pretty MS-oriented.
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
How can I debug an ISAPI dll in VS2003?
|
|
|
|
|
|
use winDbg and make IIS service or ISA service as the case may be to interact with desktop.
then associate Windbg with that Service.
You will get the stack dump.
or else put the trace messages to the text file .
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tarundeep Singh Kalra
|
|
|
|
|
use winDbg and make IIS service or ISA service as the case may be to interact with desktop.
then associate Windbg with that Service.
You will get the stack dump.
or else put the trace messages to the text file .
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tarundeep Singh Kalra
Blue Pill or Red Pill........??
|
|
|
|
|
This is a test message Please ignore it
|
|
|
|
|
This is another test message
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
