|
XmlDocument doc = ...
doc.createProcessingInstruction(...);
My peers and I have discovered that in the 1.1 framework this method does not work. In 1.0 it worked, but not 1.1.
Does anyone have a work around, or have anymore insight into this bug?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
your code is wrong, you need to add the pi to the document...
XmlDocument doc = new XmlDocument();<br />
XmlProcessingInstruction pi = doc.CreateProcessingInstruction(...);<br />
doc.AppendChild(pi);
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, a sore thumb you will have."
|
|
|
|
|
Hi - a quick question. In one of my books it mentions that .NET programms can run on multiple platforms. Is this just referring to different versions of windows, or is it possible to run apps written for example in c# on linux/Mac OS/Unix etc.
If it is possible - roughly how is it done and is anything required on the target OS if it is not windows to allow it to use the application.
Cheers
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Since Microsoft built the .NET Framework based on detailed specifications, and then published those specifications and the documentation for the .Net Framework Class Libraries, it allows other people to produce code on other platforms that re-produces the same behavior... therefore, if you take C# code and re-compile it on another platform with C# compiler written for that platform, it should work.
Check out the Mono project, http://www.go-mono.com/[^].
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
Technically, you shouldn't have to recompile it.
Michael Flanakin
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't know that. On the other hand, perhaps I should doubt the observation of anyone in the Air Force...?
(* former Army guy *)
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
It's ok, I work with a former Army guy, and I have to explain stuff to him all the time... "No, that lace goes over the other one."  j/k
As far as I know, the only thing you truly have to worry about is moving between versions, or using any part of the library that may not be supported on a specific OS's version of the .NET Framework. I don't have any examples, but I believe there are a few things Win98 and WinNT4 can't do. When you're looking at the classes within the MSDN library, scroll to the bottom of the screen and the platform requirements are listed. Just use this as a guide and you should be set.
Michael Flanakin
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
Flanakin wrote:
It's ok, I work with a former Army guy, and I have to explain stuff to him all the time... "No, that lace goes over the other one."
-- that's probably why we stopped issuing lace-up boots in the late 80's and started issuing speed-lacers; you only have to lace them once... of course, I heard the Army got that idea from the Air Force... 
OK, i kinda already knew that about NT/98 -- but running Mono on Linux?
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, in theory, as long as Mono has everything implemented, it should work. But, these are also the same concepts that are used in the Java world, and you've probably seen how successful they've been.
In my opinion, unless Microsoft gets involved in the cross-platform .NET initiative, it won't completely succeed. I'm sure it will exist and successful systems will be developed. But, nobody knows .NET like Microsoft. And, Microsoft will continue to knock out updates, making it hard to keep up - especially if they feel threatened by Mono or other projects. And, you can't escape the fact that most people who use Linux are doing so for the sole purpose of not using Microsoft technologies. Not all, mind you, but I would feel comfortable in saying "most." ...Of course, they'll never admit it and I'll probably get a bunch of static for saying this; but, we all know it's true.
Michael Flanakin
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
Flanakin wrote:
I'll probably get a bunch of static for saying this
Not on this site you won't... most of the folks here seem to be pretty MS-oriented.
What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.
|
|
|
|
|
How can I debug an ISAPI dll in VS2003?
|
|
|
|
|
|
use winDbg and make IIS service or ISA service as the case may be to interact with desktop.
then associate Windbg with that Service.
You will get the stack dump.
or else put the trace messages to the text file .
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tarundeep Singh Kalra
|
|
|
|
|
use winDbg and make IIS service or ISA service as the case may be to interact with desktop.
then associate Windbg with that Service.
You will get the stack dump.
or else put the trace messages to the text file .
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tarundeep Singh Kalra
Blue Pill or Red Pill........??
|
|
|
|
|
This is a test message Please ignore it
|
|
|
|
|
This is another test message
|
|
|
|
|
|
No! I won't ignore it!
EuroCPian Spring 2004 Get Together[^]
"You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." --Zig Ziglar
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
does anyone know of an Eclipse (the Java development platform) like plug-in framework for the .NET environment? Any hint would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Hatschy
|
|
|
|
|
hatschy wrote:
does anyone know of an Eclipse (the Java development platform) like plug-in framework for the .NET environment?
If you are looking for a fee IDE for the .NET Framework, take a look at SharpDevelop[^], if you are only looking for ASP.NET development take a look at Web Matrix[^].
- Nick Parker
My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the hints, but this is not what I meant. What I am searching for is not an IDE but a library, that can act as a plug-in framework for a completely different kind of application.
Regards,
Hatschy
|
|
|
|
|
There's quite a bit you can do with the VS.NET IDE via add-ins and designers. Checkout the reference docs for the System.ComponentModel.Design namespace for more info on addins (I wrote an article about it as well here[^]).
For a more full-featured interface for IDE integration, check out the VSIP (which is now FREE) here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/partners/[^]
What's available via the VSIP SDK is, essentially, the same SDK that MS folks used to build VS.NET itself.
--
Russell Morris
"So, broccoli, mother says you're good for me... but I'm afraid I'm no good for you!" - Stewy
|
|
|
|
|
In my random spare time, I was thinking about creating a few C# plug-ins for Eclipse. There is already an editor available, but I want to do it myself for a few reasons. I also plan on working on more than just an editor so I can learn more about the Eclipse architecture.
Michael Flanakin
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm wondering if the Application.Idle event in the .NET Frameworks supports a concept similar to that in MFC whereby the Idle method can perform a small amount of work and release control back to the message pump but also indicate if it is finished or not. I have a senario where a lot of work may need to be performed while the application is Idle, but I don't want to degrade the user experience. Nor do I want to use threads as that will just get messy.
Cheers,
Andy
|
|
|
|
|
Andy MacAngus wrote:
Nor do I want to use threads as that will just get messy.
Why not?
- Nick Parker
My Blog
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
