|
Fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote:
20 Jan '04 - Problem
Chris Maunder wrote:
21 Jan '04 - Fixed
That's what makes CP great.  Thank you.
Flirt harder, I'm a coder.
mlog || Agile Programming | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed that my CP newsletter includes stuff on C# and .NET, even though I don't have them checked. I do have MFC/C++ selected in my preferences.
My suggestion is to be more specific regarding .NET articles. Right now I have no interest in .NET, but I do have interest in C++. Focusing the MFC/C++ comments (which, I assume, is what's triggering the .NET information) to exclude .NET stuff would increase the signal-to-noise ratio for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm sure the answer to this is obvious (to someone, but not me). I have found several code contributions I have liked and downloaded. I know there are discussions regarding these submissions on a Code Project message board somewhere. I've even somehow stumbled into them at times and have even submitted a question (and gotten an answer). But I'll be darned if I know how! I've searched groups like C# for articles concerning these projects but nothing shows up. I've searched by author as well as article title but nothing shows, even though I can find the article itself. Please tell me what I need to do. I don't see any message board dedicated to submitted projects.
Thanks,
Ray Mitchell
RayMitchell@MeanOldTeacher.com
|
|
|
|
|
each article has it's own message board, on the article's page's bottom!
Don't try it, just do it! 
|
|
|
|
|
I really like most of the code on the site. My question is what is the license for the code listed here. May I use it in a commercial product?
|
|
|
|
|
read the small text on the bottom right edge of an article:
Article content copyright <...>, 2003
everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2004.
Advertise on The Code Project | Privacy
so you have to ask the author.
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander M. wrote:
so you have to ask the author.
Generally speaking, if someone is posting something here, it's undoubtedly meant to benefit all programmers - so I would say that while asking would be a courtesy (and one I would encourage), I think it's reasonable to assume that you can use code here in a commercial environment.
The exceptions to that would be where the author explicitly states that it is only for use in non-commercial software, or if the license of the software in the article is incompatible with the licensing of the commercial product (eg, GPL in a closed source product).
On a legal basis, you're right - the copyright is retained by the original author, and that doesn't change just because it's posted here.
--
Ian Darling
"The moral of the story is that with a contrived example, you can prove anything." - Joel Spolsky
|
|
|
|
|
I, as most probably, ask a lot of hardware questions as well as programming questions. I was wondering if there was a possibility of adding a new message area for general computer hardware questions. I don't necessarily like the idea of cluttering the Lounge with them.
Who am I?
Currently: A Programming Student trying to survive school with plan to go on to Univeristy of Advancing Technology to study game design.
Main career interest include: Multimedia and game programming.
Working on an outside project: A game for the GamePark32 (GP32) portable gaming console.
My website: www.GP32US.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
as you know when I reply to somebody
there is the checkbox: Notify me by e-mail if someone answers this message
It would be a very useful improvement to have samething similar in two other places:
1)
At the end of each message
like:
[Reply][Email][View Thread][Get Link][Notify me]
2)
and at the end of each article !
Is that possible ?
That would be great !
Marcello
|
|
|
|
|
Marcello wrote:
[Notify me]
Thats a kind of subscribing to the message's response. This seems nice, but this 'loads' the bandwidth like hell, especially in Lounge and other non-programming board.
If thats for articles.. yes, it has good idea behind that
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Atleast let people know why they got 'less' votes. The reason for 4 or 5 in the votes are ok... but we would be curious to know why people votes us... 1, 2..
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
To the best of my knowledge, all areas on CP where it is possible to vote (articles, forums, polls) also provide a means of leaving comments.
If the person voting wishes to comment, they are able to.
If they do not wish to comment, there is no way (short of, perhaps, standing behind them with a whip and a threat) to force them.
But in the end, it's all just database access right? And that stuff is just plain boring.
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote:
If the person voting wishes to comment, they are able to.
Thats enough for now!!
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to allow people to choose to view more than 50 posts per page in the forums (i.e. 75, 100)?? It seems like 50 isn't a lot, especially when some threads have a bunch of responses. Thanks!
Agent 86
|
|
|
|
|
u got my vote 
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Since it probably isn't that hard to do, why don't CP make an input edit box and the user uses a customized value like 55 or 101 so on...
Actual Linux Penguins were harmed in the creation of this message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I found a message similair to this one and put it on my sig.;P
Actual Linux Penguins were harmed in the creation of this message.
|
|
|
|
|
Actully speaking.. I didnt think of that.
But I dont think that this would be wasy to carry where the cookies/session variables are blocked!!!
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
I imagine it would increase the load on the database server(s). And if the DB servers get swamped, the whole site suffers.
--Mike--
Ericahist | CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | Homepage | 1ClickPicGrabber New v2.0.1! | RightClick-Encrypt
There is a saying in statistics that a million monkeys pounding on typewriters would eventually create a work of Shakespeare. Thanks to the Internet, we now know that this is not true.
|
|
|
|
|
It happened to me once, and I've since become ever mindful of it. I voted an incorrect number, and wished I could've recalled it.
My suggestion is (in the form of a question), "If the person cannot correct an incorrect vote, how about his/her ability to nullify the vote?"
IOW, he/she cannot vote a second time for the same article, but at least he/she would have the ability to correct the error made (in a way).
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
That's a very good idea - Especially if an article wasn't so good and then the author updated it and improved it. In that senario I'd like to be able to recast my vote to reflect the new improved nature of the article.
--Colin Mackay--
EuroCPian Spring 2004 Get Together[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
if an article wasn't so good and then the author updated it and improved it. In that senario I'd like to be able to recast my vote to reflect the new improved nature of the article.
This sounds a 'reasonable' reason
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Good call. Added to the TODO list. This will most likely not appear until CodeProject v2.0.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
