|
Wordle 796 3/6
β¬π¨π¨π¨β¬
β¬π¨β¬π¨β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 796 5/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨β¬
π¨β¬β¬β¬π©
β¬π¨β¬β¬π©
β¬π©π©π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 796 4/6
β¬π©β¬β¬β¬
β¬π©β¬β¬β¬
π¨π©β¬β¬π¨
π©π©π©π©π©
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #579 2/6 (100%)
π©π©π©π¨β¬βοΈ
π©π©π©π©π©π
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Short day, but butcher dies if he met the conditions (9)
Short day, SATurday
but butcher (anag)
dies if diesif
ISFIED
he met the conditions
SATISFIED
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
He didn't give the answer ... just hinted at it. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I would normally assume it's me, but now I have had weird things happen on three different PCs.
PC1 - office desktop. A simple app uses a base price (which changes occasionally) to calculate pro rata charges for a portion of a year. The changeable full year price is stored as a setting. I noticed that the results it was giving didn't look right and realised it had re-installed itself and the setting containing the price had not been preserved. I opened it a few more times and each time, it re-installed. Then, for no obvious reason, this behaviour changed and it now just runs correctly and retains the cost stored in Settings.
PC2 - laptop and a different ClickOnce application. I had used the program on Sunday night. On Tuesday, I needed it again and it wouldn't run as it couldn't find the installation files (as they would be on a USB). Try several other "own-rolled" apps and all of them do exactly the same thing - none would run without re-installing first.
PC3 - home laptop. Needed to do some updates to the software mentioned in the paragraph above. Did so, worked fine, went to update the installed version on my PC. Ran into the "You can't install from this location as it is already installed from another location" issue so though I would just un-install and start afresh. Nope, this installed program (which happily ran on this machine) did not appear in my apps list, so I couldn't uninstall it. So had to create a folder that matched the previous installation folder and update it from there, which worked.
Today I am back on PC2 and the software concerned suddenly DID work without a re-install but none of the other programs would. I was able to update it and all seems well.
So, I appreciate there may be no limit to my own ability to c**k it up but it seems like there's something else going on here as it has affected various apps on 3 PCs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
You seem to have linked back to your post!
|
|
|
|
|
Sigh. Thanks. I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
This explains a couple of calls I got yesterday. That click-once hasn't been updated in years and suddenly it needs to be installed again? 
Easy enough, tell them to click 'Install' and move on.
As a side note, I have a couple of click-once deployed apps where I need to change the download location. What a PITA! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm half-convinced MS is pulling a Tesla ... the equivalent to shortening "battery life" with software updates. I won't bore you with my details but I believe it's all related to their "cloud" agenda.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
|
I needed to check traffic conditions at the junction of the A3 and M25, so I went to the AA website. I decided to decline all cookies, which normally closes the popup immediately. Instead it showed a second popup with the message:
Quote: Processing Preferences
We are processing the requested change to your cookie preferences.
This may take up to a few minutes to process.
To be fair it only took about 45 seconds ...
|
|
|
|
|
I've never run into that one but have hit unsubscribe on spam emails, landing on a page where you have to enter your email address (which they already know from their custom link) and read instructions to find the right radio button to unsubscribe from all their spam. 
|
|
|
|
|
Or like the phone systems that require you enter in information to speak to a live person only for the live person to ask you the same information you just entered.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I decided to decline all cookies
Getting rid of that was the very reason for Brexit, wasn't it? 
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
GDPR overreaches. It even hits US web-sites that are primarily aimed at US citizens and residents, just because someone from the EU might visit the site by accident. While I understand site owners should be responsible for securing any data they collect, individuals need to also have some responsibility to not indiscriminately share their information.
|
|
|
|
|
It goes the other way as well: When US companies market products in Europe, they repeatedly try to avoid EU (or national) regulations by arguing against the lines of "But this is an American product - that is how it is! Denying us to sell it is against principles of free trade and open competition!"
We have had troubles with smartphone chargers, handling of non-US-format mail addresses and telephone numbers, adherence to requirements for translation to local language and support for extended character sets, universal design requirements (i.e. making the device usable for people with various handicaps) and a zillion other things. US manufacturers are willing to adapt to US requirements, but refuse to adapt to European requirements (obviously not always, but sufficiently often to be a constant itch).
The main rule seems to be: US regulations shall apply in the US market, no matter if the user is European. US regulations shall apply in the marketing of US products and services even when they are sold in Europe.
If US interests, both at the private and corporate level, would accept and practice a perfect symmetry with Europe, I would be much more satisfied. Today, that is far from the case. If anyone claims "We don't want any European business practices in the US!" then Europe should have the right to stop any US business practice in Europe.
Please stop any commercial ads/spam "primarily aimed at US citizens and residents" from appearing on the web pages I see, and in my mailbox! That would take care of a lot of what I have to delete every day, or filter out when browsing.
|
|
|
|
|
obermd wrote: individuals need to also have some responsibility to not indiscriminately share their information
That's the problem.
Websites start collecting your data as soon as you hit the home page.
They track the links you click, via what page I found them, my location, the pictures you look at, your mouse movement, etc.
I don't even have to explicitly give them information.
Facebook is especially notorious when it comes to data collecting.
People who say "just don't get a Facebook account" clearly don't know how it works.
Every website with a Facebook share button collects your information whether you have a Facebook account or not.
That's basically every news website, plenty of blogs, weshops, etc.
And you might say "but it's anonymous, so they have my data, but they don't know I'm obermd living at CodeProject Street 42."
They may or may not know (by comparing the data they have to data from other sources), but it sure as hell won't stop them from sending you "personalised" ads, or keeping you in your "bubble".
Google, for example, may show different search results because you recently visited a particular website.
It's definitely a lot scarier and a whole lot more sophisticated than a lot of people think.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: It's definitely a lot scarier
Scary?
A few years ago I left a parking lot about half an hour before a running gun battle broke about between 7 people in that very parking lot.
Now that is scary.
The fact that this very site, right as I responded to this post, shows an ad for a martial arts studio which might or might not be targeted doesn't scare me at all. I wouldn't even have looked at it except I was curious in the context of this post.
Those ads means I don't have to pay for the service that is being provided. I already pay for services which are not ad driven to the tune of about half of what I pay for the mortgage on my house. So not paying for other services is something I find most pleasing.
|
|
|
|
|
It's scary when you think of how people can be micro-influenced at a large scale to fit a certain agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha, if only that were true.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
