|
|
Not clicking that. What is it?
|
|
|
|
|
It's a jpg of a t-shirt.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hate programming
I hate programming
It works!
I love programming
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
FYI - You can scan links with 60 virus checkers using VirusTotal.com -- that's what I did before I visited the link.
VirusTotal.com even keeps the hash of the downloaded content from the target site you scan, which means if someone else has already checked the URL then it loads extremely fast.
Here's the link virustotal results of the image file:
VirusTotal[^]
But maybe you won't click it either?? 
And, I should add, I am very wary of clicking links also. It is wise to be wary. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I also have a robot who looks at the content before-hand and then tells me if it is appropriate or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you ever visit sites with ads?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the VirusTotal information . Is that a safe link to click upon ? or will VirusTotal check it for me ? - Cheerio
"I once put instant coffee into the microwave and went back in time." - Steven Wright
"Shut up and calculate" - apparently N. David Mermin possibly Richard Feynman
My sympathies to the SPAM moderator
“I want to sing, I want to cry, I want to laugh. Everything together. And jump and dance. The day has arrive — yippee!” - Desmond Tutu
“When the green flag drops the bullshit stops!”
"It is cheaper to save the world than it is to ruin it."
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, VirusTotal.com is the honey-trap. If you even saw the link (no need to click it) it is already too late!!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh good grief. Her codewitch-ness is not one of the anonymous spammers; we know where she[^] lives.
I think you can trust her not to post a dodgy link.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter "t-shirt I hate Programming" into your favorite search engine. There are several places that sell this t-shirt.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I found it right after I posted that.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Classic and true
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of years ago, my business partner got me a sweatshirt emblazoned with a big
<br / as a private joke!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
link to firefox source search
At first pass it looks to me like chromium (ipc/chromium/src) is used for some/all extensions, presumably to support browser extensions designed for chrome. The media handler for gmp (whatever that is) (at dom/media/gmp) seems to use a chrome extension to render gmp media. Then there's security/sandbox/chromium which I guess is for some kind of compatibility mode.
If firefox uses chromium automatically even for just a subset of media/pages, how can it claim to not be based on chromium?
|
|
|
|
|
Memtha wrote: If firefox uses chromium automatically even for just a subset of media/pages, how can it claim to not be based on chromium?
To use something =/= being based on something. You do (I assume) use a smartphone, are you based on a smartphone?
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: ...are you based on a smartphone?
With some of the idiots walking around today physically unseparated from their device, it's sometimes very hard to make the distinction.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
firefox and chrome are both software, made of the same basic elements for the same express purpose. "Using" a smartphone, having it in my hand and pushing buttons, does not at all equate to one piece of software "using" another piece of software by engulfing it.
"Based on" in this context is software jargon that does not really apply to anything biological or anything at all other than software and maybe literary works. If you found a book (A) that contains another book (B) in its entirety, would you not say that A "is based on" B? Maybe A is a compilation of dozens of books so you could say that it is based equally on all the books it contains, no?
|
|
|
|
|
Memtha wrote: If you found a book (A) that contains another book (B) in its entirety, would you not say that A "is based on" B?
What if A only contains B as a story a character is telling another character? Then B is just an element of A and A wouldn't be based on B. Or what about log4j? All software that uses log4j isn't based on log4j.
Personally I think if something is based on something else it means that the majority of the functionality can be directly or indirectly traced back to that something else. Like in an Angular app, everything can be traced back to a template, component, injector, directive, service, etc since everything runs on top of Angular - therefore an Angular app is based on Angular.
In that respect I think den's analogy makes sense - it's pointing out there's a difference between using something and being based on something. Just my 2 cents 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't disagree, but by that definition chrome isn't fully based on chromium either because rendering is a relatively small part of what a browser does.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
