|
Might be worth trying the "multi-Account containers" add-in for firefox.
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't appear to do anything Chrome's equivalent built in feature does; if anything the FF one seems to be less capable if the screenshots are implying what I think they're implying. Chrome's failed because there were only subtle differences between chrome profiles A and B's windows.
The screenshots make me think the FF extension is trying to do it at the tab level not the top level window level. While cramming everything into a single window would avoid FF's tab restore on restart forgetting anything beyond the most recently closed window (meaning your state is ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ed if you accidentally tear a tab out without noticing it and then close the main FF window first); it also manages to fail even more completely at supporting my needs by not letting me have multiple users on screen(s) at once so I can just mouse left/right to manipulate things as needed.
Even if it did do separate windows, and also solved the multiple window restore problem; all the windows looking like firefox would still leave it worse than running multiple different visually distinct browsers.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
The multi-account container add-in just keeps cookies and therefore sessions separate. I use it so I can log into systems like AWS/Azure using multiple accounts without having to resort to multiple browsers and/or incognito mode.
Things like saved passwords are available across all containers.
Useful recently where I could setup a new container for my daughters Teams classes without having to log out of my own Teams session.
FYI. You can use the History --> Recently closed windows menu to get back lost windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I used it to print CP articles when that was broken in Firefox.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually used and liked legacy Edge starting with Windows 10 v1607. It was fast, stable, and almost 100% compatible with everything I do on the web. Between Edge and IE11 I never found a site that didn't work.
I do like the security settings and overall configuration of the Chromium Edge better though.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually used it all the time. It was fast and didn't eat up the battery on my laptop like crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
An article in ZDNet the other day professed that if you are using Windows, Edge works best. If you are using Android, Chrome works best. If you are using Apple, guess what, Safari works best. Never use Apple but I can attest that that the first two are true. Makes since, the browser that is native to the OS will work best.
So many years of programming I have forgotten more languages than I know.
|
|
|
|
|
It is sad that the legacy version of MS Edge did not survive. Having Chrome as the only game in town is a very bad thing for the 'net. Yes, we still have Firefox, but Mozilla's existence is tenuous and somewhat dependent on Google writing them checks whereas Microsoft has the financial resources to survive whether their browser is popular or not. In the Windows world, Chrome is so dominant that Google is in control and has little to no incentive to listen to end users. Want a browser that protects your privacy? If Google doesn't like that, too bad for you. You can use Safari, except it's not available under MS Windows and end-users aren't going to figure out how to run it under Linux. Maybe you want to do all your work under Mac OS or iOS, two nice prisons with nice views of the outside world. Me, I use Firefox and continue to hope Mozilla can survive.
|
|
|
|
|
A cop pulled me over and said "papers".
I said "scissors".
Needless to say he had to let me go.
Next time I may not be so lucky.
|
|
|
|
|
Guy gets pulled over here in the south and the policeman asks him for ID.
Bout what?
|
|
|
|
|
You rock!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Annoying clues bats have ? (13)
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
SANGUINOLENCY - anagram of annoying clues - being bloody. (So only applies to vampire bats, really).
|
|
|
|
|
Yay, that's what the ? was for - you are up tomorrow
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
bloody annoying clue, that one was 
|
|
|
|
|
Did you get the anagram yourself or use the Web ?
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't know the word. But the word-length meant it was probably not just a simple noun, so likely endings included MENT (but no M), CY or ENCY. With those "set aside" the working set was smaller and I saw SANGUINE. A review of sanguine's meaning included the bloody connection and sanguinolent. I like bats and sometimes go bat detecting. Being here in the UK I tend not to associate bats with blood so I wasn't sure I'd got it right; might have been a co-incidental anagram. 
|
|
|
|
|
I did tried to find the word (after understanding that it is probably an anagram)... Only the third site had an answer... Seems to be a less known word...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I'm confused, you mentioned bats but your sig says you didn't.
Is this a Mudd's Women kind of thing?
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
@petepjksolutionscom
Where's the CCC?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Patience Timothy patience 
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Have you / would you accept a counter offer if you resign and your current employer is willing to increase your salary? There are a lot of arguments against it and also some for it, depending on the circumstances.
If you did, how did it work out?
You thoughts / experience with this?
|
|
|
|
|
If your reason to resign is money - you may accept, however you should first ask for that money and explain why...
If you did that and the only way was to get it is to resign - you have some problem with the employer, who only willing to pay when it hurts him... Hi may will hurt you back if there is a chance...
So it is a very delicate situation, and if you have a firm chance to get another job with the right money and all, IMHO you should go with that...
Of course, if the reason not money, than it is not a question...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
If there are things that are making an employee unhappy enough for them to quit, then increased pay will only cover that dissatisfaction for a short period of time (I vaguely recall an academic study showing about 6 months). Eventually the unhappiness will triumph, and the employee will leave again.
Thus (and I realise I'm writing this from an employers perspective), thus it's only worth doing if there is sufficient benefit for having the employee for an additional 6 months, or if there is a genuine attempt to resolve the causes of employee dissatisfaction.
From your perspective the two things to consider would be:
- can you use your position to negotiate to resolve the causes of unhappiness?
- how would you feel to be in the same place, in 6 months time, with the pay increase a distance memory?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
