|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the gift of a final kick.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This article: Current Tax Slab Rate In India For FY 2018-19[^]
From this: deep1313 - Professional Profile[^]
Odd choice: Indian tax rates from an Indonesian member ... not even slightly relevant, probably plagiarised, and from a brand new member.
My guess is it's a tester, and spam will be added later if it passes.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 3-May-18 16:37pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deserves to be kicked for spelling Careers with a z!
Wanna earn lotsa mny in cding - plzzzzz snd me codz
|
|
|
|
|
But it looks kewel and trndyzzz! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is he really a spammer? 4 articles and the last message 5 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
I think Griff written an AI bot to dig CP deeper to bring old spams.
Yep, removing those messages is enough. Banning member(he's inactive) is really unnecessary now.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, one of his spam messages was immediately above one I was reporting from a different spammer, and it was obviously spam.
Why should we leave "inactive" accounts just because they haven't spammed for a while?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Agree. Maybe a warning before ....
|
|
|
|
|
What good does that do?
In this case, the user hasn't logged in for 4 years, so a warning - assuming his email is still the same - just reminds him that we exist: it does not educate him, or change his behavior. Allit does is encourage him to post fresh spam, doesn't it?
And is it right to kick off new spammers, if we let old spammers stay?
I'm not saying "delete his articles" - they don't seem spammy - but if he does come back to edit them at some point in the future and finds his account closed, he can ask for it to be reopened and at least learns then we don't want spam...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yep those articles by him is the only reason that I did hesitate to report him.
|
|
|
|
|
It's old spam, but yeah - it's spam.
When a message is just
Quote: Visit www.[DELETED].net to learn entity framework step by step
and he posts it as new messages to a small pile of articles, it's site driving in my book!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
