|
Am I missing something? It's a bit unorthodox, but I'm not seeing the spam.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for this, can you delete my report please?
And also remove my reports of blog and mem?
[Edit]
Sir Sean Ewington?
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Sean - there's no spam. 
There's a link to another article on his blog, which is perfectly understandable in a "technical blog" post.
There's a link to an article on the "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience" journal, which doesn't appear to be trying to sell me anything.
And other than that, the only links are to Wikipedia and Twitter.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, did not get that  and will stop reporting actively.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 23-Jun-17 12:34pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing left to report.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
All except #10 are gone.
#10 doesn't seem to have any links in the profile. Are you sure you've got the right account?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
At the time I reported it, the profile contained description for escort services. Now it seems that the text is gone but for some reason there are a few author points 
Perhaps @sean-ewington can see the history of the profile?
|
|
|
|
|
I can't, but I did see something else naughty they did.
Can we please hold off on these reports for a little while? We just killed two new members who were false positives. I don't think we can go through this manually. I think we need to either stop them at the door, or flag extremely specific things in an automated way.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: Can we please hold off on these reports for a little while? We just killed two new members who were false positives.
I'm truly sorry about that. I won't be listing these any longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 23-Jun-17 12:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
None left.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 23-Jun-17 12:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This batch is clean.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 23-Jun-17 12:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Another bunch bites the dust.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did reporting in moderation does not count anymore?
My report was indicated as the first one.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know, to be honest - I always open the user link, hit the "Dump the trash" button in the moderation queue, then report the user via his profile page. It is possible I forgot to hit the userpage report button this time ... 
Would be good to know if a "dump the trash" click adds a "spammer" kick to the user, but that would require Hamster Knowledge since the only way I know of to find the "reports count" of a user is to report him and see what the number is.
It would be handy to have a way to see the "kick the bugger" count, particularly when moderating messages or articles as past behaviour is generally relevant to present activities.
Hmm ... let's see what people think:
@Sean-Ewington
@Matthew-Dennis
Any thoughts?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I like the idea
If not visible for all, at least for some
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
