|
Quote: No-one remembers your name when you're strange.
Nor when you have a three legged dog that is the very personification of cute! I've got so used to being called Alaska's Dad/Master(as if!)/Owner/Friend (everybody asks the dog's name - nobody asks mine!) or just 'the bloke with that dog' that I'm not sure I can remember my name!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Urban legend: Lunching with English friends at the time of her husband's retirement, Madame de Gaulle was asked what she was looking forward to in the years ahead.
"A penis," she replied without hesitation.
The embarrassed silence that followed was finally broken by the former president.
"My dear," he murmured, "I think the English don't pronounce the word quite like that. It's 'appiness.'"
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
xkcd's latest What If[^]
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be OK, I've got factor 30 in the cupboard.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you'll also need lead-lined speedos
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Quinn wrote:
I think you'll also need lead titanium-lined speedos |
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'd go with tungsten, given that we're talking about both infrared and X-Rays, plus the normal heat.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Quinn wrote: I think you'll also need lead-lined speedos
I don't think mine fit me any more and you really don't want to see me in those. 
|
|
|
|
|
It can;t be worse than Sean in a Mankini, trust me... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Last week I posted about the need to set up a Bluetooth to Bluetooth connection from the Hi-Fi to my Android, but all suggested solutions failed, some at the first hurdle - "This product cannot be shipped to Cyprus". I therefore decided to take a different approach, and use LPOW technology.
The process first required a trip to the shed, and bury under eons of "It might come in useful later" stuff, to find the graphic equalizer that I discarded when I got an active crossover to drive the speakers through a matched pair of Mark Levinson's. This was then inserted into the chain after a passive preamp to select the source, and drives into an active class 'A' preamp to stuff lots of power into the MLs - peak power 1700 watts per channel times four channels...
Now I can plug in my Stax and listen with the audio shaped to match my degenerated hearing. I must confess that during the process the technology became LPOFW  , and when my wife got home, though she didn't say so, I suspect it became FLPOW tech, as in "That's not staying there!". 
So I guess it was actually FLPOFW tech, in the end - but it works just fine!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris C-B wrote: peak power 1700 watts per channel times four channels
Chris C-B wrote: degenerated hearing
OK, now I understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any other way to listen to Pink Floyd? 
Anyway, I forgot to add in the 1500 watt subwoofer with its own amp. 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Is there any other way to listen to Pink Floyd?
It also sounds great on my Bose QC 15s. Best headphones I ever had!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Chris C-B wrote: Is there any other way to listen to Pink Floyd?
I guess not, but living in a semi-detached place with nearby neighbours I have no need for 3200 Watts of stereo system though.
I will stick to my HD-650's for now.
modified 18-Jan-16 10:57am.
|
|
|
|
|
Display Name Taken wrote: I guess not, living in a semi-detached place with nearby neighbours I have no need for 3200 Watts of stereo system though.
Fortunately, we have a stone built detached house, with one metre thick walls, and our nearest neighbor is 50 metres away. Mind you, they do know when the Wagner goes on! 
|
|
|
|
|
Display Name Taken wrote: 3200 Watts of stereo system
Maths a bit off there - try 6,800! That is peak power, though. The sustained RMS value is a mere 400 watts, but the amps have a huge power supply, with a 1.2 KVA toroidal power transformer, and storing 230 Joules. The power is mostly to render musical transients instantaneously and cleanly.
|
|
|
|
|
I did spot the peak-power bit, but my maths is always off. Do you remember the old "Amstrad power" music systems? I can't remember for sure but I think a 100W Amstrad amp was around 10W RMS. Wasn't it called Music power or something like that?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, folks used to lie a lot about their amp's power output. Calling a 10 watt RMS amp a 100 watt 'music power' amp is theoretically fine, but how long can it handle that before either the output transistors burn out, or the power supply can no longer deliver that amount of power? According to the spec, my toys have eight 200 watt, 15 amp, matched power transistors in each channel's final output. They can put out 29 amps at 58 volts peak power (=1682 watts) each. The power supply can hold that for a reasonable amount of time, but not forever.
However, as the system is bi-amped with a stereo amp for each stereo channel, half driving the bass, and half driving the mid range and treble, and as the power requirements of bass and mid-range/treble have different characteristics, then you can get much more bang for your buck out of the power supply.
Back in the dim distant past a bloke called (I think) Carver pioneered some hugely powerful amps that had no power transformer at all, but drew their power requirements direct from the mains. They never caught on in a big way, and soon went the way of all flesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris C-B wrote: peak power 1700 watts per channel times four channels
But...does it turn up to 11?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: But...does it turn up to 11?
Dunno! Never met anyone brave enough to try it. Your eardrums meet in the middle of your head about half way up. 
|
|
|
|
|
...and nobody asked me what LPOW technology was! 
|
|
|
|
|
Wots LPOW technology? 
I guessed it was an acronym for the simplest cheapest option.
|
|
|
|
|
Display Name Taken wrote: I guessed it was an acronym for the simplest cheapest option.
Spot on!
Long Piece Of Wire
I will leave it as an exercise for the reader to ponder over the additional Fs.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
