|
Probably the easiest place to start is with a router. You may need another network card:
Limit bandwidth per port - Spiceworks[^]
Or, you may try running YouTube in a virtual machine; you may be able to throttle the virtual internet connection. You need to pick a virtual machine host (Oracle VM; Hyper-V) and have access to an extra OS you can install.
|
|
|
|
|
This really isn't a code problem. You COULD do it but you'd be writing a proxy server. That's an awful lot of work for little gain.
If your artificially limited connection cannot keep up with the playback, YouTube is going to detect the limited bandwidth and automatically go down to a lower resolution to download less data while keeping up with the playback speed. You can get around that by selecting the resolution you want but the playback will pause every few seconds while the player waits for more data.
Seriously, this is solved by not playing YouTube videos while you play the game or by selecting a low resolution playback. It's not solved by writing code.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you want to write/create a solution or do you just want a solution?
If the former then you would need to
1. Learn how IP traffic works
2. Learn how browsers work
3. Learn how to create a server
4. Learn how to work with threads and sockets
5. Learn how to throttle when reading a stream
6. Put the above together to create a proxy server.
If you want the latter then the following worked well for me for limiting bandwidth for a browser. You must however remember to stop it when the throttling is no longer needed.
Charles Web Debugging Proxy • HTTP Monitor / HTTP Proxy / HTTPS & SSL Proxy / Reverse Proxy[^]
|
|
|
|
|
When i bulid my application it showing errror like
Error: " Could Not resolve the com reference 65e121d4-0c60-11d2-a9fc-0000f8754da1 version 2.0. Object refrence not set to an a instance of Object " in vb.net
i do know how to solve this error ?
|
|
|
|
|
Please Edit your question and show the line(s) of code that produces this error, we cannot see your screen from here.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually the code is too big .
errror in Microsoft.Common.Target file
<ResolveComReference
TypeLibNames = " @(CompRefrence) "
.................
........
</ResolveComReference>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good heavens!
You've memorized GUIDs??
Seems an awful waste of brain cells!
"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed."
- G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
|
|
I can remember a lot of useless rubbish, but GUIDs I leave to Google. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone help me to read and fetch my gmail content from .net as per the security standards now?
reply me to this mail
jessy.infotech@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try MailKit[^]. It should help.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I am using visual studio 2013 and win7 intel processor, the app working correctly with no problems on a PC with intel processor, but on a PC with AMD it works with a bug!
The only difference between the two computers is the processor.
what might be the problem ?? I am newbie.
|
|
|
|
|
Given the information you've provided, it's impossible to tell you anything about what the problem might be. Hell, you didn't even tell us what the bug is. For anyone to give you any kind of useful information, you're going to have to provide a LOT more detail about the bug, what the code is supposed to be doing, what the code is actually doing, and show the code that's got the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
You are absolutely right, I wasn't clear, My question is: the different processors can make a problem ?
The code is hideous and unreadable at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Not a known problem
We're also taking your word for it that it is a problem between processors and not something else that gives the appearance of such. That's why we need far more information.
We're not asking for the entire freakin' application. Just the code that's affected. If, as you say, the code is hideous and unreadable, I would question the quality of the code before I question processor compatibility issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12134388 wrote: visual studio 2013
Just to be be clear - the one that it works "on" is not the one that has Visual Studio on it it right?
Because if not that would be the most likely cause of a problem.
Member 12134388 wrote: but on a PC with AMD it works with a bug!
Processor? Unless you have a PC and you physically replaced the Intel chip with a AMD chip it is going to be very difficult to get to the point where a bug is caused by a processor.
Much, much more likely to be caused by something else that id different between the two boxes. Likely what software is installed
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: Just to be be clear - the one that it works "on" is not the one that has Visual Studio on it it right?
Visual studio is on the intel PC , and it is working correctly on intel. I am not sure i got ur point.
|
|
|
|
|
The thing is, the native code you run on the Intel PC may not be the same native code you run on the AMD. When you compile your code in Visual Studio it gets compiled down to MSIL language, NOT NATIVE CODE TO THE PROCESSOR. When you launch the .EXE, the MSIL code get's JIT'd down to native code that the processor actually runs. This JIT is compiled for the chip you're running the MSIL code on.
I keep asking you for the code you're having the problem with and you keep ignoring that request. Without, there is very little anyone can tell you that's going to be of any use and surely no actual solutions to the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12134388 wrote: Visual studio is on the intel PC , and it is working correctly on intel.
Then the likely cause is that you are missing a library. It runs on your machine because VS (Visual Studio) installs many things. And if you have any additional libraries then they too can have libraries.
The target machine is probably missing one of those.
Next most likely is that there is some environment difference. For example you are an admin on your machine where the user on the target machine (you or someone else) is not. That is only one example there can be others.
|
|
|
|
|
there are lots of problems of login i faced everyday  . how can i transform my facebook linked code project account to email id based account.?
Ashutosh shukla207
|
|
|
|
|
What does this have to do with the .NET Framework?
You're in the wrong forum. Try the Bugs and Suggestions[^] forum.
|
|
|
|
|
ok sir ... i will remember. and follow the protocols
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have application in VB 2010 which write data to xml database, the rate of this data is 150 samples per second, the problem is that there is a data lose in writing to xml database, i try to write in text file and it is work fine. What is the problem, is xml not speed enough to write with this data flow rate?
Thank you very much
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
XML is NOT a database so your question is a moot point.
XML formatting takes time as XML has a bit of a large overhead and at 150 "samples" per second, whatever that "sample" is and how much data is in it, XML is probably not going to be able keep up.
Saving in an actual database engine, like SQL Server, may get closer to that rate but you'll still have to write-cache data and it won't be a real-time write to the database. Look into an MSMQ server to hold the messages and a second process that takes the data from the MSMQ queue and write it to the database.
The best option is to write raw, framed data to a file. This will have the best possibility of keeping up with your data rate. When sampling is complete you can then go back and read the data, and format it and store it in an actual database engine.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
