|
|
article gone, user still alive
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This post in QA How To rehash Files?[^] contains a link to a site blocked by the US High Court.
I've marked the question as abuse but am currently giving the member the benefit of the doubt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posts are deleted and member on 5
|
|
|
|
|
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
Gone 
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's a busy little tinker, isn't he?
I just deleted a couple of dozen of his "questions" - methinks this is a bot.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
Please see Solution 2...
Detect Flash Player Installed in all Browsers[^]
User got a warning for now...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
modified 13-Jan-15 6:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks fine to me... but maybe I missed something.
|
|
|
|
|
Just was on the top of the question list, where the question is over a year old and the answer too have a few months...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: the answer too have a few months
but has been just edited.
[EDIT]
first by the poster and then by Manfred.
[/EDIT]
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean 'edited' - no changes I can see between this and the previous version...
Anyway - probably you are right...harmless...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the versions here[^]
I dunno about harmless, he was adding his own personal details to the answer (self-promotion)
|
|
|
|
|
I see it now - and even without seeing it before I got a bad feeling. It seems I got itchy with all the spams flying around...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it kicking time (for abuse) then?
"mouse hovering over the button"
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe not after all - his details has been removed, so maybe a warning would do...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I added a warning...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh... now I see. Hmm.
1. OP asks question. It's solved.
2. A few months later someone posts a new answer saying the existing answer won't work in some scenarios
3. Just today, the author of the dubious answer edited his post, adding his contact details to it.
4. Manfred R. Bihy has just removed the contact info.
I don't have a problem with answers that are posted a few months after the question, because they are often useful to googlers who may come across the question in the future.
But those contact details[^] make me smell something 
|
|
|
|
|
It is not so good question, but I still cannot see anything so bad to report it here.
Are your accusations based on the timing (when it was posted, edited, etc.)? But what's wrong with posting a question, not attending it and refreshing later? Some just have no time to refresh it, or can get a better idea on what to ask about on the same topic. It's better than multiple re-posting.
Do I miss something?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
The last update was the personal contact info of the member in solution 2. At the end the info removed and member got warning...The same time I crossed out the link...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
