Re: What is it? - CodeProject

Ahh... now I see. Hmm.

1. OP asks question. It's solved.
2. A few months later someone posts a new answer saying the existing answer won't work in some scenarios
3. Just today, the author of the dubious answer edited his post, adding his contact details to it.
4. Manfred R. Bihy has just removed the contact info.

I don't have a problem with answers that are posted a few months after the question, because they are often useful to googlers who may come across the question in the future.

But those contact details[^] make me smell something Dead | X|

Not a good question, but what's so abusive?

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov13-Jan-15 16:12

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov

13-Jan-15 16:12

It is not so good question, but I still cannot see anything so bad to report it here.
Are your accusations based on the timing (when it was posted, edited, etc.)? But what's wrong with posting a question, not attending it and refreshing later? Some just have no time to refresh it, or can get a better idea on what to ask about on the same topic. It's better than multiple re-posting.

Do I miss something?

—SA

Sergey A Kryukov

Re: Not a good question, but what's so abusive?

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter13-Jan-15 18:14

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

13-Jan-15 18:14

The last update was the personal contact info of the member in solution 2. At the end the info removed and member got warning...The same time I crossed out the link...

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

[Gone] Big old spam hunt reprise. Part IV - 120 of 464

den2k8812-Jan-15 20:29

den2k88

12-Jan-15 20:29

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

Re: Big old spam hunt reprise. Part IV - 120 of 464

OriginalGriff12-Jan-15 21:39

OriginalGriff

12-Jan-15 21:39

Spam deleted - members need more kicking. :phew:

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Ewwww yuck

Mitchell J.12-Jan-15 23:42

Mitchell J.

12-Jan-15 23:42

for (int j = 0; j < spammers.Count; ++j)
{
    CarefulCoder.ApplyBoot(spammers[j]);

    if (CarefulCoder.Mouse.IsWornOut)
        CarefulCoder.Mouse = new Mouse();
}

If only.

Gone

Richard Deeming13-Jan-15 1:58

Richard Deeming

13-Jan-15 1:58

10th kick applied to the last surviving spammer.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

Spam in Objective-C

vonb12-Jan-15 20:12