|
|
Gone and Gone...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy, Griff, not paste... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting - wonder how he survived the cull?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it took 10 days before I stumbled across the posts, so maybe we don't visit that forum all that often... 
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I can believe that - but it's the "message automatically removed" with only two spammer votes on the poster that confused me!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I know! I also found it odd that I was the first to red-flag him as Spammer. It seems unlikely that all 12*6 (or is it 12*5) reports on the messages were for Abusive. Go figure.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Chris's new anti spam system in it's early stages?
(It seems to be working pretty well most of the time at the moment  )
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: It seems to be working pretty well most of the time at the moment
Yes, but sometimes it attacks posts by us regular memb
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if you will post poems about your love guru, I'm not surprised! 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I still see it as plagiarised. Copying some one's materiel and tagging it as Taken from..... can't be considered as our own work.
I reported that but left user for now as this is for the first time.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Otherwise I could just copy every article here, put "I copied this from..." and have the highest article count on the site!
Just saying where you got it from does not make it yours and give you a right to copy it, any more than stamping "I copied this from Adobe" on a job lot of blank DVD's would make it legal for me to sell pirate copies of Photoshop! I'm pretty sure Adobe's lawyers would want to get involved rather quickly if I tried...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
You are right in your explanation of the fact that the "article" is not legitimate.
But, for the note, please understand that plagiarism and copyright or "intellectual property" violation are unrelated. If you consider them separately, it will make it clear.
Plagiarism is a sort of lie, when someone claims the false authorship of some material and conceal the real author. This is of course the crime against both the original author and the readers. After OP admits the truth, it seizes to be plagiarism, but it does not make the publication legitimate, by different reasons.
The cheater should be kicked off our site, that's for sure.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I smacked it for Plagiarism. I don't care where they copied it from. The only work he put into it was Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh come on!
There was CTRL+A as well, it was really hard...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
We don't have to argue is it is plagiarism or not.
There is no any creative work which is expected to be in the article. The article has no value, and OP had the opportunity to realize that in first place. And the first attempt was the plagiarism. If cheating is confessed, it remains cheating. People comment above explained more than enough why it is bad.
Even if formally it is not plagiarism anymore, after the added comment on the source of data, it does not make the work worth publishing.
The fake "author" should be kicked off.
—SASergey A Kryukov
modified 23-Feb-14 13:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam gone, member remains.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
