|
Firefox? Or another browser?
I'm tackling this issue tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, Chrome. Hope you get this fixed. It's really annoying.
I'll try working in another browser tonight.
Thanks.
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
I am currently working in IE and it is even worse! When I want to type in a code block it selects the code block as a whole. When I double click I am able to type, but the cursor really goes in all directions...
What's even worse is that I can't even type regular text. The editor is slow and inserts random spaces like crazy! Chrome only inserts random spaces at the end of a line when you move to another line. IE just inserts them while typing. I just typed 'T h e ' and was not able to remove to characters by using backspace. Only when I kept my finger on backspace for a few seconds was I able to remove all at once.
FireFox actually seems to work best out of Chrome, IE and FireFox. The cursor still moves around in the code blocks, but random spaces are not inserted (or so it seems). I'll continue working in FF for now. I was getting a little tired of Chrome anyway 
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Try now. You may need to do a Ctrl+F5 to force the scripts to reload.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking much better! Here is my latest attempt at writing in a code block (in Chrome).
"So this is a test, seems to work well...
Wow, that is gre at. "
Those spaces in and after "great" were inserted automatically.
Other than that the cursor did not move back to the beginning of the line or code block... Except when I wanted to copy/paste this and I had this text selected and suddenly it also selected the line above these ones (which I did not want to copy).
At least this should be workable.
I will let you know if I have any more problems, thanks! 
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I posted a link to the whole thread - to give context for that off-the-cuff remark.
Hopefully, that wasn't why he went...
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is something wrong with the LINQ discussion forum.
When I click Disussions / General programming / LINQ, I see a crosslinked post in the discussion named "Data check in query". Also the list of discussions seems to be incomplete and quite short. With following link I can see much more discussions: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4711722/Re-include-nested-objects-property.aspx[^]
Can you confirm this, or is it just my browsing settings? I use IE10 and Firefox 18.0, with same results
Gabriel Szabo
|
|
|
|
|
Check the Date filter. Set it to "all" and you'll see all messages.
Not sure what you mean by a crosslinked post.
|
|
|
|
|
The date filter works as you wrote, I didn't notice this.
By cross-linked I mean that I see an apparently unrelated reply for the "Data check in query" post, named "Re: Include nested object's property?". When I display the thread for that reply, it shows the correct thread. This is what I see:
"Question Data check" in query vkEE 18-Nov-13 21:27
"Re: Data check in query" ahmed zahmed 18-Nov-13 23:14
"Re: include nested object's property?" ewohlman 4-Sep-13 15:39
"Re: include nested object's property? [modified]" Gabriel Szabo 29-Nov-13 11:58
Gabriel Szabo
|
|
|
|
|
I just noticed a problem with the site search. The predefined filter checkboxes for the document tipe (Articles, Technical Blogs, etc.) aren't working the way one (or I  ) would expect them to do. To deselect one of these I have to click them twice. (each click causing a full page reload)
Browser: Google Chrome (Version 31.0.1650.57 m)
These are the steps where I can replicate the problem:
1. Open the search page: http://www.codeproject.com/search.aspx[^]
2. Select a checkbox on the left side (e.g. "Tips & Tricks")
2.a. Page reloads with the checkbox checked. (Url in address bar: http://www.codeproject.com/search.aspx?doctypeid=3)
3. Deselect the checkbox again
3.a Page reloads with the checkbox still checked. (Url in address bar: http://www.codeproject.com/search.aspx?doctypeid=3)
4. Deselect the checkbox again
4.a Page reloads with the checkbox unchecked (Url in address bar: http://www.codeproject.com/search.aspx[^])
Usually not so much a problem as "Everything" is checked and you can check the other values just fine.
But it's a bit of a nuisance when you search from the home page and the following tags get preselected: Articles, Technical Blogs, Tips & Tricks, Reference Articles, Videos, Training Courses, Research Library. And you have to click on each checkbox twice to make them disappear, resulting in more than 10 full page refreshes.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you develop a system that lets us to chat with the other developers?
|
|
|
|
|
Not a good idea.!!! because it will take us very loaded + social networking stuff then a professional & programming related chat discussion.!!!
I could support it only when it's allow for programming related chat only.( and that is already done by quick answer forum. ) 
Warm Regards
bjdestiny
"Mind Gone... Mind Gone... Mind Gone... ::: Roger THAT."
|
|
|
|
|
This has been suggested a number of times and always rejected by the majority of us. One of the reasons we like this forum is because we are protected from being drawn into personal chats.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
ok and thank you for your time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since we regularly get Java questions in the JavaScript forum, would it make sense to rename the JavaScript forum to ECMAScript[^]?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the correctness of the naming but who, these days, actually refers to it as ECMAScript? It's JavaScript. Actually I'd go as far to say it's progressed to Javascript.
We need to simply clean out the Java questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you kindly for the report. Consider them rescued.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I was browsing code project from my pc and i hit the mobile link below with fluid design, and the website design got corrupted.I think that the mobile link should be shown only when browsing from mobile.
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree - particularly with a tablet, it can sometimes be advantageous to switch between the two. The idea of the Mobile version is that it's a lot smaller (and thus faster/cheaper to load) and a lot easier to read. Sometimes, that is an advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
