|
I did start to read them, but my lack of historical knowledge made them a little less enjoyable, I think!
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
Well I suppose I am little more knowledgeable in regards to that bit of History (my parents had me late in life, and were children during WWII, meaning I was raised on diet war movies, comics and now the History channel). 
|
|
|
|
|
There is probably one (Based on posts by member on guns) on CP who can comment about authenticity/accuracy of details on GUN and that would be Roger Wright
There can be more on CP who are expert of guns, don't shoot me....!
Thanks,
Milind
|
|
|
|
|
Can't think of a thing....
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot to cover...
...oh, sorry, you covered that too! 
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature">
<first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last>
</sig>
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the best bits of Windows 8.1 are summarised here[^]
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah that was pretty much my feeling too when I downloaded the preview!
|
|
|
|
|
... being able to pin your apps to the taskbar and just work in desktop mode and have it be essentially the same then as Win7 Don't think I ever use any Win8 apps and it works pretty well. The mistake is in using it for 30 secs and getting the impression that you have to switch over and actually use those full screen WinRT apps.
|
|
|
|
|
What? It doesn't even say "Don't Panic" in large friendly letters? What utter rubbish.
Glad to be of service.
|
|
|
|
|
Install a taskbar - this way you may find yourself hate less
dev
|
|
|
|
|
Just did that
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
my wife manage my domestic IT infrastructure, so I didnt get too upset about Windows 8
dev
|
|
|
|
|
devvvy wrote: Install a taskbar - this way you may find yourself hate less
I'd prefer to skip it altogether and wait for Win 9, remaining completely 'ate less.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
are they still trying to get rid of "tradition desktop"? smark fu**
dev
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the bright side. (specially for you) When you install Windows 8 on your Mac, you will not miss the Aero-Glass. Since it's gone you will not feel that you are missing anything. A complete Windows experience on a Mac. 
|
|
|
|
|
Rutvik Dave wrote: A complete Windows Windows 3.1 experience
FTFY
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 8(.1) does have one good think!!!
You can to choose NOT install it!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
Well they do have some new security features like.......
Hide the setting so it is more difficult to disable automatic updates or turn of UAC.
And of course if UAC is disabled then some Apps won’t work correctly and won't tell you why 
And many more security features.
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote:
Can't think of a thing.... |
Even that sucks, so it's perhaps the world's first case of recursive suckage.
Mind you, it's OK for phones and tabs.
Where was it that we were listing things that different OSes were best at, and the only thing we could come up with for iOS was "connecting to itunes"?
It seems that even that is no longer the case[^].
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Thinking back to the time when it was first sold for about £20 in the UK, I can now say to myself it was the best £20 I never spent.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
I like it.
Access everything with the search.
Tiles, much quicker than any start menu item.
Defender, everything safe.
Looks cool.
Note sure what people are bitching about. Just learn how to use it.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Access everything with the search.
I can do that already, but a file manager is a lot more efficient, 99% of the time.
Rage wrote: Tiles, much quicker than any start menu item.
I have in excess of 300 start menu items, each of them accessible with two clicks. How many dozens of swipes would it take for that -- also bearing in mind that a lot of programs with completely different functions have similar names, and that a lot have names that don't actually tell you what they do?
Rage wrote: Defender, everything safe.
Defender, a big target.Rage wrote: Looks cool.
Like Hell.
My desktop looks cool, as do lots of other people's. Win 'ate looks like baby blocks -- nothing cool to see here; move along.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Access everything with the search.
The start menu does exactly the same thing without switching you to a completely different screen to do it
Rage wrote: Tiles, much quicker than any start menu item
We used to have Desktop icons before search, and that's effectively what the Start screen is (or just a more integrated version of the Apple Launchpad)
Rage wrote: Defender, everything safe.
I have Windows Defender on Win7. And it's not safe. None of them are truly safe.
Rage wrote: Looks cool
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I think everything is subjective, so maybe there is no point in discussing here. I only find too bad how everything new always "suck".
According to the amount of "xxx sucks" posts, I suppose most people here must still use WinNT with Visual Studio 6 on their computers, because these were soooo better than everything that was released after them... 
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: How much time do you need to navigate to an executable while it takes less than one second to type it ?
That's assuming that you know the name of the executable, which, as I said, can have nothing to do with its function, e.g:
- "Arachnophilia" has got nothing to do with spiders.
- "Flashpeak" has got nothing to do with volcanoes.
- "Wink" has got nothing to do with cute girls.
- "iSpring" has got nothing to do with Tigger.
Rage wrote: 300 menu items ? Why would you need them if you can search for them ?
How about because, for example, I have 18 different programs (many of which have multiple executables) for creating/editing diagrams/graphics.
All I have to do, with the start menu, is go to the "Graphics" sub-menu, and all of them are listed for me there, so I can choose the one I want.
What search string should I use, to match that perfect functionality "All graphics/diagram editors"?
And arranging baby-blocks by program type is a damned sight more time-consuming than dragging menu items to different sub-menus -- not to mention that you'd still have to sweep through page after page to find the program groups.
Rage wrote: And you'd at least need to scroll or change pages, because no 300 items hold on one menu page.
Perhaps your degree course should have included something about using sub-menus -- but if you don't use a computer for lots of different things, e.g. only for Visual Studio, e-mail, and browsing the Interwebs, the OS GUI is pretty irrelevant: they'll all enable that for you efficiently enough.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
