|
I can have a lot of apps open and running and not even crack 5 gig...including VS 2010.
It's nice, real nice, but we all know that we have to develop to the masses and not to ourselves.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012)
|
|
|
|
|
In previous jobs I've had to get by with a 2-4Gb Core Duo for tasks ranging from deleting mails to running a VM with SharePoint or BizTalk server. The latter scenario is so soul-destroyingly frustrating that I'm sure the CIA use it as an enhanced interrogation technique. It amazed me that my then employers expected me to be able to work productively with so few resources. What amazed me even more is that when I showed them the 30 minute boot time and 5 minutes waiting for a context menu their answer was simply "OK, we see the issue.. you'll just have to get on with it". Me waiting for my hardware to catch up all day (and therefore being barely billable) is fine, but as soon as there's a 5 minute discrepancy between the burndown chart in TFS and our billing system you call all of the team in (5 developers) for an hour long meeting about "doing things correctly". WTF.
My current employer is considerably more enlightened when it comes to stuff like this, I've now got an i7 with an SSD, 1Gb dedicated graphics and 8 Gb RAM. Anything remotely server-y gets put on an ESX VM, including Database Servers, ArcGIS Server and the like. These days I don't have to wait for anything much to catch up.
The funny thing is that I moved from a huge multinational with over 22,000 employees to a much smaller company with say 400 employees, albeit an ESRI partner. This taught me quite an important lesson: big companies sound great and all, but in reality you're just another number to them. They don't really give a toss what happens as long as the billable hours keep getting logged.
|
|
|
|
|
remotely working on a Blade. ok my laptop has 4 GB only, but I use it only for SSH to the blade
|
|
|
|
|
i have to use 1.5 on my virtual machine..
it's quite discouraging.... 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't actually know - well, I checked and it's 4GB - but anyway it's enough for my daily work.
If I need to do something really beefy I go on the server and it runs so fast you think it didn't start, then you start it again and it says, but I just did it.
~~~~~~~ <;,>< ~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
I have 4 GB atm and really want to get it up to around 6 
Thanks & Best Regards,
Umer Aziz Malik
Senior Strategy Developer
Aurora Solutions (Pvt) Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
1GB, 2GB and 2GB in all three machines I have. Dreaming of 4GB with the next. 
I appreciate your help all the time...
CodingLover 
|
|
|
|
|
So I have 4GB of RAM on my work pc and 6GB running on my home pc.. But in that I am running both Delphi and VS... Needless to say it gets hectic. I want to have VMs for what the clients would be using but then my poor baby at work will probably grind to a halt if I kick up 2 or more VMs...
Strangely enough, I can run multiple VMs on my home pc running both IDEs multiple times (never mind my pc @ home is an I7 and has about 9TB of space on it *innocent smile*... Imagine that!!! 
*sigh*
Cheers,
Glen Vlotman
"You cannot code for stupidity"
|
|
|
|
|
nortee wrote: never mind my pc @ home is an I7 and has about 9TB of space on it *innocent smile*
Envy that !
|
|
|
|
|
Must develop into the worst possible conditions that a customer may have. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should only have to test with the worst possible condition. Otherwise, it takes you that much longer to develop.
|
|
|
|
|
As already mentioned, you only need to test in worst possible environment...VMs work great for testing. I would hate to compile anything on our software's minimum required hardware!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to see you programming on a phone
|
|
|
|
|
|
*snarl*
Corporate IT
*snarl*
I eventually managed to nag, beg, and whine my way to 8gb; so far none of my dev coworkers have succeeded in this.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
No matter how much RAM I have, SharePoint is unimpressed.
|
|
|
|
|
That's because SharePoint is like a spoiled child. Give me, give me, etc.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I need to know who vote for more than 16G 
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody showing off
|
|
|
|
|
|
I managed to get a new PC with 24GB, and this has paid for itself over again by now with the highest work output I've ever done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can get as much as I like.
I have to share with my colleagues though, who have a virtual workplace on the same machine.
I recently got a bit extra, because I do all the heavy work 
I believe (yes, I am not sure, hardware never really was my thing) it is 4GB at the moment, which is the same as I have at home.
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
I voted 16GB. Reason: My boss said "Just tell me what computer you want". Result: I now have everything I need, including a lot of RAM and two nice portrait-format monitors 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Its not for showing of.
