|
Victor Boctor wrote:
Is there an easy way to view the user
What way do you think that the current author profile at the end of the article is 'not' easy to read??
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok I understand... 
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
USe some sense!!!
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I mean, it happens frequently that I go to articles I have used in my projects, and I start to read the post at the bottom to see if I can find a solution to a problem.
70% of the questions don't have an answer... and sometimes the answers are cool, and deserve to be keep in a separated list (a "How to" list).
Actualy good answers are bury by the all question posted, and frequently, the questions are repeated several times from different people that didnt notice an answer.
I think that there are several solutions. I can suggest a simple one: a field flag near the Subject that indicates "queston" or "answer" (default = question) and a button, to filter the answers from the questions...
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how do we automatically pull out answers from 3600 articles and display them separately? The only way I can think of this being possible is if I change the message rating system to allow people to explicitely vote for whether a reply is a good answer to a post.
I can do this if enough people feel it will be valuable
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, i have problem too. multi-thread version of code, make my form blink. why do not put a how to thread in article. a lot of people dont no how to thread, speacial multi. i read articles no mention of problem. tell me what wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
any chance you could put a different color scheme on the lounge or the soapbox? i occasionally post in the wrong spot because, well, unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page, there isn't a nice clear visual distinction (not like the VC++ forum, where the topics give it away).
-c
A | B - it's not a choice.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops. Meant to hit 5. That's twice now.
Jon Sagara
Hi! I'm Melanoma, Moley Russell's wart.
-- Uncle Buck
|
|
|
|
|
What, you mean you can't tell a foum based on it's forum ID shown in your address bar?! 
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
What, you mean you can't tell a foum based on it's forum ID shown in your address bar?!
David, he is not a true believer. It is our job to convert him. Get his address and we can walk over and knock on his door, to bring him the True Light.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Roger Wright wrote:
Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!
|
|
|
|
|
maybe you didn't read what i wrote:
unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page...
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
Sure I did. The top of the page is where the forum's are shown in the table. The top of the window is where the address bar sits. You wrote "unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page, there isn't a nice clear visual distinction" - the URL is not a nice clear visual distinction as the position of the forum ID is not immeadiately obvious, hence I suspect you were referring to the "red and black" forum table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the top of the page, the first thing that hits your eye is the big red forum name bang in the middle of the page. Unless of course you are following a direct link ot a message like those you get in response notification e-mails, but those all state the forum name anyway. Or I suppose unless you are red-blue colour blind (can that happen?).
|
|
|
|
|
i'm gonna say it again:
unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, to which I will say again:
What, you mean you can't tell a foum based on it's forum ID shown in your address bar?!
We've been full circle now. 
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
Ok, to which I will say again
to which i'll say ... quit ignoring the point of the post.
a simple color change would make identification of the forum trivially easy (regardless of which link you followed, what the thread topics were listed, etc).
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
to which i'll say ... quit ignoring the point of the post.
I wasn't, I was making a valid point. IMHO changing the colour of one of the forums would be a stupid idea, it would remove the instant recognition that is it CodeProject.com and it would open the way for every single forum being individually coloured so those that can't be bothered to check they are posting in the right forum don't need to spend any effort. You come down on people who post programming questions in the lounge for missing the "no programming questions" notice, yet you don't expect yourself to be held to the same standard? 
Even making more subtle changes such as, for example, a coloured stripe on the inside of the side bar would end up creating confusion for those not initiated into it's purpose. Look how many people are confused by the message colouring trigged by message voting.
A good solution would be to put the forum name in the document title, but that would still require some effort to read.
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
MHO changing the colour of one of the forums would be a stupid idea, it would remove the instant recognition that is it CodeProject.com
i totally disagree. and as proof that it's not confusing or detracting, i direct you to SlashDot. the forum colors change depending on the category the thread was put into (law, tech, entertainment, Mac, etc); in fact if you're on a Mac topic, the whole site flips into a kind of Mac OsX scheme (Aqua rounded edges and so on). but you never get the feeling that you've left /.
in /.s case, there's really no need to know which category a thread is in, because the rules don't change. but on CP, the rules do change (no programming Qs, PG-13, etc.).
i realize some people are afraid of change and wnat everything to stay the same forever. and that's ok with me, really. but, sometimes change is for the better.
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not afraid of change, but to me if it is orange and has a green alien on it it is CodeProject, and I suspect Chris and co are counting on that. Just look at the newsletter, the media kit, the official logos. CodeProject is quite unique in that respect, I can't name any other web site I have stumbled accross that has the same branding: I could tell you if a page was CodeProject without putting on my glasses, and I am very short sighted.
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
I can't name any other web site I have stumbled accross that has the same branding
a color scheme and a logo?
i'm not saying make it purple on red, maybe just change the pale tan background that the message headers sit on to a pale blue (a color that's already in heavy usage).
whatever.
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
a color scheme and a logo?
Not a colour scheme and a logo, the colour scheme and a logo.
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
Not a colour scheme and a logo, the colour scheme and a logo.
'k, so how 'bout a colour scheme in The Lounge, and a color scheme in The Soapbox? With the same logo for both? Subtle but obvious?
Shog9
The Man.
The Legend.
The Bored, Narcissistic, Whiteboard-marker Sniffing Programmer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
