|
|
That should be "quiet" instead of "quite".
The author of this survey was not quite on target.
I'd better be quiet now before I get bashed for being a wise guy.
Cheers! 
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, my fault. Thanks.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Still not fixed the 'noice'.
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
|
|
|
|
|
Notised the noice to late!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
I forget if I ever mentioned this before, and don't know if others have spoken of this either. But I have not seen this in list of current issues being worked on.
Love this site and all the content it has to offer. I've bookmarked quite a lot of articles that may be useful to me at some point. However, for someone with a lot of bookmarks (~17 pages worth on your site), it becomes very unmanageable to browse through the bookmarks to find what you want.
The category groupings (the links at the top) are broken per bookmark page, and you don't have a single page with all the bookmarked groupings to select from. So I may have to navigate through 17 pages of bookmarks to find the categories I've bookmarked that are currently of interest.
There is no sorting mechanism to sort by category, date bookmarked, etc. That would be useful.
There is no search mechanism to only search within your bookmarks, at least on the bookmark pages, haven't checked the home page, etc. where you can also search.
Fixing these issues would make bookmark management more manageable for someone like me with 17 pages worth of CodeProject bookmarks.
"A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible." - Freeman Dyson
|
|
|
|
|
When i was trying to update filters in questions and answers forums, where it showed me a page written :
OOPS we
Problem: Invalid viewstate. Client IP: --------- Port: ----- Referer: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/List.aspx?tab=new Path: /script/Answers/List.aspx User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0 ViewState: /wEPDwUJMjI2OTU1ODc3D2........
Ticket:
Server: Web04
The thing is, I had opened the questions and answers forum before signing in and then signed in on other page of this website. Seems the Q&A forum didn't recognize that i had already signed in. When i refreshed the Q&A page and then updated the filter, no error popped up.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice if I had control over individual blog posts in the profile page. I want to be able to decide whether or not any single post I make (or have made) will be visible to the public or not.
Currently, I'll have to either make the entire message board as public or private.
[Added] For instance, a blog post could be kept private until it is ready to be published. [/Added]
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
If you make it private, then how will anybody see it? or is that just a dumping ground for you to save stuff for your eyes only?
|
|
|
|
|
The threads that I mark as private on my blog page should be viewable by me only.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
... defeating the whole point of blogging surely?
|
|
|
|
|
(thats the bit i can't get my head round??????)
|
|
|
|
|
And who says that blogging (or rather ALL blog posts) MUST be public? Ever heard of the term diary, or "private journal"?
Do you know that ALL blogging providers allow you to mark blog posts that you choose as private? If CP provides a member blog, why should it not provide this option as well?
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: And who says that blogging MUST be public
Errrm the meaning of the word says, kinda intrinsic to the concept of blogging. OK you might restrict a blog to a limited membership, but this isn't what you asked for.
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Ever heard of the term diary, or "private journal"
Yes, neither of these is a blog, hence the different term.
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Do you know that ALL blogging providers allow you to mark blog posts that you choose as private?
Private to a group you allow: You can create a social group on CP to acheieve the same end.
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: If CP provides a member blog, why should it not provide this option as well?
CP isn't a blog provider, it is a dev site that provides some blogging capabilities. I think that turning it into an online store of private solipsitic musings will just burn server resources without benifiting the community.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I'm not talking about a "private group" or any such thing at all. You should read a post and understand it before replying to it.
I think I can go on with you, responding to each and every childish "response", but I'm not willing to entertain you. Fortunately it doesn't matter whether you understand it at all, because you just don't have to as you aren't the one who makes the decisions here.
Keith Barrow wrote:
CP isn't a blog provider, it is a dev site that provides some blogging capabilities. I think that turning it into an online store of private solipsitic musings will just burn server resources without benifiting the community.
That's a giant load of crap when self-appointed "elite" people take the stance on deciding what's good for this site as a whole and what's not. I'll leave it for Chris to decide whether or not to have this feature, but I've been suggesting features and reporting bugs for years, off which a significant portion was accepted and worked upon.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
The arguments brought against you were very reasonable. Responding in this manner is conduct that will not be condoned. Your actions will not sit well with the larger part of the community.
Repent now!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
There's only one argument that was made against my suggestion - providing this feature will "load" the servers. And I do not agree with that at all. It was a childish argument made, because he had to make some point against my suggestion.
I've made suggestions in the past to improve the blog feature that the site offers. This included being able to make an entire blog private, allowing or disallowing members to vote (or reply), etc.,
Hiding a particular post should not be such an incredibly tough task to do, especially when there are similar features implemented (hiding the blog itself as a whole).
It also isn't a particularly "reasonable" thing for someone to tell me that my suggestions will do nothing but waste the resources. It is hypocrytic horse crap, because they're not the ones who designed this system (neither do they know how this system works, or what would waste the resources). Especially when they are not the deciding authority and when they seem to have limited knowledge of what I'm talking about.
Manfred R. Bihy wrote:
Repent now!
Shut up now!
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Shut up now!
I think you better cool off. You don't seem very stable, better go and take your medicine.
Have a nice day!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
Manfred R. Bihy wrote:
I think you better cool off. You don't seem very stable, better go and take your medicine. Have a nice day!
Yeah, now you'll resort to personal attacks, and you think that *I* should be the one to cool down, and take medicines?
And oh, you have a nice day too, you sick old fart. 
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: And oh, you have a nice day too, you sick old fart
That one made me laugh. 
Thanks Rajesh!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
When I typed that, I was sure that some people may laugh reading it. But I swear to God, I wasn't expecting *you* to be among them. 
But hey, I'm glad you laughed anyways.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Turn my back for 5 minutes, and world war 3 has started in the thread..........
You lot must be bored for a Sunday. (At least Top Gear is on in an hour and an 'alf.)
Oh, I never voted anyone so don't know why I got dragged into the uni-voting!
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Turn my back for 5 minutes, and world war 3 has started in the thread..........
It could be even worse. "You gotta keep one eye looking over your shoulder", always.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I was browsing recent C# unanswered questions, and came across a question reported as having been updated 22 hours ago[^].
Opening the question, I find it was asked in March, 2009, and the most recent solution offered in Dec. 2010, and the most recent comment made on a solution made in Dec. 2010.
There's no visual evidence of any editing, or change. The person listed as the updater's name does not appear anywhere in the question, as solution provider, or commentor.
Wondering what the person listed as having updated the question actually did, and why this question has been 'propelled' into the status of "recent."
thanks, Bill
"In the River of Delights, Panic has not failed me." Jorge Luis Borges
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that was me deleting an entry by a spammer.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
