|
No, I'm not talking about a "private group" or any such thing at all. You should read a post and understand it before replying to it.
I think I can go on with you, responding to each and every childish "response", but I'm not willing to entertain you. Fortunately it doesn't matter whether you understand it at all, because you just don't have to as you aren't the one who makes the decisions here.
Keith Barrow wrote:
CP isn't a blog provider, it is a dev site that provides some blogging capabilities. I think that turning it into an online store of private solipsitic musings will just burn server resources without benifiting the community.
That's a giant load of crap when self-appointed "elite" people take the stance on deciding what's good for this site as a whole and what's not. I'll leave it for Chris to decide whether or not to have this feature, but I've been suggesting features and reporting bugs for years, off which a significant portion was accepted and worked upon.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
The arguments brought against you were very reasonable. Responding in this manner is conduct that will not be condoned. Your actions will not sit well with the larger part of the community.
Repent now!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
There's only one argument that was made against my suggestion - providing this feature will "load" the servers. And I do not agree with that at all. It was a childish argument made, because he had to make some point against my suggestion.
I've made suggestions in the past to improve the blog feature that the site offers. This included being able to make an entire blog private, allowing or disallowing members to vote (or reply), etc.,
Hiding a particular post should not be such an incredibly tough task to do, especially when there are similar features implemented (hiding the blog itself as a whole).
It also isn't a particularly "reasonable" thing for someone to tell me that my suggestions will do nothing but waste the resources. It is hypocrytic horse crap, because they're not the ones who designed this system (neither do they know how this system works, or what would waste the resources). Especially when they are not the deciding authority and when they seem to have limited knowledge of what I'm talking about.
Manfred R. Bihy wrote:
Repent now!
Shut up now!
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Shut up now!
I think you better cool off. You don't seem very stable, better go and take your medicine.
Have a nice day!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
Manfred R. Bihy wrote:
I think you better cool off. You don't seem very stable, better go and take your medicine. Have a nice day!
Yeah, now you'll resort to personal attacks, and you think that *I* should be the one to cool down, and take medicines?
And oh, you have a nice day too, you sick old fart. 
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: And oh, you have a nice day too, you sick old fart
That one made me laugh. 
Thanks Rajesh!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
When I typed that, I was sure that some people may laugh reading it. But I swear to God, I wasn't expecting *you* to be among them. 
But hey, I'm glad you laughed anyways.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Turn my back for 5 minutes, and world war 3 has started in the thread..........
You lot must be bored for a Sunday. (At least Top Gear is on in an hour and an 'alf.)
Oh, I never voted anyone so don't know why I got dragged into the uni-voting!
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Turn my back for 5 minutes, and world war 3 has started in the thread..........
It could be even worse. "You gotta keep one eye looking over your shoulder", always.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I was browsing recent C# unanswered questions, and came across a question reported as having been updated 22 hours ago[^].
Opening the question, I find it was asked in March, 2009, and the most recent solution offered in Dec. 2010, and the most recent comment made on a solution made in Dec. 2010.
There's no visual evidence of any editing, or change. The person listed as the updater's name does not appear anywhere in the question, as solution provider, or commentor.
Wondering what the person listed as having updated the question actually did, and why this question has been 'propelled' into the status of "recent."
thanks, Bill
"In the River of Delights, Panic has not failed me." Jorge Luis Borges
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that was me deleting an entry by a spammer.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe this question[^] should be deleted.
Too much of heaven can bring you underground
Heaven can always turn around
Too much of heaven, our life is all hell bound
Heaven, the kill that makes no sound
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
Too much of heaven can bring you underground
Heaven can always turn around
Too much of heaven, our life is all hell bound
Heaven, the kill that makes no sound
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Nuked like the Duke.
You mean it took you 15 years?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
I am using CodeProject for just 5 months.With in 5 months it helps me very much.
It is a ocean of knowledge and Teacher for solutions.It is best site for Developers.
I want to suggest that there should be a container in this website that can contains questions (that are not answered).Ecah user can see their container of questions.
Benifits of container:
>User does not need to search question.
>User just click a button and add question in their own container.
You can give the name to the container as question BASKET.
|
|
|
|
|
How would that help anybody?
If you are looking to answer questions, then there is already a "Unanswered" list: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/List.aspx?tab=unanswered[^]
If you are looking to ask a question, then surely searching first is simply a good idea? If the question has been asked, then perhaps that will give you the answer straight away.
You already have two lists under your profile: "My Questions" and "My Answers" so how is adding more lists going to help?
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
On my "My Settings" page under the "Settings" tab my profile photo crosses the border. I dont know if it is made intentionally or not. (Using IE8.0)
|
|
|
|
|
The joy that is IE8. Fixing now. I'll deploy the new bits first thing next week.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like if the question has been rated 5-stared at least once, when you want to see the rating details(the box that appears when you mouse over the rating stars),rating details for the question it has to be aligned slightly to the left because the ratings for 5 dissappears because of the sponsored links or it can appear on top of the links. (Using IE8.0)
modified on Friday, July 29, 2011 7:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Not loving IE8.
Fixed, and will upload the bits soon.
Thanks for the report.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
FYI It seems like the problem still exists. I dont know if you uploaded the bits or not tho. Seems like IE8 is not loving CP it is being resistent not to change LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Using IE6 / W2K, the New Message / Reply page does not show any of the emoticons on the right side of the text entry box as of a few days ago. FF4 / W2K is OK.
Steve
_________________
I C(++) therefore I am
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Mayfield wrote: IE6
You sure you aren't just confusing left with right again? Here, take this sippy cup and run along now. 
Martin Fowler wrote: Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll try and find time, but IE6 support is now on a "if I can find the time for it after midnight" basis.
Out of curiosity, are you on W2K out of choice or necessity?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
