|
I was actually interested in the relative performance, just wondered if you had done anything on this ...
>> If performance is indeed critical, we would most likely go with C++ and unmanaged code
So would I actually ...
>> So, in conclusion, as long as SharePoint saves our customer's money,
>> and we deliver what they expect, they will still go for it. And we will have to follow.
Good and valid points
Regards
Espen Harlinn
Espen Harlinn
Senior Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services
|
|
|
|
|
There is no good alternative to traditional database in fast development, where less data is not in TB's. I think we will remain will SQL.
***** Programme comme si dept soutien technique. est plein de tueurs en série et ils savent adresse de votre domicile. *****
|
|
|
|
|
Does RDBMS stand for:
Request Drinking Before Mind Sleeping? 
should we answer "ay", we have no choice but keep it that way!
SkyWalker
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about that. Most big web apps like Facebook are using NoSQL databases. RDBMS are too slow.
|
|
|
|
|
JPs criteria was for < 1tb, that does not describe big in todays database world.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, actually now that I read a bit more about it Facebook seems to use a combination of different types of database
|
|
|
|
|
We have CListCtrl: why would we need RDBMS? 
Unless... Really Delicious BACON Management System? Two slices of bread, some butter, and a little bit of brown sauce? <Slurp! />
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
I never got the CListCtrl joke [template]... where can I find more about it?
|
|
|
|
|
I could tell you...but then I'd have to kill you.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
I go for RDBMS with Rapid Application Development.
Systems with Large amount of data and high OLTP operations will require or move to Non-RDBMS solutions.
// ♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
// 99 bugs in the code
// We fix a bug, compile it again
// 101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
|
I care to differ on rapid application development point you make, having a table first mind set hinders speed, and has been drummed into us over the decades since the advent of RDBMs. Its just painful for initial development and even more for maintenance work on a deployed application.
The only main reason to go for RDBMs at the moment is if you require millisecond concurrency of all your data. i.e. all your data is valid for a delta time of around a millisecond.
Take a look at me RaptorDB [^]article, its the first step towards a document store database which I'm working on.
Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager
|
|
|
|
|
Good Point!
Reading the Article.
Cheers. 
// ♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
// 99 bugs in the code
// We fix a bug, compile it again
// 101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
|
thank you, it was very learning and helpful for me.
Avinash S. Godse
|
|
|
|
|
yipee i voted first 
modified on Wednesday, June 1, 2011 10:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
and I am the first voter of your Post.
|
|
|
|
|
I have participated in just about every single poll for years but I don't think I have ever made it first. Top ten, yes.
John
|
|
|
|
|
Y is everyone voting me down 
I am already 100 points down for this 
|
|
|
|
|
|
saxenaabhi6 wrote: Y is everyone voting me down
I am already 100 points down for this
The reason you are being downvoted is because we don't care that you were the first voter.
--
** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter.
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
you should have not downvoted if you REALLY don't care
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't down vote you.
--
** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter.
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
Because shouting "First!" is juvenile and retarded.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I just said I voted first because it happens very rare thats it...
Please tell me what's so offensive or retard in it ? the only thing is that my post does not comply with the poll topic for which i accept 3/5 at most.
get life guys....
If some mvp would have commented the same, all down voters would have been voting 5 happily..
anyways removing my post, no hard feelings.. cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
saxenaabhi6 wrote: If some mvp would have commented the same,
No MVP would put up a "Me first!" post, this isn't that sort of site.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
