JQuery to Mootools - JavaScript Discussion Boards

Re: "waiting message" before complete loading ??

dcode2522-May-11 12:00

22-May-11 12:00

Please could you be more precise , because i'm not very familiar with javascript.
My sricpt is :

----------------
---------------
-----------------

Where to put or to use readystate ? I have a animated gif "wait.gif" ? how to use this until the script is loaded ?

Thank You !

Re: "waiting message" before complete loading ??

thatraja22-May-11 16:19

thatraja

22-May-11 16:19

You can find many in Google.
'Loading - Please wait' Message Display Script[^]

thatraja

My Tip/Tricks
My Dad had a Heart Attack on this day so don't...

Re: "waiting message" before complete loading ??

dcode2523-May-11 5:13

dcode25

23-May-11 5:13

this is for whole page.
i have a script in specific position on the page.and on this position i want to display a "waiting message" until the script full loads.

Window.open Help

salmonraju19-May-11 20:29

salmonraju

19-May-11 20:29

Hi,
I have an application that uses frames.

I am calling a method in parent frame as below.(below method is in child frame)

function my MyChild()
{
var pth = window.location.href;
//http://localhost/Main/SUB/Child.aspx[^]

parent.frames["MainFrame"].MainMethod();

}

below is my function in parent Frame, and I am trying to open a new window but that is opening new page in child location
I am using below code , is ter any way so that I can track the URL it is trying to open.

function MainMethod()
{
var path=window.location.href; //below is the value
//http://localhost/Main/Parent.aspx[^]
window.open("Newpage.aspx");
//it is opening in http://localhost/Main/SUB/NewPage.aspx[^]
But I am expecting it will open in http://localhost/Main/NewPage.aspx[^]

}

Please suggest how Can i get the URl path it is trying to open, since window.location.href is giving differnt value.

Thanks,

Re: Window.open Help

twseitex22-May-11 10:19

twseitex

22-May-11 10:19

Helo,
why you need var pth and var path ?
This vars are not in use !
Cu.

how to set focus again on drop down after pressing down key

Syed Salman Raza Zaidi16-May-11 21:53

Syed Salman Raza Zaidi

16-May-11 21:53

how to set focus again on drop down after pressing down key ?

Re: how to set focus again on drop down after pressing down key

twseitex19-May-11 10:33

twseitex

19-May-11 10:33

If it is possible use method fireEvent().
If fireEvent() and or focus() are not possible, you can't create an event.
See Properties of parent of object.

JQuery to Mootools

mehrdadc4814-May-11 18:14

mehrdadc48

14-May-11 18:14

Hi,
Can anybody help me converting this jquery code into mootools, please?

$("#" + '<%= txtInput.ClientID %>').parent().find(".textboxlist-bit-box-deletebutton").each(function(){
$(this).click();
});

Best wishes

Re: JQuery to Mootools

DaveAuld15-May-11 1:41

DaveAuld

15-May-11 1:41

Breaking it down;

Find ObjectA
Get Parent(Object B) of ObjectA
Get all Child objects (CollectionA) of ObjectB where they contain .textboxlist-bit-box-deletebutton
For each member (this) of CollectionA execute the click() method.

As for the exact syntax to MooTools, i'll pass, as haven't used it yet! Smile | :)

Dave
Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn

Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

JavaScript Framework

Md. Marufuzzaman11-May-11 8:30

Md. Marufuzzaman

11-May-11 8:30

Hi All:

I trying to shorted out top 10 JavaScript Framework, Could you guys help me on that.

1. jQuery
2. MooTools
3. Protorype
4. Dojo Toolkit
5. Script.aculo
6. Qooxdoo
.
.
.
.
Confused | :confused:

Thanks
Md. Marufuzzaman

I will not say I have failed 1000 times; I will say that I have discovered 1000 ways that can cause failure – Thomas Edison.

Re: JavaScript Framework

DaveAuld11-May-11 8:39

DaveAuld

11-May-11 8:39

Three.js (Which i only found out about a few days ago!)

Dave
Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn

Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

Re: JavaScript Framework

Md. Marufuzzaman11-May-11 9:22

Md. Marufuzzaman

11-May-11 9:22

Thanks.... Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

Thanks
Md. Marufuzzaman

I will not say I have failed 1000 times; I will say that I have discovered 1000 ways that can cause failure – Thomas Edison.

Re: JavaScript Framework

AjeetPrabhakar16-May-11 19:16

AjeetPrabhakar

16-May-11 19:16

Could you tell me pls what is this three.js ? how it's work.

Re: JavaScript Framework

DaveAuld16-May-11 19:41

DaveAuld

16-May-11 19:41

https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js[^]

Dave
Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn

Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

Re: JavaScript Framework

Manfred Rudolf Bihy12-May-11 22:41

Manfred Rudolf Bihy

12-May-11 22:41

Nr 3. should be Prototype and not Protorype.

I wouldn't actually list Script.aculo.us as a framework of it's own right. The last time I saw and made us of it it was for effects and tightly knit with Prototype. Any pointers to the contrary are welcome.

Cheers!

Re: JavaScript Framework

Ankur^\m/16-May-11 20:38

Ankur^\m/

16-May-11 20:38

YUI[^]
A couple more here and their comparison - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/394601/which-javascript-framework-jquery-vs-dojo-vs[^]

HTH! Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

..Go Green..

eval() Vs setTimeout()

Ali Al Omairi(Abu AlHassan)10-May-11 3:37

Ali Al Omairi(Abu AlHassan)

10-May-11 3:37

guys;
what is deference between eval('somecode();'); and setTimeout('somecode();', 0);?

thanks;

Help people,so poeple can help you.

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

Pete O'Hanlon10-May-11 3:57

Pete O'Hanlon

10-May-11 3:57

Functionally, in this case, there is no real effective difference in their behaviour as far as the end result goes. Historically, eval has been a real resource hog because it would start up a new instance of the JS compiler (similarly, the same issue as setTimeout or setInterval), but newer JS compilers have become much better at caching the eval compilation so this overhead isn't as bad.

Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

Manfred Rudolf Bihy12-May-11 22:42

Manfred Rudolf Bihy

12-May-11 22:42

d'accord! 5+

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

AspDotNetDev14-May-11 22:44

AspDotNetDev

14-May-11 22:44

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
Functionally, in this case, there is no real effective difference in their behaviour as far as the end result goes

There is one difference, which this example demonstrates:

HTML

<html>
	<head>
		<title>Eval / setTimeout</title>
		<script type="text/javascript">
			// Uncomment one of the below lines... one will work and one will not.
			//setTimeout("document.getElementById('myDiv').innerHTML = 'changed';", 0);
			//eval("document.getElementById('myDiv').innerHTML = 'changed';");
		</script>
	</head>
	<body>
		<div id="myDiv">unchanged</div>
	</body>
</html>

C++

S<T>::f(U) // Out of line.

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

Ankur^\m/16-May-11 20:42

Ankur^\m/

16-May-11 20:42

AspDotNetDev wrote:
// Uncomment one of the below lines... one will work and one will not.

I didn't get your point here. Of course the un-commented line will work and the commented won't. Confused | :confused:

..Go Green..

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

AspDotNetDev16-May-11 20:46

AspDotNetDev

16-May-11 20:46

Lol, I'm not sure if you are joking. What I meant was, uncomment one line at a time. That leaves two scenarios. Only one of those scenarios will function properly. More specifically, the scenario in which you uncomment the eval line will not function. The scenario in which you uncomment the setTimeout line will function properly.

[Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET]

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

Ankur^\m/16-May-11 20:58

Ankur^\m/

16-May-11 20:58

No, I wasn't joking. I just tested it. The eval one is not working. I haven't used eval ever, so I didn't know about it, until now. Smile | :)

Thanks!

..Go Green..

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

AspDotNetDev16-May-11 21:02

AspDotNetDev

16-May-11 21:02

Yeah, the reason eval doesn't work is because "myDiv" isn't created yet, and eval tries to immediately evaluate code that references that element. Using setTimeout seems to put the function call onto a procession queue so that it gets called once the current operation (loading the HTML) is complete.

[Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET]

Re: eval() Vs setTimeout()

Ankur^\m/16-May-11 21:15

Ankur^\m/

16-May-11 21:15

AspDotNetDev wrote:
<layer>Yeah, the reason eval doesn't work is because "myDiv" isn't created yet, and eval tries to immediately evaluate code that references that element.

Correct! And if you move the script after the body tag, both will work.

AspDotNetDev wrote:
Using setTimeout seems to put the function call onto a procession queue so that it gets called once the current operation (loading the HTML) is complete.

Yeah, it seems the function is executed only after the whole HTML is loaded.

..Go Green..

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.