|
oh my god it my apologies I haven't read your comment. but why you commented there[^]
you can comment there[^]
right now i have read your comment and replayed back
Sandeep Mewara wrote: I can maximum apologize and delete my answer if that satisfies you
there is no need to delete your answer i was wrong that I pinned you.
please forgive me Sandeep I am taking you wrong.
modified on Monday, January 10, 2011 10:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
RaviRanjankr wrote: please forgive me sandeep I am taking you wrong.
I feeling very guilty please forgive me.
Dude, you didn't do anything wrong 
Sandeep has honestly apologized to you, so the best you can do is to accept his apology and move on.
This is a programming forum, not a soap drama! 
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: This is a programming forum, not a soap drama!
oh! thanks Nish to let me know this is programming forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: This is a programming forum, not a soap drama!
Are you sure?
The header says "It is not for programming or other questions."
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that explains it then
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
This is a programming forum, not a soap drama
It was fun while it lasted
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Is this link (found under the reputation graph) only available for certain users? I've found several fairly new users that don't have it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you are only supposed to be able to see your own. You shouldn't be able to see mine, for instance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
John's talking about the proxy accounts he uses to have a fight with when no one else is available. 
|
|
|
|
|
He sock puppets himself into anger!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience it comes and goes. Yesterday, I did not get it on my rep tab, today it is there.
Anyway I think it is not in the right place, as I often want it, without needing the graph (and the load it causes); so I made it a favorite. I would suggest Chris splits the rep tab into a rep graph tab and a rep history tab.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, I modified the URL to point to your member ID (http://www.codeproject.com/script/Reputation/List.aspx?mid=648011), but it still showed my reputation history rather than yours. I don't think I should ever be able to see your reputation history, but it seems like a flaw that the member ID is included in the query string when that information is not used.
|
|
|
|
|
That tells me the mid parameter is meaningful for some (CP staff I'd say), and gets ignored for others. And/or there is a hidden agenda, see how the thread evolves...
The page remains empty when not logged in.
And the original page and URL had additional controls and parameters (sd,ed), they now are absent/invisible and ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: hidden agenda,
Absolutely.
The parameter is there for admins so they can view graphs from all accounts. It's ignored for non-admins.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Fire me the ID of an account that can't see it and I'll investigate. The basic logic is:
IF you're logged in and viewing your own profile, the link is there.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/144646/PHP-code-question.aspx[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks - removed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
is it just me, or did we fold time today? I have seen CP version 2.3.110107.1 this weekend, this morning it was 2.3.110104.1, and now it is 2.3.110110.3 Pretty strange.
|
|
|
|
|
This morning (your time) I used an older version file simply because it was handy. The update I just completed mere minutes ago used a more officially sanctioned, hamster approved, fresh out of the wrapper version file.
Way, way too much attention to detail, Luc
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
*Someone* has to keep an eye on you guys...
BTW, how close is Luc's bug page to your own?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
The correlation should be modest, there are parts of CP I don't use, and not all bugs I detect have equal importance to me. My list holds the ones I care about and want to track progress of.
|
|
|
|
|
Quite different by a factor of about 50. One of the things I'm doing today is going through our list and throwing out the pie-in-the-sky ideas, and bringing to the top the really annoying and hopefully quick to fix issues. Cleanup time.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You really shouldn't do that, version numbers should be absolutely trustworthy.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
