|
In my experience it comes and goes. Yesterday, I did not get it on my rep tab, today it is there.
Anyway I think it is not in the right place, as I often want it, without needing the graph (and the load it causes); so I made it a favorite. I would suggest Chris splits the rep tab into a rep graph tab and a rep history tab.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, I modified the URL to point to your member ID (http://www.codeproject.com/script/Reputation/List.aspx?mid=648011), but it still showed my reputation history rather than yours. I don't think I should ever be able to see your reputation history, but it seems like a flaw that the member ID is included in the query string when that information is not used.
|
|
|
|
|
That tells me the mid parameter is meaningful for some (CP staff I'd say), and gets ignored for others. And/or there is a hidden agenda, see how the thread evolves...
The page remains empty when not logged in.
And the original page and URL had additional controls and parameters (sd,ed), they now are absent/invisible and ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: hidden agenda,
Absolutely. 
The parameter is there for admins so they can view graphs from all accounts. It's ignored for non-admins.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Fire me the ID of an account that can't see it and I'll investigate. The basic logic is:
IF you're logged in and viewing your own profile, the link is there.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/144646/PHP-code-question.aspx[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks - removed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
is it just me, or did we fold time today? I have seen CP version 2.3.110107.1 this weekend, this morning it was 2.3.110104.1, and now it is 2.3.110110.3 Pretty strange.
|
|
|
|
|
This morning (your time) I used an older version file simply because it was handy. The update I just completed mere minutes ago used a more officially sanctioned, hamster approved, fresh out of the wrapper version file.
Way, way too much attention to detail, Luc 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
*Someone* has to keep an eye on you guys...
BTW, how close is Luc's bug page to your own?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
The correlation should be modest, there are parts of CP I don't use, and not all bugs I detect have equal importance to me. My list holds the ones I care about and want to track progress of.
|
|
|
|
|
Quite different by a factor of about 50. One of the things I'm doing today is going through our list and throwing out the pie-in-the-sky ideas, and bringing to the top the really annoying and hopefully quick to fix issues. Cleanup time.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You really shouldn't do that, version numbers should be absolutely trustworthy.
|
|
|
|
|
And you thought I was anal.
5 for that level of QA.
|
|
|
|
|
Is the Participant count still broken? It says I have 929 points. Based on the description, I get:
50 points for the newsletter opt-in (Is the Daily Insider not included?);
1 point for posting a comment (Commenting where exactly? The Lounge?);
1 point for signing in each day (Although for some days I don't see that.);
100 points for signing up (May or may not include 1 point for signing in since new is the very first in.);
5 points for voting in a survey.
Based on these, every new member should have 100 points.
929 - 100 - 50 - 5*(maybe a dozen surveys) = 700-ish points.
Based on the number of years I've been here (10 years), I expect this to be much higher. There was a year or two when I went back to school and was less active, but still.
|
|
|
|
|
We only have (and are counting) sign-in data for the last couple of years, though a future update will extend that back to when you joined. Comments mean comments posted in Quick Answers. In the initial recalc done last night these were not added. They are currently being added now and should be done in 2-4hrs.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We only have (and are counting) sign-in data for the last couple of years, though a future update will extend that back to when you joined.
Good to know. Although I assume you have the data, just not in the current database or something since you wouldn't be able to recreate things out of thin air. Unless you're using posts, comments, and logs to reverse-engineer all that info. 
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Unless you're using posts, comments, and logs to reverse-engineer all that info
Pretty much
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Pretty much
Ain't nothing pretty about that. Good luck. I call dibs on left-over points.
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you just make it a point for every day of membership (and maybe raise the bar for color change for Participant). That's easier/faster to calculate.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
{Kramer] Why don't you just tell me how many points you'd like? [/Kramer]
|
|
|
|
|
If I did then there would be howls of complaint about members who sign up and do nothing getting points.
BTW: I've spent the day going through the mind bending code that trawls our logs to recreate rep events and I found the missing organiser points: they were points earned by reporting articles, not points from editing. Editing points should all be there (and are not organiser points, in any case - no idea what I was thinking when I said that). I'm not 100% that I can recover all, since we have an open bug regarding recording of who reports what article, but I found enough and will also be comparing the points to Friday's database backup just to scrape back every last point I can.
I've also added in some very rough attempts at guessing sign-ins that will boost your participation, at the expense of waiting another day for this to finish.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Monday, January 10, 2011 9:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Out of curiousity, what are you using to parse the logs? Analog.cx, LogParser, etc.?
|
|
|
|
|
Everything (except for one thing) is stored in a database so simple queries (and some ferocious processing) is all that is required.
The exception is article file downloads. IIS logs get parsed by our homebrew parser.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
