|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: it's common sense. I cannot think of workplaces where people would want to sit and watch giant wooden penises. But because you say, I'd assume it's fine at your workplace.
Honestly from a north american perspective here I can't imagine a Nunnery where that would be anything other than a giggle at worst. It's a legitimate festival of fertility. If I post a picture of the statue of David in relation to a discussion about it in the lounge will you be up in arms because his penis is visible?
Clearly standards are different for every person on earth which is why there is a broad category of stuff that is pretty commonly accepted as not safe for work like pornography and violent images, audio with loud profanity on it. The rest varies greatly by culture and it's simply impossible to police.
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: res of GIANT PENIS for Chri'sake...
Ironically the "Chri'sake part of your statement would be considered extremely objectionable and not safe for work by a great many people, more I suspect than would be offended by a Japanese fertility festival. It just goes to show that beyond a certain point it's impossible to set any kind of ground rules and the kid sister rule never made any sense anyway for just this reason.
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: I'm ONLY complaining about a post, that may potentially not be work-safe everywhere.
And the poster flagged it as *exactly* that potentially not safe for work. Once you read that why did you simply not ignore it and move on?
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better.
- Poul Anderson
|
|
|
|
|
John C wrote: If I post a picture of the statue of David in relation to a discussion about it in the lounge will you be up in arms because his penis is visible?
Are you doing this for the sake of argument? Anyways, the answer is: "common sense".
John C wrote: And the poster flagged it as *exactly* that potentially not safe for work. Once you read that why did you simply not ignore it and move on?
That was my point. When he knew that it's objectionable, and potentially not safe for work, he need not have posted it in the lounge! Thank you.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: so I'm done with this here.
and yet you're still arguing with him.  3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Is there an auto-cleaner that automatically deletes unanswered questions after a certain time period? If not, there probably should be, and it should be set for something like 60 days..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
That is an excellent idea.
[Edit] Is this specifically for the case where you have a narrow filter set (say, Quick-Basic) and the 'unanswered questions' page is filled with old, old questions?cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Shh...don't encourage him!  ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I would also suggest to remove those Q&A that has 2-3 (or more) votes of 1. (Or some other reasonable way of identifying it!)
At times, there are questions that are downvoted by multiple users but also has some answer.
Just having an answer must not be the criteria for a question to enter into the repository. They too should be filtered out to have a healthy Q&A repository.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of this:
If a question (any question) has gone longer than 60 days without a response by anyone other the original poster, it gets deleted. Period. There's really no point in keeping old questions around if nobody is going to answer them, and I figured 60 days was long enough to wait. We got some stuff hanging around that dates back to November of last year....45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
But what if the OP found the answer to his/her question and posts it? This is (or at least should) be a common case.
But your general idea is good. I'll create a task to clean up questions that haven't been answered in over 60 days or so.
|
|
|
|
|
Why John, that is something you can easily solve yourself by providing some answer; even a simple "I don't know, did you Google?" would remove the question from the unanswered list.
|
|
|
|
|
That would give an entry to that question (that has no related answer) into the repository! Still not good...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm talking about the official CP staff that edit articles (if there still is anyone that does this on staff).
I would simply go insane if I had to do that all frakking day.
Maybe we could get a feature that let us apply the CP style to an article we're editing that removes ANYTHING that decortaes an otherwise normal tag, eliminates escaped space characters, and other crap that new members seem to always put in their articles...
I saw one today where the guy use the <h5> tag instead of <p>, and number of other articles thatinlcude paragraph and line feed tags in <pre> blocks.
I'm surprised these people have been authorized to breath on their own, much less write code..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
| You...get used to it. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
If you're implying Smitha, Deeksha and myself are unsung heroes, then I implore you:
Sing us a song  Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Be careful what you wish for ...
|
|
|
|
|
While going through the post below[^]... i found that page repload when i click on messages for WPF/WCF/WF (Forum)
Whereas it is normal client side div open for messages in other forums. (no full page reload)
Is this known?
Environment: IE7
|
|
|
|
|
| I'm not seeing this myself. Is it still happening? cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
For now, I am facing another issue specifically with this particular forum!
My page does not fully renders and I am unable to see messages.
Done F5 & Cntrl+F5 multiple times but same result! Unable to verify the page load thing for now 
Taken couple of screenshots if you need.
|
|
|
|
|
| If you could send the screenshots that would be good. It doesn't sound like a caching issue so forcing an uncached reload (Ctrl+F5) won't help. I've wandered all around that forum and can't see anything my end, but send me the shots and I'll see if I can sleuth this one. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sent! both to you and webmaster email id!
|
|
|
|
|
This one[^]
Not sure if he is breaking any rules / laws but he sure as hell is getting on the nervs of people
|
|
|
|
|
Sort of technical enquiry spamming!
|
|
|
|
|
I just voted to remove a message (doesn't happen much but well this one deserved it )
And I got this:
You or someone at your IP address has been voting too often. Please wait a moment and try again
Granted I did vote 2 message's before that (of the same person and for the same reason, completely wrong messages)
So am I to understand there is a voting threshold of only 2 votes in a given time?
|
|
|
|
|
Happened to me once as well - but that was a week or so ago.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
It happens when your votes come too close together (it's happened to me a couple of thimes in the last few days). This was implemented to prevent univoting. If they have to wait between votes, they may lose interest in the process. Unfortunately, it sometimes spills over into normal site usage..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
