|
Hi,
How can i get free jsp source code for scheduling-calendar like "google calendar",where we can add schedules as events..
Thank you
Sanuji
|
|
|
|
|
Google?
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
what i mean is google-calendar where we can add events...
|
|
|
|
|
The answer is still Google; type in your search criteria (calendar jsp-ajax javascript) and see what it finds.
|
|
|
|
|
At least one person knew what I meant 
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It's quite frightening really ... these are the people whose products will be in the shops a year from now.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: products will be in the shops a year from now.
Only if we keep helping them 
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: these are the people whose products will be in the shops a year from now.
And they'll be referring any complaints about the quality of their product to CP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi , I am a newbie in HTML/Asp .
I am developing a simple site about DB creation/management.
I want that, when I click a button on my main page , another page appears without being appended to the main one (that is, I want the main one not to appear anymore). I found that using a Redirect to another .asp, different from the one containing the main page,
works fine : but, what if I want to send the new page directly using a Response.Write () statement ? I've seen that, this way there's no chance to prevent the browser from appending the new page to the main one ...
|
|
|
|
|
tiwal wrote: I want to send the new page directly using a Response.Write () statement ? I've seen that, this way there's no chance to prevent the browser from appending the new page to the main one
Duh, RTFM. Response.Write writes directly to the response stream, of course it going to append or insert any content 
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
so , what should I do to "refresh" the current page to the new one without using Redirect ?
|
|
|
|
|
This is a ridiculous request. You can't. You can only update a portion of the page, unless you are using Response.Write for the entire main page, which would be foolish.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure you can say it is "ridiculous" ?
and can you explain me why ??
|
|
|
|
|
tiwal wrote: Are you sure you can say it is "ridiculous" ?
Yes, it's ridiculous. There, that's twice now. 
tiwal wrote: and can you explain me why ??
If you have to ask, you wouldn't understand even if it were explained.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
the typical easy answer of the incompetent ...
You'd better answer "because I don't know" ....
What I can/can't understand you don't know (one of the many things it seems...)
Better take care about wha YOU can't understand ....
|
|
|
|
|
tiwal wrote: You'd better answer "because I don't know" ..
That is your response. You have proven it many times here.
If you can't be civil and follow the rules of this community then go away.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Hello folks,
I can send an e-mail from my web-server like so:
SmtpClient mailClient = new SmtpClient();
mailClient.Send(some defined mail);
I'm however unsure as to the security in this. If someone should gain access to the machine, and it's set up to allow the above, wouldn't this mean the attacker would be able to use the server as a spam-bot?
Many, many thanks for your input (and possible a great link explaining the reasoning behind it),
Morten
|
|
|
|
|
harleydk wrote: allow the above, wouldn't this mean the attacker would be able to use the server as a spam-bot?
All the code you showed is doing is sending an email using the smtpclient, it doesn't expose anything. The SMPT server itself must be configured properly.
SMTP Server Setup (IIS 6.0)[^]
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Are the two machines on the same domain? If so you will automatically have extra permissions locally.
|
|
|
|
|
Can someone please help with the CSS for this navigation bar.
I am trying to have drop down lists on my navigation bar but can't seem to view the drop down lists when a link is hovered over, keeping the style and format of my HTML page.
The HTML is as below
<div id="nav">
<ul>
<li><a href="index.html">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="activities.html">Activities</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="manga.html">La Manga</a></li>
<li><a href="marina.html">Marina</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="attraction.html">Attractions</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="cartagena.html">Cartagena</a></li>
<li><a href="murcia.html">Murcia</a></li>
<li><a href="pagan.html">Lo Pagan<a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="contact.html">Contact Us</a></li>
<li><a href="book.html">Book Now</a></li>
</ul>
And the CSS:
#nav {
clear:left;
float:left;
width:150px;
height:132px;
margin 0 10px 0;
padding ;
}
#nav li ul{
display:none
}
#nav ul {
list-style:none;
width:150px;
margin 0 20px 0;
padding ;
}
#nav li {
margin-bottom:5px;
}
#nav li a {
font-weight:bold;
height:20px;
text-decoration:none;
display:block;
padding:6px 0 0 10px;
border-top:1px solid #d7d7d7;
border-right:1px solid #d7d7d7;
border-bottom:1px solid #d7d7d7;
border-left:1px solid #d7d7d7;
}
#nav li a:hover{
border-top:1px solid #000000;
border-right:1px solid #000000;
border-bottom:1px solid #000000;
border-left:1px solid #000000;
}
|
|
|
|
|
your outer layer "nav" has a fixed height - so anything that get shown on hover, may not be visible. You thought of using javascript? - especially jquery - It might make your life easier.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not too familiar with javascript, do you mind please pointing me in the right direction.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our web app sends out an email from time to time, which contains a link to log the user into the app (we're using forms authentication, but I don't think that's relevant to this problem.)
The scenario is as follows...in the link, which is a standard HTML anchor tag, we specify _target='OurFrameName'....if IE isn't open, then this correctly opens IE, and navigates to the correct place. If IE is open, and already logged in to the app, then again, this is fine - it takes over the tab and navigates to the right place. However, if we have (for instance) one page open on www.google.com, and the other to our app, then if our app is the ACTIVE tab, it works correctly, but if google is active, it takes over this tab, replaces google and leaves us with 2 instances of our app - which obviously causes problems with session etc.
As I undrestood it, this is the behaviour that we should be seeing with _target="top", but since we're specifying a frame name, it should look through the available tabs, take over an appropriate one if present, and if not spawn a new tab.
The added confusion is that if I save the email to HTML format, then open it in IE, then it functions exactly as I would expect - so I think it's something to do with the link being in an email that's displayed in Outlook...it's almost as if the link's only looking in Outlook's "IE", not finding the correct frame, and hence opening a new tab, which then opens in "actual IE"....
Anyone have any ideas as to what I could do to force the behaviour we need? I've tried various Tab options in IE (always open new etc), but nothing seems to make much of a difference, and there appears to be nothing in Outlook to help to control this...
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
