Hardware & Devices

Richard MacCutchan2-Nov-09 22:33

2-Nov-09 22:33

Bram van Kampen wrote:
You Don't seem to understand what I'm trying to achieve.

You want a time reference that nobody can mess with.

Bram van Kampen wrote:
This is a Hardware Forum, So I am looking for links for a piece of Hardware

Actually it's a Hardware & Devices forum. Any system that acts as a time server is, ultimately, a hardware device, even if it uses software to interface with.

Roger Wright11-Nov-09 18:23

Roger Wright

11-Nov-09 18:23

Schweitzer Electric Laboratories (www.selinc.com) makes a device that provides GPS time codes in IRIG format for just this purpose. Their market is the power industry, keeping devices in remote substations synchronized, but there's no reason that other industries can't use their stuff.

"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"

Bram van Kampen12-Nov-09 15:05

12-Nov-09 15:05

Thanks for the Reply.

This does not realy answer my question. For Starters, there is no specific requirement of accuracy, other than One day per Anum. What I'm realy looking for is a piece of hardware with the following spec:-

- The Time settings should NOT be able to be changed, other
than by keypad.
- Ability to run Entirely independent of any form of External Dataprovider.
- No Larger than say 200x100x50 Deep.
- Simple 16 key Numeric Keypad to set the time.
- Wired Network Connector to facilitate Software Time Queeries.
- Battery Backup, to maintain the time upon Mains powerfailure.
- Inability to be 'Set' through any Networking Port.

I am sort of amazed that a thing like this does not seem to exist.

Smile | :)

Bram van Kampen

Bram van Kampen15-Nov-09 16:19

15-Nov-09 16:19

Hi,

Thanks,

Found an Intermediate Solution.
-Bougtht a Very Very old PC with XP on it for £10.00 in a Car Boot Sale.(original Hardware Spec: Win95)
- Got Dumy Terminals so that it can fireup without keyboard or Monitor.
-Modified module config files so as to look for that computer for timestamps.
-Wiped Most of the User Programs, like MS Office, etc.
- Locked the thing in a Cabinet at the Users premises.

Works a dream! I had hoped however, that there would be an ethernet device or USB Device which would do this more elegantly.

Regards,

Bram van Kampen

Bram van Kampen15-Nov-09 16:19

15-Nov-09 16:19

Hi,

Thanks,

Found an Intermediate Solution.

-Bougtht a Very Very old PC with XP on it for £10.00 in a Car Boot Sale.(original Hardware Spec: Win95)
- Got Dumy Terminals so that it can fireup without keyboard or Monitor.
-Modified module config files so as to look for that computer for timestamps.
-Wiped Most of the User Programs, like MS Office, etc.
- Locked the thing in a Cabinet at the Users premises.

Works a dream! I had hoped however, that there would be an ethernet device or USB Device which would do this more elegantly.

Regards,

Bram van Kampen

thread

anooshe31-Oct-09 7:49

anooshe

31-Oct-09 7:49

how do i get code for CSMA/CD protocol with c#

Re: thread

Richard MacCutchan31-Oct-09 10:39

Which one could be the best buy?

31-Oct-09 10:39

anooshe wrote:
how do i get code for CSMA/CD protocol with c#

You don't! Please at least learn the basics of the subject before asking questions. You obviously have no idea what CSMA/CD is.

Tiger45630-Oct-09 22:05

Tiger456

30-Oct-09 22:05

I'm planning to buy a laptop. As I haven't owned a laptop before, would like to know the best laptop to buy with following criteria's in mind:

1. Main target is to do programming with Microsoft Technologies (VS2008/21010, SQL Server etc..)
2. Less than or equal $670
3. Better performance
4. Flexible to upgrade
6. Doesn't matter on Size and weight ( Smile | :)

i am healthy enough to carry)
7. Doesn't matter on maintainence and support (As i am buying from US, but not belong to US)

Jörgen Andersson30-Oct-09 23:14

30-Oct-09 23:14

Tiger456 wrote:
1. Main target is to do programming with Microsoft Technologies (VS2008/21010, SQL Server etc..)

So you need lots of memory and a seriously fast HD, preferably solid state.

Tiger456 wrote:
2. Less than or equal $670

Ok forget the harddrive, and add the memory yourself after buying it.

Tiger456 wrote:
3. Better performance

See number 1.

Tiger456 wrote:
4. Flexible to upgrade

Are you sure you want a laptop?

Tiger456 wrote:
6. Doesn't matter on Size and weight ( i am healthy enough to carry)

I've heard that one before, heavy laptops tend to be stationary, really, they do!

Tiger456 wrote:
7. Doesn't matter on maintainence and support (As i am buying from US, but not belong to US)

If you're buying a brand laptop you'll get the support worldwide whether you want it or not.

Richard MacCutchan31-Oct-09 0:00

31-Oct-09 0:00

Take a look here[^]. It's a UK based site but some of the information is likely to cover PCs that are available worldwide.

Bram van Kampen31-Oct-09 15:56

31-Oct-09 15:56

No one has ever been sacked for buying IBM, or so they say.
Our Organisation owns 13 Laptops. 3 of those are Second Hand IBM's. When it comes to Support and Standard of Mechanical design, IBM wins Everytime.

Smile | :)

Bram van Kampen

Richard MacCutchan31-Oct-09 22:19

31-Oct-09 22:19

IBM sold their PC business some years ago, I think to Aptiva.

Henry Minute1-Nov-09 11:32

Henry Minute

1-Nov-09 11:32

Richard MacCutchan wrote:
I think to Aptiva

Lenovo, at least for their Laptops.

Henry Minute

Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

Richard MacCutchan1-Nov-09 21:19

1-Nov-09 21:19

Henry Minute wrote:
Lenovo

Age and brain fade prevented me from finding this name in my memory Cry | :((

USB 2.0 XP Driver Download

T210229-Nov-09 0:48

T2102

29-Nov-09 0:48

Google for online discount codes. I saved 20%+ on my Lenovo laptop doing that 2 years ago. As long as you don't care about "voiding the warranty", you should upgrade memory and the hard drive yourself. Many manufacturers charge 100+% of the new part price to upgrade a component that might be a 10 minute install.

loyal ginger29-Oct-09 6:50

loyal ginger

29-Oct-09 6:50

I lost track of the original driver discs for my machine. After I reloaded XP I only have USB 1.1. When went to Microsoft update site to update it to USB 2.0 (successfully). The Microsoft site did this by scanning my system and did the update automatically. There seems to have no way for me to install that driver manually.

I want to archive the USB 2.0 driver for XP on my machine, say save it to a CD. However, I don't know how I can download it from Microsoft site. Any ideas?

Thanks!

Jörgen Andersson29-Oct-09 7:34

29-Oct-09 7:34

USB2 drivers are included with WinXP Sp2. So there are basically no manufacturer that bothers with making special drivers for USB2.

loyal ginger29-Oct-09 17:27

loyal ginger

29-Oct-09 17:27

What I don't understand is I reinstalled XP, then put SP2 and SP3 on it. Both SP2 and SP3 were downloaded from microsoft.com. After that when I plugged a flash drive to the USB port I got the message:

This USB device can perform faster if you connect it to a Hi-Speed USB 2.0 port. For a list of available ports, click here.

This message appeared in a ballon box popped up from the system tray area.

After I put the update from Microsoft on, the message no longer appears. Why the SP2 that I installed does not contain the USB 2.0 driver?

Luc Pattyn29-Oct-09 17:39

Luc Pattyn

29-Oct-09 17:39

Just a hunch: maybe the updater told you you had to reboot the system and you didn't?

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn

I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages

Jörgen Andersson29-Oct-09 21:43

29-Oct-09 21:43

You don't need to install SP2 if you're going to install SP3. Microsoft servicepacks are incremental.
Other than that I really don't have an answer. Sorry.

dxlee30-Oct-09 5:04

dxlee

30-Oct-09 5:04

Regarding SP2 and SP3: I did install SP3 first, believing that it contains SP2. However, for some reason SP3 could not be successfully installed. The error message told me that SP2 had to be installed first (which is contrary to what I thought). That's why I installed SP2, then SP3.

I have USB2 working. I just wanted to save a copy of the driver so later if it happens again, I just need to pull out the archive to install the driver, instead of relying on a network connection and the availability of the driver somewhere in Microsoft's web site. Not a big deal. Thanks for your help.

Luc Pattyn30-Oct-09 5:36

Luc Pattyn

30-Oct-09 5:36

Jörgen Andersson wrote:
You don't need to

I would call that cumulative.
incremental to me means you have to do them in sequence.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn

I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages

Jörgen Andersson30-Oct-09 5:52

30-Oct-09 5:52

Of course, This is not my day, and coffee doesn't seem to help.