|
the problem with your query is if the years will be increased in the future. so instead of adding condition many times we need to summarize that. second
is
--Date----- weeknumber
2008-12-30--- 53
2009-01-02--- 54( this is wrong it should be 53, it falls in the 53rd week)
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Come on. it is correct. Because if you execute
select Datepart(wk,'12/30/2008') you will get the weeknumber as 53 and
select Datepart(wk,'1/2/2009') will yield 1.
As per your requirement, which you specified it should be 54. and henceforth the result.
For the first part(if the years will be increased in the future. so instead of adding condition many times we need to summarize that) we need to work on.
Niladri Biswas
|
|
|
|
|
sorry,I am wrong, the out should be 53 not 54. because 1/2/2009 falls in week 53. Is it possible to modify the query to meet my requirement...
The reply given by 'Mycroft Holmes' is working perfect but there is a small problem in that query, I posted the same in earlier thread.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide a sample output which should be correct enough. Otherwise it is becoming difficult for me to understand ur requirement.
Also u give a shot. As I told u that u can learn better if u try by urself.
Niladri Biswas
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Bugdate is the input and startweek, weeknumber are expected output.
when date is 2009-01-02 weeknumber should be 53 and when date is 2012-01-01 week number should be 210.
BugDate Startweek WeekNumber
----------------------------------------
2008-12-13 2008-12-07 50
2008-12-14 2008-12-14 51
2008-12-21 2008-12-21 52
2008-12-23 2008-12-21 52
2008-12-30 2008-12-28 53
2009-01-02 2008-12-28 53
2009-12-20 2009-12-20 104
2009-12-28 2009-12-27 105
2010-01-01 2009-12-27 105
2011-12-31 2011-12-25 209
2012-01-01 2012-01-01 210
2012-01-02 2012-01-01 210
2012-01-09 2012-01-08 211
|
|
|
|
|
Try this .
declare @tbl table(bugdate date)
insert into @tbl
select '12/13/2008' union all
select '12/14/2008' union all
select '12/21/2008' union all
select '12/23/2008' union all
select '12/30/2008' union all
select '1/2/2009' union all
select '1/6/2009' union all
select '12/20/2009' union all
select '12/28/2009' union all
select '1/1/2010'
select bugdate,
case when Datepart(yy,bugdate) = 2009 then Datepart(wk,bugdate) + 53*1
when Datepart(yy,bugdate) = 2010 then Datepart(wk,bugdate) + 53*2
else Datepart(wk,bugdate)
end as weeknumber
,DATEPART(dw,bugdate) weekdays
,DATENAME(dw, DATEPART(dw,bugdate)) weekdayname
,DATEadd(day, (1- DATEPART(dw,bugdate)), bugdate) AS startweek
,DATENAME(dw, DATEadd(day, (1- DATEPART(dw,bugdate)), bugdate)) startweekdayname
from @tbl
Output:
bugdate weeknumber weekdays weekdayname startweek startweekdayname
2008-12-13 50 7 Monday 2008-12-07 Sunday
2008-12-14 51 1 Tuesday 2008-12-14 Sunday
2008-12-21 52 1 Tuesday 2008-12-21 Sunday
2008-12-23 52 3 Thursday 2008-12-21 Sunday
2008-12-30 53 3 Thursday 2008-12-28 Sunday
2009-01-02 54 6 Sunday 2008-12-28 Sunday
2009-01-06 55 3 Thursday 2009-01-04 Sunday
2009-12-20 105 1 Tuesday 2009-12-20 Sunday
2009-12-28 106 2 Wednesday 2009-12-27 Sunday
2010-01-01 107 6 Sunday 2009-12-27 Sunday
Depending on ur requirement, accept the columns.
Note that I have multiplied 53 * 1 for 2009 & 53*2 for 2010. Now why 53?<br />
Because if you want to find out the last week of the last day of a year it will be 53. Try this Select Datepart(wk,'12/31/2008') or Select Datepart(wk,'12/31/2009') etc. The output will be 53. I am considering 2008(here) as my starting point and henceforth nothing to add with the weeks for this year. Since year 2009 is 1 ahead so I am multiplying 53 with 1(which is though of no use) and adding that to every week of that year(2009). The same rule apply for 2010 with the difference that 53 will be multiplied with 2. If we follow this rule then we can generalized a formula 53 * n where n=0,1....<br />
Note- Follow what Mr.Mycroft said. It is better for ur learning.
Niladri Biswas
modified on Friday, October 30, 2009 5:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
how to apply this in a simple way
|
|
|
|
|
Click apply?
Wout Louwers
|
|
|
|
|
 What do you mean?
It's not necessary to be so stupid, either, but people manage it. - Christian Graus, 2009 AD
|
|
|
|
|
Rockery - how to apply this without sweating. You're question makes as much sense.
I suggest you do some research, possibly get a minimal understanding (a little more than this question implies) of the subject.
Get hold of SQL Express, make sure you do not have 2005 on your machine and try to install it. Or even get Access from Office professional and play with that.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
There are many ways to do this. For smaller projects you can use SQLite which is free. You can also use Microsoft Access. They are both good for single user use. If you need a server, then you can try MySQL (also free). If you have the money, you can buy a SQL Server (from Microsoft) or Oracle. There are a few other free database servers available.
You probably need to write some programs to interact with the database. SQL is also a good thing to learn, although some people can get by without knowing SQL. I personally know a few who depend on the GUI of Access to do query stuff. You can write programs using VB.NET, C#, C++, or many other languages (such as Perl and PHP).
Hope this answers your question.
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUID NITROGEN
The woods are lovely, dark, and deep
But I have promises to keep
and lines to code before I sleep,
and lines to code before I sleep...
|
|
|
|
|
To quote from the site[^];
SQL Server 2005 Express for Beginners: This video series is designed specifically for SQL Server beginners-individuals who are interested in learning the basics of how to create, manage, and connect to SQL Server Express databases.
There are more short tutorials available on the web, and you can always come back here if you get stuck
I are Troll 
|
|
|
|
|
Having successfully installed SQL Server 2008 Express on the server, I found no way to connect to it from the client. "Connection refused" was the message, despite being an Administrator on both machines, and having all protocols enabled. Since I have the Management Studio for SSEx2005 installed on the client, I thought there might be a problem trying to connect because of the version difference. I tried installing the latest 2008 version on the client. No joy there - it won't install if 2005 is present, and the installer advised me to uninstall the older version first.
I did so, then re-ran the installer. Again, failure. The Performance Counters are corrupted - see this article; blah, blah. I checked the article, and it was indeed informative! But the message at the top of the page told me that this procedure doesn't apply to my OS (WinXPSP2). It referred me to the WinXP support page, which contains no equivalent article. That's not a bit surprising from my 15 years experience with Microsoft support.
Since the Web Platform Installer keeps a running account of installation attempts, and subsequent tries resulted in instantaneous failure notices, I decided to wipe the slate clean, hunted down and deleted the log files, and tried again. Another failure, this time because I "have to install SP3 for this product" or some such message. The system requirements page lists SP2 as the highest required for the package.
I've now spent 30 - 40 hours trying to install a product that is intended to lure beginners into buying the whole hog, presumably because it is so easy and useful to use. In the process I've now damaged VS2008 (which installed the 2005 version in the first place) on a virgin XP machine with no customizations - I just allowed the MS defaults when I installed the OS on a clean PC.
All I want to do is create a simple program to track inventory items and the maintenance records for them. But it's become a career just to install the tools to do so. I thought it would be nice to use the latest version of SQL Server to implement the program, but it's looking like that was a big mistake. Now my VS2008 is crippled, with no DB installed, and I have a perfectly functional, but unreachable DB engine running on the server.
By the way, the client has tons of RAM, but very little drive space and no way to improve that situation. The server has a bunch of drive space, but limited RAM, and VS2008 doesn't seem to like Windows Server 2003 very much. That's the reason for the current configuration.
Can anyone suggest a reasonable way out of this dilemma?
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
Hello i want to write a where clause that will allow me to separate a table according to different column value. I do not know the values of the column because they are dynamic. I want something else than using a cursor.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a little Google[^]mojo
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I would have replied in a bitter way but the way you gave me the result it was so funny that i took the link  thanks , btw i searched but i did not use the same words u did
|
|
|
|
|
That's why it is called mojo, comes from experience and having been down that path before. Good on you for taking the info and getting some value out of it, a lesser person would not have got past the implied insult.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Can I get back to you in a couple of days on the topic?
I are Troll
|
|
|
|
|
Create PROCEDURE [dbo].[WidgetServer_GetAllShopList_FR]
(
@CatalogID nvarchar(max),
@PageSize INT,
@PageIndex INT,
@NoOfPages INT OUTPUT
)
AS
DECLARE @StartRowIndex INT
DECLARE @Delimiter CHAR
DECLARE @iIndex SMALLINT
DECLARE @iCatalogId INT
DECLARE @iNoofPages INT
-- DECLARE @CatalogID nvarchar(max)
--DECLARE @PageSize INT
--DECLARE @PageIndex INT
--DECLARE @NoOfPages INT
-- SET @CatalogID='1,2,3';
-- SET @PageIndex = 1;
-- Set @PageSize = 5;
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SET @StartRowIndex= ((@PageIndex * @PageSize) + 1);
BEGIN
SET @Delimiter = ','
WHILE @CatalogID <> ''
BEGIN
SET @iIndex = CHARINDEX(@Delimiter, @CatalogID)
IF @iIndex > 0
BEGIN
SET @iCatalogId = LEFT(@CatalogID, @iIndex-1)
SET @CatalogID = RIGHT(@CatalogID, LEN(@CatalogID) - @iIndex)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SET @iCatalogId = @CatalogID
SET @CatalogID = ''
END
BEGIN
SET @iNoofPages = (SELECT ISNULL((SELECT ((COUNT(*) / @Pagesize) + CASE WHEN (COUNT(*) % @Pagesize) > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
FROM dbo.Shops INNER JOIN Folder ON Folder.ShopID = Shops.ShopID
INNER JOIN [Catalog] ON Catalog.CatalogID = Folder.CatalogID
WHERE Catalog.CatalogID = (@iCatalogId) AND dbo.Shops.[Status] = 1),0));
END
SELECT Distinct Shops.ShopName_FR as ShopName, Shops.ShopID,Catalog.CatalogID, Catalog.CatalogName_FR as CatalogName, Folder.FolderName_FR as Folder
FROM Catalog INNER JOIN
Folder ON Catalog.CatalogID = Folder.CatalogID INNER JOIN
Shops ON Folder.ShopID = Shops.ShopID Where Catalog.CatalogID = (@iCatalogId)
END
END
In this while looping first we will get NoofPages=4 and then 2
I need to add those to values and get in NoofPages
Can any one tell me how?
Yamuna
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE use
tags when posting your code.
Are you trying to get the sum of noofpages?
<pre>
Declare
@Var INT
Select @Var = SUM(case statement)
From ....
Print '@Var ' + Convert(varchar(1000),@Var)
|
|
|
|
|
hi
Thanks for your reply
how can we get the NoofPages count here thru when case?
explain in detail.
regards,
Yamuna
|
|
|
|
|
yamunarani wrote: explain in detail.
The new snd codz plz
Sorry if you cannot work it out then I can't help you.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All
How can i install and configure mssql database server for netwoek?I have a network and all machine is member of domain.How can i make connection through client with server?In the client side i have Xp OS and Server Side XP server 2003.
Plz help me
|
|
|
|
|
Open Surface Area configuration for your server and enable remote connections then clients will be able to connect to it through a valid username and password.
It's not necessary to be so stupid, either, but people manage it. - Christian Graus, 2009 AD
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
