|
Hi,
try 'Remotesoft Protector' or 'MaxtoCode'
modified 27-May-14 5:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
My computer is affected by a virus 'regsvr.exe' which slows down the machine by eating proccessors time. I have to explicitly kill it from the process tab in the task manager.
For this reason i want to create a executiable that would kill its process. Also specify how to put my executiable in the startup menu.
|
|
|
|
|
Why not just clean the virus off your machine?  and remember to practice safe computing in the future.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Ishaan Karnik wrote: For this reason i want to create a executiable that would kill its process. Also specify how to put my executiable in the startup menu
I would rather use a anti virus to do this.
Manas Bhardwaj
Please remember to rate helpful or unhelpful answers, it lets us and people reading the forums know if our answers are any good.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use this:
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("tskill", "regsvr");<
But it much beter to use anti-virus to remove the virus or any other viruses.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a anti-virus software installed currently and the virus is not letting the anti-virus software install one.
|
|
|
|
|
Well this will do the job then:
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("tskill", "regsvr");
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
// you can kill process by PID
Process p= Process.GetProcessById(PID);
p.Kill();
modified 27-May-14 5:33am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
i am creating a Window based application having a button publish
a document is prepared containing Text,graphics audio Vedio. When a publish button is clicked the selected document is connerted into its Web Equivelent form
i do not have any idea about this how can i achive it
give me some Sugestion and steps to achive it
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a homework assignment or a work task? In either case we are not here to do your work for you. Try something, then ask questions about what you don't understand.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
santosh_anu wrote: i do not have any idea about this how can i achive it
your options are,
1 - think it over, and try to it yourself
2 - hire someone to do it for you.
You can't just tell us what you want and sit back while we write it for you
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
sorry to annoy you Christian Graus and Mark Nischalke
you took me wrong
actually im absolutely new user of .net ,don't have much experiance about its all advance features
i just wanted guidelines not the exact code .
i made a rough layout to achive this is generate a Xml equivelent file at bckend Which store all information about The Window form as the operation perform With form
but i have no idea Where to Write Xml Parsing file
|
|
|
|
|
Im not so clear about your description
try this:
first, copy what you selected to Clipboard.
second, paste it to web equivelent form.
Hope it's helpful
modified 27-May-14 5:33am.
|
|
|
|
|
hello
the publish button code i Want to include in my project i have an idea for that i want to use
1. generate the xml eqivelent form of Windows form (For Xml parsing)
after that i tranform this xml code to its Web eqivelent code
but how can i generate Xml equivelent code for each form
|
|
|
|
|
i try to use xml parsing for the code to publish butto
but do not have much idea about it
so if you links releated to this topic or any good book for xml parsing then sugest me the name
|
|
|
|
|
Hey All,
I know this is the C# forum, but there isn't a Crystal forum.
I am building a very simple report in a table format but i need the details section to repeat (even with empty data) to the end of the page.
For example;
If only 3 records are returned from the database I need empty rows to fill the rest of the page until the page / report footer.
I have tried setting the "Print at bottom of page" on the report footer, but all it does is stretch the last details section to the bottom of the page (not repeating but stretching) so the whole table look goes out the window and I'm left with an ugly report.
Any help or input will be greatly appreciated.
Oh yeah, I'm using the report designer in Visual Studio 2008 so I think it's Crystal X but all it says in about is "Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2008" so i could be wrong.
If at first you don't succeed ... post it on The Code Project and Pray.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
Could you please guide me , how I can access to this item[^] text in a ListView ?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Listview.Items[RowIndex].SubItems[ColIndex]
It's not necessary to be so stupid, either, but people manage it. - Christian Graus, 2009 AD
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs2005 .net v2
Hi I have a number of windows client applications which use web services to send and receive data.
When a client starts it could be active for 5 minutes or 5 hours..
When the client first loads it instanciates a web service and calls its methods the client could make hundreds of calls to various web service methods.
- this instanciation remains until the user logs out of the client.
So the client instanciates the web service only once - is this the correct way or should I be instanciating the web service before every method call then clearing up? - and would there be a substancial performance hit this way?
The problem im getting is that the web service occasionally hangs (for all clients) and I have to recycle the app pool to get it running again.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, reusing the item seems to make sense to me, so long as it doesn't leak memory. Does it always take a long time to hang ? Perhaps it is leaking resources ?
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
In my opinion:
1） a client instanciatees a 'web service's proxy class' object only once.
2) once the client connect the web serivce( calls a method), it will instanciate a 'socket' object(or 'networkstream' object, to send 'cmd' and get the result from the web serivce), and when get the result datas, the 'socket' will be cleared up by framework2.0.
3) so 'web service's proxy' object is once, 'socket' objects are several times, when a method called.
modified 27-May-14 5:33am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working in an application wich works with more than 100 threads belonging to ThreadPool in a common job, so I create the WaitCallback object pointing to a method, next from the Main Thread with a For sentence I start creating Threads, and I see:
1) if all the execution procedure is self-contained in the method called with the WaitCallBack object, ever thread start working from it´s creation an everything works correctly.
2) but if for finish the job the pointed method needs to use any other method outside itself, now the Main Thread takes the complete execution time and no other Thread start working until the Main Thread finish creating all the Threads.
So I don`t know how to avoid using Class or methods externals to the method pointed by the WaitCallback object. And the big quantity of created Threads, without discarging one until the end of creation process in the Main Thread, makes the system blocked before finishing.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I did not understand half of what you said, however the other half leads to these remarks:
1.
The ThreadPool holds a (rather large) number of threads, depending on the Windows version. You can modify it with ThreadPool.SetMaxThreads, which I do not recommend!
2.
"with a For sentence I start creating Threads" sounds horrible; if a number of threads need to execute the same kind of work (which isn't mostly waiting for something), then you should limit the number of those threads to some small number, say 4. Having more than a few threads trying to do similar work will only slow down the overall system, since your app will run into some common bottleneck right away (bus bandwidth, disk I/O, network I/O, cache trashing, or any combination thereof).
3.
Any multithreaded system will malfunction if you have incorrect synchronization; you would need locks to prevent accessing stale data, and too many locks may bring everything to a halt.
Luc Pattyn
Have a look at my entry for the lean-and-mean competition; please provide comments, feedback, discussion, and don’t forget to vote for it! Thank you.
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that a lot of Threads can easily block the system, so I am using a ThreadPool in order to recovery each thread after finishing their job, but I follow studyng my problem and I see that I´m using method`s and control`s created in a different Thread (using checkforilegalcrossthreads = false) and I believe that it is not a good idea, I am stsrting with Threads and I don´t understand completely the threads rules and way of programming with them.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
