ASP.NET

Re: Displaying currentuser emailId in the Masterpage

3-Aug-09 22:46

Abhijit Jana wrote:
Store Email ID in Session Variable

how much memory can be used from session memory ?
will this reduce the performance, if the number of online users is very high ??

Apurv

“Never trust a computer you can’t throw out a window.”
(Steve Wozniak)

“There are only two industries that refer to their customers as ‘users’.”
(Edward Tufte)

Christian Graus3-Aug-09 22:49

Re: Displaying currentuser emailId in the Masterpage

3-Aug-09 22:49

Think about this for a moment. How big is the data you want to store. How long can an email address be ? How many users do you expect to have ? Are you running it on a Commodore 64 ?

Session data should be used sparingly, but storing some email addresses is not going to crash it. It's more when people fill the session with data sets, etc, and never empty it, that it can cause issues. You need to at least store something in the session to note the user that is logged in. If you store their user id, you can elect to read any other data from the DB, although this is surely going to 'cost' more to retrieve an email address every time, than if you store it in the session

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

Apr^Ngp3-Aug-09 22:52

Re: Displaying currentuser emailId in the Masterpage

3-Aug-09 22:52

Thank you very much ....
I got the point ....

Apurv

“Never trust a computer you can’t throw out a window.”
(Steve Wozniak)

“There are only two industries that refer to their customers as ‘users’.”
(Edward Tufte)

Abhijit Jana3-Aug-09 23:02

Abhijit Jana

3-Aug-09 23:02

apr~asp wrote:
how much memory can be used from session memory ?
will this reduce the performance, if the number of online users is very high ??

No, Storing User ID, Email ID does not reduce the permanence at all. You have to rethink your design when you want to store DataTable, DataSet in Session, It can cause performance issue.

Abhijit Jana | Codeproject MVP
Web Site : abhijitjana.net
Don't forget to click "Good Answer" on the post(s) that helped you.
View My Latest Article

How to make the tree node visible or hidden in treeview?

meeram3953-Aug-09 21:49

meeram395

3-Aug-09 21:49

I want to make the treenodes visible or hidden based on some conditions.If the condition is true, hide the node, else visible.

I don't want to use WPF or any other libraries. Can it be possible with a few code lines. Even though I googled for sometime, it seems that it is possible only with WPF. Can anybody please provide any help on this? I have the following lines of code:

if (!htuserSecurityGroups.ContainsKey(securityGroup.Id))
            {
                node.SelectAction = TreeNodeSelectAction.None;
                
            }

htuserSecurityGroups is the hashtable object and securityGroup is the collection object. This will only disable the selection. I want to make invisible the node itself? Is it possible? Please help. Thanks in advance.

Success is the good fortune that comes from aspiration, desperation, perspiration and inspiration.

functions

rajni_nanu3-Aug-09 21:37

rajni_nanu

3-Aug-09 21:37

why do we make our own functions in dotnet

Abhijit Jana3-Aug-09 22:07

Abhijit Jana

3-Aug-09 22:07

rajni_nanu wrote:
why do we make our own functions in dotnet

This is not only about DotNet.
Please Read this
Functional programming[^]

Abhijit Jana | Codeproject MVP
Web Site : abhijitjana.net
Don't forget to click "Good Answer" on the post(s) that helped you.
View My Latest Article

N a v a n e e t h3-Aug-09 22:15

N a v a n e e t h

3-Aug-09 22:15

rajni_nanu wrote:
why do we make our own functions in dotnet

Microsoft is so stupid and they can't ship all the function that we need with .NET. So we end up with writing our own functions.

Smile | :)

Navaneeth

How to use google | Ask smart questions

Blue_Boy3-Aug-09 22:20

Blue_Boy

3-Aug-09 22:20

Just because to make ourself more easy programming way.

I Love T-SQL
"Don't torture yourself,let the life to do it for you."
If my post helps you kindly save my time by voting my post.

www.aktualiteti.com

Christian Graus3-Aug-09 22:36

3-Aug-09 22:36

Why is this forum flooded with morons at this time, every day ?

This question has nothing to do with ASP.NET, and has no real answer, apart from, buy a book and read it before you start asking questions. It's obvious you have no idea about even the rudiments of programming. On what basis could we hope to give you an answer you could understand ?

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

Runtime Error On Server

mdazeemuddin3-Aug-09 21:16

mdazeemuddin

3-Aug-09 21:16

Hi Every body,

By the Grace of God i create my first Website and i published on Net and i create Database also

My Question is it is necessary to have customError tag in web.config because when i type my website URL i got is error that customErrors mode="Off" and one more thing in web.congif only i write the Configuration setting like this

<configuration>
<appSettings>
<add key ="Connect" value="server=.; database=Ckom; uid=sa; Password=;" />
</appSettings>
<connectionStrings/>

in server i change the database name, userid,password and server="localhost" i don't know wether this is right or wrong i am very much confuse with server

please help me so that i can see my website

again i will that i got the message

Server Error in '/' Application.

below this they show customError mode="off"

please help me by telling excat what are the changes i have to made in web.config file on the server

SeMartens3-Aug-09 21:24

SeMartens

3-Aug-09 21:24

Hi,

is your database located at the the same sever as the ASP.NET application. If yes, localhost for your server is right, if not you have to change this.

Best approach for the error-issue would be to use a custom error page that will be displayed whenever an error occurs. Best would be to change the mode to "remoteOnly". Then connect to your server via RDP to get a detailed information about the error (exception type, stack trace etc.)

Regards
Sebastian

It's not a bug, it's a feature!

Check out my CodeProject article Permission-by-aspect.

Me in Softwareland.

mdazeemuddin3-Aug-09 21:32

mdazeemuddin

3-Aug-09 21:32

Thanks For Your support

Can You give correct syntax of CustomError what i have to write on web.config file

thanks again

SeMartens3-Aug-09 21:36

SeMartens

3-Aug-09 21:36

Have a look here:

http://aspnetresources.com/articles/CustomErrorPages.aspx[^]

It's not a bug, it's a feature!

Check out my CodeProject article Permission-by-aspect.

Me in Softwareland.

Christian Graus3-Aug-09 21:24

3-Aug-09 21:24

The error you're seeing, is telling you that you can't see the real error, because of the web.config settings. So you need to insert the code it's telling you to insert, which will allow error messages to be shown to a remote client. You'll then get an error telling you the actual problem with your site.

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

Apr^Ngp3-Aug-09 22:49

3-Aug-09 22:49

Error handling can be done on Page Level, by overriding the onerror() function.
Can this be done only on master page ?
I mean, can we add an error handler on master page, rather than adding it on every single page ... ???

Apurv

“Never trust a computer you can’t throw out a window.”
(Steve Wozniak)

“There are only two industries that refer to their customers as ‘users’.”
(Edward Tufte)

Christian Graus3-Aug-09 22:51

3-Aug-09 22:51

I am not sure that this is true. But, you can handle errors at the top level in the same place that the application start and session start events are handled.

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

Apr^Ngp3-Aug-09 22:56