|
15 second files? That sounds smart, but how would i accomplish this? Put one media player onto of another? I have absolutley no clue.
|
|
|
|
|
AKC_pico wrote: I have absolutley no clue.
Correct.
Breaking up the files requires some media software, I can't help with that.
You only need one player and that is used to play one file after another.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, what is your question ? I can see no correlation between your header ( which is about fonts ) and your question ( which is about how to create a bitmap button, from what I can tell, although you sure seem to be doing it badly, and could have just found a class to use on this site )
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
i mean i want do a button it can load background image
and change the text's Font of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am trying to send HTML formatted Email.
I am able to send as per my format. But when I am testing on Office 2007, there is no space coming and table format is not coming.
I have searched out and find that Outlook 2007 is no more supporting HTML tags.
Kindly let me know. How to achieve this.
Thanks,
Sun Rays
To get something you must have to try once.
Rate answers if you like else reply me so can make it liked....
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
Sun Rays wrote: I have searched out and find that Outlook 2007 is no more supporting HTML tags.
In which case, you can't send HTML mail, right ?
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah,
I am not able to use table tag and there is no space is coming when using br tag as well.
Thanks,
Sun Rays
To get something you must have to try once.
Rate answers if you like else reply me so can make it liked....
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, you need to not send HTML mail if you want it to work in outlook, right ?
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a default.aspx inheriting a site.master. I placed a login usercontrol inside the default.aspx like so:
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="ctrlLogin" Src="ctrlLogin.ascx" %>
<asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="MainContent" Runat="Server">
<uc:ctrlLogin id="controlLogin" runat="server"></uc:ctrlLogin>
</asp:Content>
To reference functions in the globalLogin, the login usercontrol ctrlLogin.ascx.cs has:
globalLogin login = (globalLogin)this.NamingContainer;
login.whatever()
This generates the error:
System.InvalidCastException: Unable to cast object of type 'System.Web.UI.WebControls.ContentPlaceHolder' to type 'ProjectName.globalLogin'.
Can anybody help me out and let me know what I am doing wrong? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Am creating a page that uses anthem control on .NET, and every thing works fine until i need a popup page to appear i click on the button but nothing happens i right click on it then click open the pop up appears.
I think the issue that the whole page needs to go to server to open this page because when i right click the bar status at the bottom of the Browser appears. I replace the anthem control with asp one same problem could any one help me.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what you're asking, but suspect it's about a third party library ( so, ask them ) and to do with ASP.NET ( so, ask in the ASP.NET forum if you ask here )
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
The question below got me thinking.
Is there a reason why ToString() has been implemented in .Net as a method and not a property?
More importantly, is there a good reason"
___________________________________________
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
The ToString method is generally considered as a framework-wide helper to convert objects to their string representations. The keyword in that sentence is, again, convert; conversions generally take place in methods, not getters. Properties are meant for attributes of an object, not their representations in other types.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't think of any. A public virtual get-only property ToString would compile to public virtual get_ToString(), the name is the only thing that's actually different from the way it is now.
So I think it's about more religious things such as "properties should not throw exceptions" and "properties should not do a lot of work"
|
|
|
|
|
Another reason could be that ToString() can be overloaded with additional parameters. For example, it is overloaded for double, where you can pass in a format string.
ToString as the name of a property also doesn't make sense, because it indicates an action. As a property, it should have been called String or something, which may be confusing.
I guess it's also something inherited from Java, where it is called toString().
|
|
|
|
|
Martijn Boeker wrote: I guess it's also something inherited from Java, where it is called toString().
Not quite. Java don't do no stinking properties! It has variables and methods. The closest thing to a property I can think of is length on an array.
Martijn Boeker wrote: Another reason could be that ToString() can be overloaded with additional parameters. For example, it is overloaded for double, where you can pass in a format string.
This is the correctest answer  ! The two arguments are that any action must be a method and nothing should be changed by a getter.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: correctest
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get.
Show formatted code inside PRE tags, and give clear symptoms when describing a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Good isn't it!
For a real brain weep, on the radio this morning someone said '...more better...'
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Java don't do no stinking properties!
How is this relevant? It just seems that C# copied the toString() method from Java and they somehow decided to leave it as a method.
Nagy Vilmos wrote: nothing should be changed by a getter
ToString() normally does not change the state of the object.
Anyway, this is not even an argument because a property getter can change the state of an object. For example, the property can be lazy loaded, like a property getter that is mapped in NHibernate.
Nagy Vilmos wrote: any action must be a method
The action is "Get a string representation of this object". This 'action' sounds like it could be represented by either a property getter or a method, it doesn't really matter.
In general, you cannot judge if something should be a property by the amount of work it does or if it changes the state of an object. A property is part of the class interface and does not reveal any information about how it is implemented. I suppose the only rule is that if you set a property to a certain value, you expect to get the same value back when you call the property getter.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, a type may define overloads of ToString that require parameters (see int for example), properties can't be overloaded.
|
|
|
|
|
On the following sample code I get the error:
Operator `+' cannot be applied to operands of type `string' and `method group'(CS0019)]
protected virtual void OnButton7Clicked (object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
string str1 = ("This is number " + x.ToString);
label1.Text = str1;
x+=1;
}
Any feedback would be appreciated. I am a VB.Net Programmer mowing to C#
|
|
|
|
|
tsqlmand wrote: string str1 = ("This is number " + x.ToString());
You missed out those brackets.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you both. I had some evening blindness I Guess.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
