ASP.NET

Re: Getting this exception : This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode

5-Mar-09 12:34

on your xp desktop, try the following:
1. Disable IE show friendly error messages from the advanced page
2. Open IE and type the following http:\\localhost\

this should redirect you to http://localhost/localstart.asp. If you see the page ok, then asp is running on your xp, if not what error message do you see. that should give you some clue.

If you see http:\\localhost ok, then make sure your asp program is installed properly in your xp machine. make sure any COM objects it uses are configured and registered properly.

Yusuf

jitu gupta5-Mar-09 12:54

jitu gupta

5-Mar-09 12:54

HI,
i am created one test solution for checking purpose whether asp is working or not . I am getting this error in test application

Server Error in '/WebSite1' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This type of page is not served.
Description: The type of page you have requested is not served because it has been explicitly forbidden. The extension '.asp' may be incorrect. Please review the URL below and make sure that it is spelled correctly.

Requested URL: /WebSite1/Default2.asp

Re: Getting this exception : This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode

JMummery5-Mar-09 12:57

JMummery

5-Mar-09 12:57

This may help:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/815152[^]

Regards
Julian Mummery

Please Visit my FREE Bug / Fault Logging Website at FaultLogger.com

Re: Getting this exception : This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode

Yusuf5-Mar-09 13:09

Re: Getting this exception : This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode

5-Mar-09 13:09

then you need to configure IIS to serve asp pages see here for details[^]

Make sure 'Active Server Pages' are allowed, see the picture.

Yusuf

jitu gupta5-Mar-09 13:32

jitu gupta

5-Mar-09 13:32

Yusuf,
Actually my IIS dont have these option "Application pools" and "Service web extentions" .
please see your link which you sent me.

what i need to do ...

Re: Getting this exception : This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode

Yusuf5-Mar-09 13:45

Re: Getting this exception : This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode

5-Mar-09 13:45

read the whole article. There is more than the picture in it. There are plenty of other resources on that page.

Yusuf

Expert Coming5-Mar-09 14:14

Expert Coming

5-Mar-09 14:14

Yusuf wrote:
There is more than the picture in it.

Lol, beautiful!

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

Calling a javascript authenticate function when a ASP Login control fires the onauthenticate event. [modified]

Steve Holdorf5-Mar-09 9:23

Steve Holdorf

5-Mar-09 9:23

I have an ASP Login control contained in a UpdatePanel. What I need to do is call a javascript function when the Login control's onauthenticate event is fired. I tried adding the following to the Login control definition:

onauthenticate="authenticate(this, e)"

The problem is that when I try to run the application I receive an error that argument e is undefined in the current context. How can I do this?

Thanks,

Steve

modified on Thursday, March 5, 2009 5:29 PM

Re: Calling a javascript authenticate function when a ASP Login control fires the onauthenticate event.

Christian Graus5-Mar-09 9:24

Christian Graus

5-Mar-09 9:24

Define 'e'.

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Re: Calling a javascript authenticate function when a ASP Login control fires the onauthenticate event.

Steve Holdorf6-Mar-09 7:19

Steve Holdorf

6-Mar-09 7:19

I was not quite sure what you were suggesting when you replied for me to define e. I think that my initial question was not worded correctly. I just wanted to know if anyone know what the parameter for the ASP Login control onauthenticate="authenticate(this, ?)" would be if authenticate was a javascript function? I know that code behind event args are of type AuthenticateEventArgs but how would this be indicated in the javascript Login control onauthenticate definition?

Thanks,

Steve

Web.Config and debugging

J$5-Mar-09 8:45

5-Mar-09 8:45

I have created a web service, and a coworker has created an installation package for it using InstallShield.

I have just realized that I forgot to change the Web.config file to set debug to false before he made the installation package. It is currently set to

compilation defaultLanguage="c#" debug="true"/

My question is, if I manually edit the Web.config file for this web service to set it to the following value after it has already been deployed, will it still execute with all the debugging overhead and resources?

compilation defaultLanguage="c#" debug="false"/

Do I have to bother my coworker to put another build together after I change the Web.config file?

Thanks for your time.

Re: Web.Config and debugging

Christian Graus5-Mar-09 8:56

Christian Graus

5-Mar-09 8:56

No, the point of config files is that you can deploy an exe and change things about it, by just changing the config file. The exe reads the config files.

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Re: Web.Config and debugging

J$5-Mar-09 8:58

5-Mar-09 8:58

Thanks for the quick response.

How to read value of textbox from gridview

vilas_kwagh5-Mar-09 6:19

vilas_kwagh

5-Mar-09 6:19

I have use following code for reading value of textbox from gridview,but it could not give any value.it just show null value....Pls Help Me...

protected void GridView1_RowDataBound(object sender, GridViewRowEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.DataRow)
{
Button l = (Button)e.Row.FindControl("Button1");
if (l != null)
{
TextBox t = (TextBox)e.Row.FindControl("txt_choose");

string vc = t.Text;
}
}
}

Re: How to read value of textbox from gridview

Christian Graus5-Mar-09 8:23

Christian Graus

5-Mar-09 8:23

I guess you need to tell us which line fails and show us the ASPX as well.

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Need help on displaying selected record(s) in a datagrid without re-querying a table

Sath Garcia5-Mar-09 6:08

Sath Garcia

5-Mar-09 6:08

hello,

I have a department and an employee table. I populated a radio button list with all the department codes.

By default a Gridview will display all employee record. And, when I will select one department code on the radio button list, the GridView will only display employee record(s) with the same department code(s).

This is working fine with the ff:

protected void radioButtonList1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SqlDataSource2.SelectParameters.Add("deptCode", radioButtonList1.SelectedValue);
SqlDataSource2.SelectCommand = "SELECT [iD], [firstName], [lastName], [dateOfBirth], [deptCode][position] FROM [F201] WHERE ([deptCode] = @deptCode)";
}

But, I think that, when there will be to many employee records, this will slow the loading. Is there any other way to display these record to a Gridview without re-querying to the table?

I am new to Asp.Net, any suggestion will be very much appreciated.

Re: Need help on displaying selected record(s) in a datagrid without re-querying a table

Yusuf5-Mar-09 8:14

Re: Need help on displaying selected record(s) in a datagrid without re-querying a table

5-Mar-09 8:14

How many is too many?

Is your Gridview paginated? that could help in loading time. You could write sql stored procedure to help with the database performance too.

Sath Garcia wrote:
display these record to a Gridview without re-querying to the table?

The only way is to load all the records and write javascript code to manupliate your gridview. But don't think this is going to be easy code.

Yusuf

Sath Garcia5-Mar-09 20:06

Sath Garcia

5-Mar-09 20:06

Thanks man,

Yes the gridview is paged. I set it to 20. Anyway, I guess I am gonna be sticking to what i did for the main time, besides, it is not really that "many" records. I was just looking for any other alternatives to further speed up the apps

I guess I'll start digging for javascripts too

thanks again.

.NET 3.5 and 2.0 Question

Vimalsoft(Pty) Ltd5-Mar-09 3:56

5-Mar-09 3:56

Good Day All

My Employer is using .NET 2.0 and we have VS 2008 installed. In a Way he is Saying am giving you latest tools to give me a solution. Now we have big long runing .NET 2.0 Project, and as Developer we need to grow in the product by exploring the technologies presented in 3.5.So my question is is it Posible to Add a .NET 3.5 technology on 2.0 ? and how ?

Thank you

Vuyiswa Maseko,

Few companies that installed computers to reduce the employment of clerks have realized their expectations.... They now need more and more expensive clerks even though they call them "Developers" or "Programmers."

C#/VB.NET/ASP.NET/SQL7/2000/2005/2008
http://www.vuyiswamaseko.tiyaneProperties.co.za
vuyiswa@its.co.za
www.ITS.co.za

Xmen Real 5-Mar-09 4:15

Xmen Real

5-Mar-09 4:15

simple answer...no. Best thing is install 3.5. Its free.

TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can

Vimalsoft(Pty) Ltd5-Mar-09 19:09

5-Mar-09 19:09

You really did not take time to understand my question

JMummery5-Mar-09 11:06

JMummery

5-Mar-09 11:06

.NET 3.5 is just an extentension of the other versions with some extra controls and mainly the addition of bult in AJAX.

Make sure that 3.5 is installed and then open your 2.0 project in VS 2008. The 3.5 functonality should be available to use.

See this for addtional details on how to use:

http://blogs.msdn.com/vijaysk/archive/2008/03/20/running-asp-net-3-5-on-iis.aspx[^]

Regards
Julian Mummery

Please Visit my FREE Bug / Fault Logging Website at FaultLogger.com

Vimalsoft(Pty) Ltd5-Mar-09 19:06

5-Mar-09 19:06

hi JMummery

Thank you for your advice. Thats cool

Thank you

server time...

scar_face5-Mar-09 2:49

scar_face

5-Mar-09 2:49

can anyone tel the code for servertime..will .ToLocalTime get the server time..

scarface

Re: server time...

Vimalsoft(Pty) Ltd5-Mar-09 3:18