|
You need to wire up the javascript call on the server side. You will only really be able to get the client ID on the server, where all that information is readily available. Something like the following:
void Page_Load(...)
{
chkMyCheckBox.Attributes.Add("onclick", "jsVerify('" + chkMyCheckBox.ClientID + "')");
}
|
|
|
|
|
hii,i have a slideShowExtender control in my project i want to get the images in the slideShowExtender as soon as i click the folder(which is in my local) plzz help me out
|
|
|
|
|
could somebody explain to me why on earth you would use a listview control (or almost any other asp:xxx control) on a web page?? i looked at using it just now and am frankly astounded at how much garbage there is just to draw a table on a page??? what on earth does it do that i'm not seeing??
genuinely could somebody please explain?
thnx
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
|
|
|
|
|
Basically you may use ASP controls to render content dynamically.
In a few simple words, suppose you want to render a table with data from a DB. You cannot use a static HTML table with X rows, because you don't know how many rows you have in DB to display.
Simple options here are: to use <asp:table xmlns:asp="#unknown"> control, which can be dynamically rendered, you may add rows, columns, etc..using code behind(C#, VB), or, second option, to render HTML tags dynamically, but in this case you don't have managed support (let's say for each row from DB you'll add a < tr > tag).
Calin
|
|
|
|
|
ok i get that ... let me point out that i have been writing (and teaching) db driven websites for 6+yrs in python and php so i know exactly how to render dynamic content to html or xhtml
my question was meant to be more like ... what does the asp:listview give me (apart from a whole bunch of overhead) that rendering clean html directly doesn't?
thnx
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
|
|
|
|
|
ok, then.
It gives you a lot of features like: dynamic rendering, binding, custom templates, insert/edit/update modes, integrated pagination, integrated sorting...
Calin
|
|
|
|
|
but with a huge overhead and complexity that depends on a 3rd party (in this case MS) getting it all working correctly and rendering properly
when it's very easy to do all those things without all the extra layers and overhead
that was why i was wondering what asp:xxx controls bring to the party and who they are aimed at?
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
|
|
|
|
|
I think you might get on better with the ASP.NET MVC framework - It's a lot cleaner.
|
|
|
|
|
ahhhhh cool ... i'll take a look at that
thnx
[edit]
wow that looks cool ... url rewriting is built in
[/edit]
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
modified on Saturday, February 28, 2009 7:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Oops I accidentally clicked on "bad question".  sorry!
//I couldn't revoke. but made it a good question.
OK,. what country just started work for the day ? The ASP.NET forum is flooded with retarded questions. -Christian Graus
Best wishes to Rexx[^]
|
|
|
|
|
WinForms controls are designed for people who don't know, and don't want to know, anything about HTML. The same people who managed to write Windows apps for years without ever knowing anything about Win32. They are, IMHO, worse than useless if you actually need or want some control over what's actually sent to the client.
As Colin suggests, you'll probably be much happier with the MVC stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
coming from you that answers all i need to know
thnx
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
|
|
|
|
|
HI
I Have scenario in which there are two websites configures in IIS 6 i have redirected the Website A to Website B in IIS, how can i track that user has enter the URL of Website A and redirected to Website B ?, kindly reply ASAP, thanks in Advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Try this: Request.ServerVariables("HTTP_Referer")
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your answer but it return null to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Because he didn't spell it right. HTTP_Referrer', I believe.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: Because he didn't spell it right.
Shocking! Who could have ever guessed that getting specifications from internet forums was not as reliable as reading the documentation? Really, I mean who?
 What can I say, IT'S FRIDAY! ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if there's an SDK or API to Search Server 2008 Express?
I want to specify some parameters for a seach on a SharePoint site and Search Server 2008 Express looks ideal.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Member 5972325 wrote: Can anyone tell me if there's an SDK or API to Search Server 2008 Express?
Sure, click here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I voted you a 5 by the way 
Anyway, of course I've googled it but I was directed to a page on MSDN:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc304521.aspx[^]
This says the following:
"The Microsoft Search Server 2008 administration object model is based on the Enterprise Search administration object model in Office SharePoint Server 2007 and includes additional members in the Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration Namespace."
...so a more informed reply to my original question would be, "No, the object model adds some additional members to the Enterprise Search administration object model".
I want to be able to access the Search Server Express 2008 object model without having to pay for MOSS. That's why I asked if there was a specific SDK
|
|
|
|
|
Member 5972325 wrote: I want to be able to access the Search Server Express 2008 object model without having to pay for MOSS.
Then you should have included that information in your post. The members of this site are mere humans and therefore have no telepathy powers.
Member 5972325 wrote: Anyway, of course I've googled it but I was directed to a page on MSDN:
Member 5972325 wrote: This says the following:
Yes, and if you follow links on that page you will find one that says the following:
Depending on which method overload you use, you might need to also include a reference in your project to the Microsot.Office.Server.dll or to the Microsoft.SharePoint.dll
Now while that dll needs to be obtained from a Sharepoint installation it does not require you having to pay for MOSS if you can obtain the DLL from a MOSS installation. Since you are working on a MOSS project I would imagine you have access to a MOSS installation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is that JavaScript doesn't know (nor does it care) what the root of your application is. Something you can do is, in your script code, add a server-side expression that represents your application root, and assign it to a variable. From there, you can concatenate your relative path values.
var applicationRoot = "<%= System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Request.ApplicationPath %>";
document.open(applicationRoot + "/myFolder/myDoc.htm");
|
|
|
|
|
looks like a good idea. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
