|
Hi everyone,
I've a problem with dropdown lists. The standart select/option's dropdown list is resized to the select's width, like whether the option is longer than select's width
[Select v]
[option 1]
[option 2]
...
I want the select's option list is resized longer widths, like
[select v]
[option 1 xxxxxxxx]
[option 2 yyyyyyyy]
...
How can i do this?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Good browsers will automatically resize the drop-down to fit the options displayed in it. For the unfortunate users of lesser browsers, you might try a hack like this: http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/dhtml/ui_select_with_fixed_width/demo.php[^]
Or just abandon drop-down select elements, and go with a list (set size to > 1).
Citizen 20.1.01 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the script (;
|
|
|
|
|
U have to set its width attribute using CSS...
in the dreamweaver u can write code like this...I have set it to 200 pixkels, u may set it to any suitable value....Plz follow the code...
optionvalue
T  hanks
"Programming is a fun"
|
|
|
|
|
In IE, this will also constrain the width of the dropdown (cutting off options longer than 200px in your example).
Citizen 20.1.01 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to add an IHTMLElement dynamically to the HTML that contain an "A" ActiveX control.
That I want to add is another "B" ActiveX control.
So.. I programmed in "A" activex source code as below.
I created new element.
/* I deleted bstr, SysFreeString, VARIANT etc.. to understand easily */
IHTMLElement* pObjectElement=NULL;
m_pDoc2->createElement("<object>", &pObjectElement);
pObjectElement->setAttribute("classid", "clsid:AF0DDB60-76F8-4ADC-BF58-563EB7DF2B9D", 0); // "B" ActiveX control's Clsid
pObjectElement->setAttribute("width", "600");
pObjectElement->setAttribute("height", "400");
and.. attached it to the bodyElement.
m_pDoc2->get_body(&pElement);
pElement->QueryInterface(IID_IHTMLBodyElement, (LPVOID*)&pBody);
pBody->QueryInterface (IID_IHTMLDOMNode, (LPVOID*)&pParent);
pObjectElement->QueryInterface (IID_IHTMLDOMNode, (LPVOID*)&pChild);
pParent->appendChild (pChild, NULL);
It works well.
And.. I created another new element "param" to send "MyValue" to the "B" ActiveX control.
/* I deleted bstr, SysFreeString, VARIANT etc.. to understand easily */
IHTMLElement* pParamElement=NULL;
m_pDoc2->createElement("<param>", &pParamElement);
pParamElement->setAttribute("name", "src");
pParamElement->setAttribute("value", "MyValue");
and... attached it to the object element.
/* I inserted this code before object element is appended to the body element. like this..
* pChild->appendChild (pParam, NULL);
* pParent->appendChild (pChild, NULL);
*/
pParamElement->QueryInterface (IID_IHTMLDOMNode, (LPVOID*)&pParam);
pChild->appendChild (pParam, NULL);
But It doesn't work.
"B" ActiveX control couldn't receive "MyValue".
There are any problems in "B" ActiveX control. It works well in common situation.
so.. I thought it failed to append <param> to <object> element.
so, I appended a code to confirm whether param element is contained or not.
Surprisingly, <param> could find in it.
...I really really... don't know how I can solve this problem.
If anybody knows it, please answer me.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, this seems like a horribly complicated method. And not really on-topic for the WebDev forum either.
vies00 wrote: /* I inserted this code before object element is appended to the body element. like this..
* pChild->appendChild (pParam, NULL);
* pParent->appendChild (pChild, NULL);
*/
Ok... Is that true? Are you adding the param to the object before adding the object to the body? Or did you try and then abandon that idea?
Citizen 20.1.01 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your reply.
It isn't suitable in this forum... so, I moved my question to COM forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All
In my asp.net 2.0 web application i am using AjaxToolKit version 1.0.20229.0 . Now the Issue is with IE 6.0 browser whenever the modal pop up is displaying browser hight is getting increased.
AJAX modal pup is adding pixels to the height of the browser now user can scrolls down the vertical scroll bar to infinite.
this is happening in IE 6 only its working fine in Mozilla and IE 7.0
Thanks and Regards
Sandeep
If If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
modified on Saturday, June 28, 2008 12:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Given that you didn't bother posting any code illustrating the problem, i'm going to assume you think it's specific to the ajax toolkit you're using. If so, you should take it up with whoever wrote that.
Citizen 20.1.01 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry to say but that's very rude way to give answer
Thanks and Regards
Sandeep
If If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
|
|
|
|
|
Again, you are incorrect.
Citizen 20.1.01 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
i work for company that have website were made by .net 1.1 after that i devlpoed project using .net 3.5
the problem is that last tuesday the website administrator has left before he deployed the my project pages in the web site when i tried to add it by my self it did not work and i tried several sthings but i dont know what to do
and here is the error
Exception type: ConfigurationErrorsException <br />
<br />
Exception message: Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
so can you help me?
modified on Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
You can't run 1.1 and 3.5 sites on the same IIS, I don't think. Either way, .NET 3.5 is obviously not installed on your web server.
Christian Graus
Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
no the .net 3.5 is installed
is it gonna work if i used diffrenet application pool
|
|
|
|
|
If it's installed, then you must have the server set up to use 1.1 instead. What IIS is it ? The latest one lets you set the .NET version, otherwise you need to run aspnet_regiis -i in the .NET 3.5 folder.
Christian Graus
Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
sorry but can you explin more to me because this is my first time with this things
|
|
|
|
|
Wow - I am looking and the program is not there for 3.5. I guess your only option is to configure it from IIS.
http://msjawahar.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/deploying-aspnet-applications/[^]
Like I said, if you configure your IIS for your 3.5 app, I don't expect your 1.1 apps will work anymore.
Christian Graus
Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
ok
thank you anyway
i'll stick to my 1.1 applications
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot repeat CANNOT run .net 1.1 and .net 3.5 apps in the same application pool, they must use different pools, otherwise the first request the pool gets after a recycle will load whatever version of the runtime is required to the detrement of the other apps...
to get this to work you need to look under the ASP.NET tab of the website properties, and ensure that the dropdown there is set to 2.0 because .net 3.5 runs version 2 of the CLR. IF and ONLY IF that option is not present run asp_RegIIS from the .net 2 directory..something like Microsoft .Net->Framework->v2.0.xxxxxxx some big long number...if you run aspnet_regIIS with the -i switch it will set ALL web apps to version 2 causeing wierd behavior in your .net 1.1 apps(my boss did this to me a while ago) you can use a ? switch or look at msdn to figure out what switches you need...there is a way to just register the new version but not set any web apps to use it which is probably what you want.
while your in the Framework folder under windows make sure there is a v3.5xxx directory if not you have to download and install v 3.5
either way after that you just need to create a new app pool and assign your new web app to it in the home directory tab of the website properties...IF you are not running IIS 6 you might not need a new app pool in 5 or 5.1(xp) i dont think you can set up your own app pools. Hope thi shelps...i just did an upgrade for most of our sites from 1.1 to 3.5 a month or so ago and this is exactly what i did.
Please remember to rate helpful or unhelpful answers, it lets us and people reading the forums know if our answers are any good.
|
|
|
|
|
how i can create an asp.net cod for hotel reservation and sign in as well as sign out
|
|
|
|
|
Well, not by asking in multiple forums.
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
AGAIN !!!
Please someone ban this guy 
Kazz
"Users are there to click on things, not think. Let the archs do the damn thinking."
|
|
|
|
|
I reiterate - if you don't know how to code, don't go bidding on rentacoder jobs.
Christian Graus
Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: if you don't know how to code, don't go bidding on rentacoder jobs
Oh, one of those morons 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
