|
i want to write a query to adding the numeric values in one row
how to do that ?
regards
|
|
|
|
|
So whats the prob??
select column1+column2+column3+.... from table.
When you fail to plan, you are planning to fail.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
i m new in database,i m using a SDI type appliaction in VC++ 2005, and MS-Access Datase through ODBC.
i m add class using MFC ODBC Consumer,and add desired database and its table for code.
By default it is derived from CRecordset. here GetDefaultConnect() for default connection and GetDefaultSQL() is present.
i want to know that in GetDefaultConnect() the connection string or path of database present, if i run my application on other computer then it gives an error, can i change the path in GetDefaultConnect(),
i dont knoe how can use it.
please tell me what string i pass in GetDefaultConnect() for execute my application properly for each computer.
Thanks in advance.
I m waiting for ur Valuable suggetions.
IN A DAY, WHEN YOU DON'T COME ACROSS ANY PROBLEMS - YOU CAN BE SURE THAT YOU ARE TRAVELLING IN A WRONG PATH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I have the following defined in a class that I'm using to access and export the contents of an SQL Compact database. After having read around some I was under the impression that the following code would work, but its failing to actually LOAD any data from the database. Any help would be great.
to create my typed dataset:
SSdbDataSet ds = new SSdbDataSet();
The method to load the entire database from the .sdf file is:
public void ExportDatabaseXML()
{
ds.Clear();
ds.localSamples.Load(GetLocalSamplesReader());
ds.WriteXml("SStest.xml", XmlWriteMode.WriteSchema);
}
And there is this 'utility' method to create the reader:
private IDataReader GetLocalSamplesReader()
{
return ds.localSamples.CreateDataReader();
}
I'm a bit stuck now as I was under the impression that the Load() method pulled all the data from the underlying datatable.
Any pointers would be great.
Jammer
Going where everyone here has gone before! 
My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Guys,
Lets say we have a table T1 that have a numeric field F:
Table T1 (int ID, int F)
I need to update this table and set F to the MAX +1 to insure uniqueness:
UPDATE T1
SET F = (SELECT ISNULL(MAX(F),0) + 1)
WHERE ID IN(1,2)
The thing is I end up with both IDs 1 and 2 having the same value for F. I remember doing but what do I have to change so that Max is calucated for row in T1 so that if my initial table is like:
ID F
1 1
2 2
Running the update query will get the following result
ID F
1 3
2 4
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
UPDATE T1<br />
SET F = (SELECT top 1 ISNULL(MAX(t2.F),0) + 2 from T1 as t2 where t2.id=T1.ID)<br />
WHERE ID IN(1,2)
I Love T-SQL
"Don't torture yourself,let the life to do it for you."
|
|
|
|
|
Any easy way to do that is:
DECLARE @I INT
SELECT @I = MAX(F) FROM T1
UPDATE T1
SET @I = F = @I + 1
Change T1 and F for your actual names.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a table similar to the following :-
Id, BigInt, IsIdentity
Name, VarChar(50)
ParentId, BigInt, Allows Nulls
Therefore I could have data as follows
Id Name ParentId
-- ---- --------
1 Fred Null
2 Fred 1
3 Fred 1
4 Fred 2
5 Fred 4
Therefore data is structured as follows :-
1, Fred
..2, Fred
....4, Fred
......5, Fred
..3, Fred
What I need to do, (and this is where my weak T-SQL lets me down) is when the Name is change for row 1, an update cascades through the table and updates and related row i.e. where ParentId = Id of row updated.
My thoughts are to use an trigger on Update, but I need some help with the code.
Also, if I understand the update tigger correctly, and the option is enabled at Database level, the rows being updated by the trigger will cause the trigger to fire again, thus the update with cascade down the tree.
Any assistance is much appreicated.
Steve Jowett
-------------------------
It is offen dangerous to try and see someone else's point of view, without proper training. Douglas Adams (Mostly Harmless)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, try something like this:
CREATE TRIGGER [Table1_Update] ON [dbo].[Table1]
FOR UPDATE
AS
IF EXISTS(SELECT * FROM inserted)
UPDATE Table1 SET [Name] = I.[Name] FROM Table1 T INNER JOIN inserted I ON T.ParentID = I.ID
You're right in that the trigger recurse option needs to be enabled (disabled by default), but be aware that you're limited to 32 levels in the recursion stack (sql server 2000 - don't know limit in SQL2005), so you're tree must be limited to max 32 levels
"An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind"
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the example code and the additional info.
Steve Jowett
-------------------------
It is offen dangerous to try and see someone else's point of view, without proper training. Douglas Adams (Mostly Harmless)
|
|
|
|
|
Steve
I have a nasty feeling you are setting yourself up for a disaster. I don't understand your requirement but some of your statements are suspect.
the field name should never be used in a relationship. It should be stored once and the ID used to define your heirachy. You need 2 tables for this operation.
Name Table
ID int, Name varchar(?)
Link Table
ID int, ParentID int
Id ParentId
-- --------
1 Null
2 1
3 1
4 2
5 4
and join out to the name table (twice for ID and ParentID).
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I understand your concerns and thanks for raising them. I did not go too deeply into what I need to achieve because I did not think it relevent to the problem (i.e. my lack of knowledge) at the time.
Just to make things clear, the problem I have is will a database created and maintained by a third-party product, namely Sage SalesLogix CRM package. I have a requirement where the principle contact at a parent account is also the principle contact at each associated child account, but SalesLogix does not cater for this requirement as standard. Therefore some coding has been done on SalexLogix that when a child account is associated with the parent account, then principle contact of the parent is copied to child. So far so good.
Now the problem is, that when the details of the contact is changed, it is only for the that one record. This is where the trigger comes into play. What I want to do is when the details of a contact is changed, all duplicate(ish) records are updated to reflect the change, hence my example showing a column called 'Name' with the same value.
Thanks again for you concern.
Best regards
Steve Jowett
-------------------------
It is offen dangerous to try and see someone else's point of view, without proper training. Douglas Adams (Mostly Harmless)
|
|
|
|
|
Steven, this should be held us as a classic DB design error 101 - typical of Sage.
Are you attempting this in SageLogix (not), if so then my sympathy.
I would naturally [avoid] triggers because I hate them . If you can inject an Exec into the save process I would use a stored proc to synch the data based on the ParentID and new contact name. I presume the user can update the contact from either the child or the parent.
Good luck
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I am using following query ..
select siid as Sid,biid as Bid,(select iname from Ol_items where iid=siid) as SIName,(select iname from Ol_items where iid=biid) as BIName from Ol_Wishlist
ouput is
Sid Bid SIName BIName
10 27 NULL Spice
here SINAME = null value
but I want if not null display the data ..if null,Instead of NULL Some text like NO and
Sid Bid SIName BIName
10 27 NO Spice
anybody know plz reply me..
thanks
Rajendran.AL
|
|
|
|
|
This should do it (around each of the subqueries):
COALESCE((select iname ...), 'NO') as ...
Look up the COALESCE function in the documentation for details.
Peter the small turnip
(1) It Has To Work. --RFC 1925[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Its working fine.....Thanks alot...
Rajendran.AL
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I would use a CASE for that, although as the other poster suggested a COALESCE would work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giorgi Dalakishvili wrote: You can use ISNULL
yes, but coalesce is standard, so I prefer it to isnull which is not.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use coalesce function:
select siid as Sid,biid as Bid,coalesce ((select iname from Ol_items where iid=siid),'NO') as SIName,(select iname from Ol_items where iid=biid) as BIName from Ol_Wishlist
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys
ive got a table in my DB, employee... this table has a column "EndOfEmployment" which is DATETIME and obviously nullable
yesterday while trying to write a query to count the number of "Active" employees i came across a strange issue... the query is as follows
SELECT count(Emp_EmployeeNumber)
FROM Employee
WHERE Emp_EmploymentStatus = 'A' OR (Emp_EmploymentStatus = 'T' AND (Emp_EndOfEmployment = NULL OR Emp_EndOfEmployment < @todaysDate))
i noticed that when the EndOfEmployment field does not get data in the insert statement, it DOES NOT get a value of NULL... so i tried giving it a value of NULL in the insert statement and that still didnt work.
then i tried Emp_EndOfEmployment = '' instead of Emp_EndOfEmployment = NULL in the WHERE clause but still no luck
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanx
Harvey Saayman - South Africa
Junior Developer
.Net, C#, SQL
think BIG and kick ASS
you.suck = (you.passion != Programming)
|
|
|
|
|
You can't normally compare anything to NULL with the = operator (the result isn't true or false, but NULL - anything you do on a NULL is NULL). You need to use IS NULL / IS NOT NULL or COALESCE.
If you KNOW that you're looking for NULL, do this:
... WHERE (thefield IS NULL) OR (thefield < @limit)
or:
... WHERE COALESCE(thefield, '1900-01-01') < @limit
That's assuming you have a suitable "NULL equivalent" value to use (as in 1900-01-01). Note that the YYYY-MM-DD layout is unambiguous and always converts automatically to datetime in SQL, regardless of regional settings. Any other format needs an explicit CONVERT with a style parameter to work internationally. Also - the datetime/smalldatetime are the only times where picking a good minimum value is problematic, because:
datetime: 1753-01-01 is the first valid date.
smalldatetime: 1900-01-01 is the first valid date.
Numeric and string columns are easier.
BONUS:
Sometimes you don't even know what you're looking for (such as in a parameterized query). This is a good one (assuming GroupId can be null but never 0 - as in a foreign key relation with an identity field):
... WHERE COALESCE(GroupId, 0) = COALESCE(@param1, 0)...
Figuring that out a) saved me a lot of IFs and CASEs, and b) made me feel pretty stupid about not having done it sooner...
Peter the small turnip
(1) It Has To Work. --RFC 1925[^]
|
|
|
|
|
How do I obtain the size of a particular database schema, not just a table, programatically using C# or VB.NET? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm assuming that you use MS SQL Server,
Execute the sp_helpdb 'DBNAME' stored procedure. It will return 2 result sets, the first contains the db_size field which is the total size (data and log) of the database.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
