|
It's been criticised a lot for not using diagrams etc. more, but Petzold uses my writing style, highly descriptive and very clear, plain narrative. I have already even forgotten much of what I have read, but it has been a learning process that I'm sure has embedded an understanding of WPF concepts that I plan to re-enforce by stopping every few chapters and playing with all the stuff he has described. When I studied, my favourite parts of the textbox were the exercises at the end of each chapter. I inevitably always did them all. It's a pity more conventional books don't include them.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing wrong with tables. If it's a table, it's a table, why be fancy for the sake of some people's religious preference ?
CSS is a bitch, don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
Christian Graus
Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: CSS is a bitch, don't let anyone tell you otherwise
Anything with a short-cut syntax like that is evil. 
|
|
|
|
|
For general tutorials / info, see here: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1640&msg=2471435[^]
The three column layout is actually a pretty good fit for CSS. You can accomplish it in several ways - i usually go with either absolute positioning or floating, depending on the particular needs of the page. And using CSS gives you an immediate advantage over tables: you can easily remove or reposition the side columns (for printing or smaller screens) without having to rewrite the whole page. This article should give you a good start[^].
Citizen 20.1.01 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
|
|
|
|
|
In my webform,i am using two javascripts.i am calling both these functions in the body onload().when i am adding one more javascript in the form the other two javascripts are not working.the third javascript does not have a onload function,it just pasted in a table.
why this is happening..?pls help.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you should post some code... One of us can take a look at it... We cannot solve your problem by just telling 'something is wrong'.
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any tutorials out there about how to get this to work?
I've been trying to get Facebox up and running as part of my site, the necessary libraries are included through a ContentPlaceHolder in the head section of the master page.
But when I try to view the page ASP.NET throws a fit saying about an unexpected dollar ($) sign on line 23 of the uncompressed jQuery script. I'm guessing this is because it's trying to validate the javascript, is there anyway to turn this off?
Configuration: Visual Studio 2008 Professional using an IIS directory to view the results. Running on IIS 7 on Vistal Ultimate x64.
Many thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Since when does ASP.NET parse js files?
Sorry, i haven't run into this yet.
|
|
|
|
|
I found it odd, but could it be something to do with IIS background compiling it to speed things up? Haven't got a clue. Check out this error[^]
Here are the relevant lines of code:
<asp:Content ID="Header" ContentPlaceHolderID="HeadPlaceHolder" runat="server">
<script runat="server" src="~/Scripting/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</asp:Content>
I'm as confused as you are. I'll check through the mappings in IIS to see if something stupid's happening, but this is a vanilla install and a dedicated website set up for it so...
|
|
|
|
|
Ed.Poore wrote: <script runat="server" src="
Wait... what's all this then? Unless there's another mode for <script runat="server"> tags that i'm not aware of (which is... quite possible), this'll try to integrate jquery into your server-side code (probably not what you want).
Ditch the runat=... attribute, see if that doesn't fix it.
|
|
|
|
|
That's fixed it thanks oh Shog! 
Now, any idea of an easy way to get it to escape the "~/" bit? That's why I'd included the runat attribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And thanks in advance for your question.
(Now you have to ask one).
Brad
Australian
The PHP MVP
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
How can we put the thread in java script.Can any body plz tell me.
In my priject one function like Funtction() required to call in thread.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't. Current Javascript environments are single-threaded by design. You can, however, use timers, callbacks, and asynchronous HTTP methods to implement reasonably responsive interfaces, provided you leave the heavy lifting to the browser or server.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't imagine that a threaded environment and a stateless environment are a good mix. How do you control multiple threads in an environment where all threads are discarded when you move to the next page ? Why would you need them ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want a javascript that allows(1) all Alphabets
(2) alphabets and Numbers but starting with alphabet
(3) alphabets and Numbers but starting with alphabet can also allow
.(dot character) and @ character
My script should allow any of the above only.
Please help me on this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am developing a cross tab crystal report in vb.net....
I want to suppress entire coulmn based on some condition...
format formula editor and all, just suppresses the field and leaves a blank space.
I dont even want to remove that blank coulmn also...could any one help
|
|
|
|
|
I have a comment capture user control. I know, I've been bad, and used a table for laying out input controls, but it got the job done. Until now.
I try and set a control level style by enclosing all content in a div, with the styling "font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;". This works on content I have above the table, a list of radio buttons, and the styling, defined in a master page, applied above and below these, works. Only in the table does the content just ignore my styling and stubbornly retain the default font family and size I used when I created it.
|
|
|
|
|
Styling a div does not guarantee that all items contained within it will also retain the same style - you might need to set the style specifically for your input elements.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it looks like the table wanted the style explicitly applied to itself. Oh, woe, the pains of layout. 
|
|
|
|
|
Create a CSS class and apply the same class to the containing div and to the table.
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: Oh, woe, the pains of layout
Welcome to the wonderful world of web development!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
