C#

Skippums wrote:

I am also disappointed that an interface member who returns void (nothing) cannot be implemented by a method that returns some other type.

Christian Graus wrote:

Why not learn C# instead of trying to make it be C++ ?

Skippums wrote:

I just expected that a new language would go the extra mile and give me more flexibility, instead of restricting me so much that I am spending about a tenth of my time jumping through hoops to trick the language into working how I need it to.

Skippums wrote:

As far as your suggestion, "You should probably clean up your design before you start coding", I completely disagree.

Skippums wrote:

If I have class A in namespace NA, and class B in namespace NB which inherits from class A, to include class B I am forced to say that I am using namespace NA

Skippums wrote:

Oh well, I guess that I will have to start implementing my own compiler so I don't have to put up with the lack of thought and foresight by the "greatest minds" in our field.

SK Genius wrote:

C# is more of a mix between java and c++

for(uniqueID id=0; id<10; id++) Console.WriteLine(id.ToString());

using uniqueID=System.Int32;

Christian Graus wrote:

typedefs are plain ugly. They are a holdover from C, I thought.

using IntList = System.Collections.Generic.List<int>;

...

public void Foo()
{
   IntList list = new IntList();
   list.Add(5);
   ...
}

Skippums wrote:

the removal of the ever useful typedef

// Uncomment one of these
// using MyType = System.Int32 ;
// using MyType = System.Double ;
// using MyType = System.Decimal ;
// using MyType = System.String ;
 
namespace Test
{
    class Test
    {
        private static MyType
        F
        (
            MyType x
        )
        {
            return ( x + x ) ;
        }
 
        [System.STAThreadAttribute]
        static void
        Main
        (
            string[] args
        )
        {
            try
            {
                System.Console.WriteLine ( F ( 2 ) ) ;
            }
            catch ( System.Exception err )
            {
                System.Console.WriteLine ( err.Message ) ;
            }
 
            return ;
        }
    }
}

Skippums wrote:

I will still have to modify the value in a number of places after the fact

Skippums wrote:

thanks for your input!