|
Great, that's it.. 
Thanks for the support.
Kurt
|
|
|
|
|
When I click on the User folder,
Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\CD Burning
Local Settings is not visible, I dont see an area to show hidden folders. XP Home.
Found it by Search to include Hidden Folders and Files, how do we unhide them please.
EDIT
Control Panel, Appearance & Themes, Folder Options, View TAB, then in Advance Settings Block choose Show hidden files and folders Option Button, click Apply and OK, DONE.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean your hidden files are not showing on PC..?
SAJAN A PILLAI
C#.NET Programmer
TELESOFT INDIA PVT LTD...
BANGALORE
"Winners don't do different things. They do things differently. ...
|
|
|
|
|
Darn those hidden files, how can I burn a CD if the files are hidden, the last paragraph of my post described how to make them un-hidden, they are not hidding now, I found them.
If the files and folders can be hidden by reversing the un-hide process, the folders show up as a lighter icon, not as bright as folders that do not formally get hidden.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the difference between XP Home and XP Pro is that XP Pro supports up to two microprocessors, while XP Home supports only one. While that refers to physical CPUs, does it also apply to the new dual-core CPUs? In other words, would XP Home not be able to use one of the cores?
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not positive, but I believe that it won't be able to take advantge of the "second" processor. Unless someone else is able to give you a definitive answer, the best way to find out will be to install it and see what happens.
. [modification 9:15 Tuesday 23rd October, 2007]Looks like I was wrong, based on the comments below. It should be able to take advantage of both cores, just not multiple physically separate chips.[/modification]
|
|
|
|
|
DavidCrow wrote: would XP Home not be able to use one of the cores
XP Home can only support one physical processor but does recognise and support multiple cores, it just installs a new HAL so that it can use both cores.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft's licensing is based on processor sockets, not on physical or logical cores, from Windows XP up. You should be able to use all four cores of a Core 2 Quad processor package (which is actually two chips internally, IIRC!) on XP Home.
DoEvents: Generating unexpected recursion since 1991
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, many other software companies were going the route of saying that 2 cores on one socket is 2 CPU's but thankfully Microsoft disagreed. Things could have gotten mighty expensive otherwise especially with Sql Server and stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
How many different objects can be forwarded to from a mailbox?
“If we are all in agreement on the decision - then I propose we postpone further discussion of this matter until our next meeting to give ourselves time to develop disagreement and perhaps gain some understanding of what the decision is all about.”-Alfred P. Sloan
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i would like to know how to fix my issue.
situation:
i've a little portal built for asp.net with web services, in a machine that's inside a windows 2003 active directory integrated and distributed in 2 geographic zone...this zones speaks both through a router vpn...
so, there are two machines involved in this case...one is the web server portal machine and another one is repository server located in other zone with his public ip (but it's also configured to speak inside the vpn lan)
however, normally inside this portal the user (after logged in) can download one or more files.
in the portal machine web.config i've setting up to point to another machine (that has a public ip) to download files from that repository ....my issue is to block anonymous access but grant access to asp.net user of machine portal....infact if i disable anonymous access, the user authenticated using asp.net user machine, cannot downolad or better it gives me the classic error of page not found....sure disabling the anonymous access nobody can access, but how can i block everyone to point the path directly to download files and permit to download them only inside my portal (after logged in) ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
I asked this question on the Lounge but it seems it was correct forum for this question.
What is it and how can I solve it?
On my system when I am using of Internet Explorer(IE6 with SP1 and OS is XP) its working good and opens sites without problem but after a time(Random) sudden it freeze and I must use of Task Manager for close it,it contains all Internet explorer that are opens.
I scaned my system for viruses and didnt find any virus
|
|
|
|
|
maybe you could try going into windows components (add/remove programs -> add/remove windows components) and uninstalling/reinstalling it. Alternatively, upgrade to IE7 and see if your situation changes at all there
|
|
|
|
|
Do you know how can I solve this problem if I want to use of IE6.
|
|
|
|
|
Just curious. When did this behavior first begin?
“If we are all in agreement on the decision - then I propose we postpone further discussion of this matter until our next meeting to give ourselves time to develop disagreement and perhaps gain some understanding of what the decision is all about.”-Alfred P. Sloan
|
|
|
|
|
Its random and dont has any time.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen this problem as well. In my case, it was always when using Adobe's PDF viewer. This seems to hang IE for long periods of time.
|
|
|
|
|
But I dont use of Adobe's PDF viewer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
in my system, there are two exe with name of "explorer.exe" that they are running!
if i end the process of first(main) explorer.exe, the second one runs explorer.exe(main) and both processes are listed in processes list(windows task manager)
do a virus do this work? or ... ???
Zo.Naderi-Iran
|
|
|
|
|
no, you can run as many copies of explorer as you like.
|
|
|
|
|
but, i don't end the main explorer.exe!
(the main explorer.exe == the parent of processes)
second explorer.exe runs the main explorer.exe, expressly!
why does system run two, spontaneous, explorer.exe?
Zo.Naderi-Iran
|
|
|
|
|
The explorer.exe process is also the process that acts as the operating system "shell" (your desktop, task tray, etc.) as well as the process that acts as the "explorer" window you see when you click on the "Computer" icon or the "Windows Explorer" application.
|
|
|
|
|
But I have only an explorer on the OS but on the other OS when I want to open a drive I have two explorers do you know why?
|
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
Error Deleting File or Folder
---------------------------
Cannot delete <filename>: Access is denied.
Make sure the disk is not full or write-protected
and that the file is not currently in use.
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
This is the message I get when trying to delete two files generated by MSVC 6.0. Both the .exe and the .ilk file are affected. I cannot generate a new executable because the existing one cannot be deleted. This is what VC says:
Linking...
LINK : LNK4073: cannot create map for .ILK file; linking nonincrementally
LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file ".\<filename>.exe"
Error executing link.exe.
Note: <filename> is a placeholder in this message for the actual name.
The .exe file no longer has its custom icon and the .ilk file is 0 bytes. I've tried logging off but that does not work.
Does anyone out there know of a tool that can perform an unconditional delete?
TIA!
'til next we type...
HAVE FUN!! -- Jesse
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
