Re: looking for source code - C# Discussion Boards

marwan_siala23-Feb-07 6:42

23-Feb-07 6:42

i am working on a software... the main purpose is to capture audio and video then send them through network using UDP protocol then the receiver preview it ... so it is a live capture...
i really need the source code .in C# is better. i have searched the articles but found nothing pleas i am running out of time

thanks allot

Re: looking for source code

BoneSoft23-Feb-07 7:09

BoneSoft

23-Feb-07 7:09

Try this out, number 9 should help...

School Help[^]

Good luck. Big Grin | :-D

Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

Re: looking for source code

marwan_siala23-Feb-07 7:26

marwan_siala

23-Feb-07 7:26

do not worry about number 9...
thanks any way

Re: looking for source code

Christian Graus23-Feb-07 7:27

Christian Graus

23-Feb-07 7:27

marwan_siala wrote:
pleas i am running out of time

If this is your work, you should never take on a job unless you know how to do it, or what resources you need to do it.

If this is school work, your class will have given you all the information you need.

Audio/Video capture happens using DirectX. I know for a fact there are many resources on this site in this regard. Sending information through a network connection should not be difficult, and playing video on the other end is trivial.

No-one here is going to write your project for you, if it's due now, you should have realised sooner that you were stuck, and asked questions to help you get the info you need to do your own work.

Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

Re: looking for source code

marwan_siala23-Feb-07 7:50

marwan_siala

23-Feb-07 7:50

i am just asking if some one already did what i am looking for as i said i am running out of time cuz i have a lot of other works to do...
how ever Audio/Video using DirectX ,i have already take it from an article witch is working properly and Sending information through a network connection is really pace of cake ... but the problem as i figured out that DirectX can not deal with network connection so there must be another source.
i have posted a request
http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?forumid=1649&select=1896415&df=100&fr=1175.5#xx1896415xx

thanks any way

Re: looking for source code

Dave Kreskowiak23-Feb-07 10:35

Dave Kreskowiak

23-Feb-07 10:35

marwan_siala wrote:
i am running out of time cuz i have a lot of other works to do...

So how is passing off someone elses work as your own going to help? What are you going to do when the code breaks and you have no idea how it works?

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

Re: looking for source code

marwan_siala23-Feb-07 10:53

marwan_siala

23-Feb-07 10:53

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
So how is passing off someone elses work as your own going to help?

i believe we are all here to help each other and if i got this work from some one else i will not say it is mine... that is not my manners

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
What are you going to do when the code breaks and you have no idea how it works?

i know this code is not a big deal... and i know it is understandable by any one.

Re: looking for source code

Dave Kreskowiak23-Feb-07 12:31

Dave Kreskowiak

23-Feb-07 12:31

marwan_siala wrote:
i believe we are all here to help each other and if i got this work from some one else i will not say it is mine... that is not my manners

We're here to help you write your own code. Not just hand over something prewritten for you.

marwan_siala wrote:
and i know it is understandable by any one.

Wanna bet?

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

Re: looking for source code

Christian Graus23-Feb-07 18:08

Christian Graus

23-Feb-07 18:08

It's not a big deal AND it's understood by anyone, yet he can't write it ? Confused | :confused:

I am convinced that there is a subset of CPians that represents people who take RentaCoder jobs then post questions here to get them done. I'm also convinced that you and I will have jobs for a long time, judging by how many people post homework here, verbatim.

You're not summitting, are you ? I leave next Friday.

Re: looking for source code

Dave Kreskowiak24-Feb-07 5:24

Dave Kreskowiak

24-Feb-07 5:24

Christian Graus wrote:
It's not a big deal AND it's understood by anyone, yet he can't write it ?

My point exactly! Big Grin | :-D

Christian Graus wrote:
I am convinced that there is a subset of CPians that represents people who take RentaCoder jobs then post questions here to get them done.

You know, I haven't thought of that, but your absolutely right. I'd be willing to bet that's exactly what's going on! D'Oh! | :doh:

Christian Graus wrote:
You're not summitting, are you ? I leave next Friday.

No, I'm not Cry | :((

I'm still working 60-80 a week pulling my hair out over what other people are building and calling "Production Quality". Mad | :mad:

Sadly, it's my yob to support the crap they put out and call "tested".

I have sweatshirt I'm seriouly thinking of wearing to work. Acrossed the front it say "Is it me, or is this place a festival of idiots?";)

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

Re: looking for source code [modified]

marwan_siala26-Feb-07 1:25

marwan_siala

26-Feb-07 1:25

ok i have gain time extension... and i am stuck here...
as i said i am using c# .net 2005
i need to convert Byte[] to network stream .. how is that
thanks

or better convert Byte[] to image ( using System.Drawing )

-- modified at 11:52 Monday 26th February, 2007

Validate Textbox to acept numeric values with in a DATALIST

tossurboss200223-Feb-07 6:30

tossurboss2002

23-Feb-07 6:30

Hi All,

I am using datlist on the basket page, in the i have a text box for quantity.
as you all know that there will be multiple lines in the basket i just get the dataset and bind that to Datalist.
I have to validate the textbox quantity to accept only the numberic chars. I was trying to capture the kedown event which i cannot use as the textbox is bound on datalist.
Can any one give me some suggestions of advice how to hadle this.

Parent Child relationship issue

Saira Tanwir23-Feb-07 6:01

Saira Tanwir

23-Feb-07 6:01

Hi all

iwant to know that cn an application have two or three parent forms??

i have a MainForm which is my current parent form. i have form1, form2, form3, form4 which are child to the MainForm.

now i want my form2 to be child to form1 and form1 to be child of MainForm.

how can i do this? if this is just not possible then plz tell me whether my application can have two parent forms like this:

MainForm ---> form1, form2

Form3 ----> form4

Re: Parent Child relationship issue

Dave Kreskowiak23-Feb-07 7:51

Dave Kreskowiak

23-Feb-07 7:51

It's not really clear what you're talking about so...

There can only be one top level startup form. This form holds your application's message pump. If this form gets closed, your entire application closes with it.

Now, the rest depends on what you mean by Child forms. If you simply launching a child form by creating a new form object and showing it with .Show() or .ShowDialog(), then you can have multiple levels of children, like this:

Startup Form
         |
         +--->Main Form
         |        |
         |        +--->Child Form
         |        |
         |        +--->Child Form
         |                 |
         |                 +--->Child Form
         |
         +--->2nd Main Form
                  |
                  +--->Child Form
                  |
                  +--->Child Form

If you're talking about MDI Child forms, you can have multiple parent forms, each with it's own set of MDI Children. But, under Windows, it's impossible to have an MDI Child be a MDI Parent to another MDI Child form. In other words, a form cannot be both and MDI Child AND MDI Parent at the same time. You can do this:

Startup Form
         |
         +--->MDI Parent Form
         |        |
         |        +--->MDI Child Form
         |        |
         |        +--->MDI Child Form
         |
         +--->2nd MDI Parent Form
                  |
                  +--->MDI Child Form
                  |
                  +--->MDI Child Form

You CAN NOT do this:

Startup Form
         |
         +--->MDI Parent Form
                  |
                  +--->MDI Child Form
                           |
                           +--->MDI Child Form
                           |
                           +--->MDI Child Form

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

Re: Parent Child relationship issue

Saira Tanwir24-Feb-07 3:47

Saira Tanwir

24-Feb-07 3:47

hi plz tell me if this is possible

Startup Form <br />
      |<br />
      +--->MDI Parent Form -->MDI Child Form-->Child Form

now what i wanted to know was that can the Child Form be an MdiChild of the MDI Parent Form and the Child Form at the same time?

Re: Parent Child relationship issue

Dave Kreskowiak24-Feb-07 5:45

Dave Kreskowiak

24-Feb-07 5:45

Yes, it is. An MDI Child form can launch an instance of another form, so long as the MDI Child does not try and become an MDI Parent to that new form.

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

Re: Parent Child relationship issue

mike montagne23-Feb-07 14:26

mike montagne

23-Feb-07 14:26

Is it even legal to have a parent-child relationship anymore?

Storing Application Settings

mail57235223-Feb-07 5:59

mail572352

23-Feb-07 5:59

What's the best way of storing an application setting to read it later? Do I have to resort to a text file or is there some better way with .NET 2.0?

Re: Storing Application Settings

kubben23-Feb-07 6:04

kubben

23-Feb-07 6:04

I would store them in the app.config file.

// Get the application configuration file.
System.Configuration.Configuration config =
ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(
ConfigurationUserLevel.None);
///Make changes to the config file. Perhaps in someplace like appSettings
//then save
config.Save();

Hope that helps.
Ben

Re: Storing Application Settings

BoneSoft23-Feb-07 6:07

BoneSoft

23-Feb-07 6:07

Depends on your needs. If it's simple data, use an App.config or the Web.config if you're doing a web app. You can just add keys to them which are easy enough to retrieve.

<configuration>
  <appSettings>
    <add key="field" value="1" />
  </appSettings>
  ...
</configuration>

Then in code you can access them with something like...

string field = System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings("field");

But if you have more complex data that you need to store, I usually do my own XML structure and use something like Skeleton Crew[^] to build a code model to use it with.

Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

Public member vs. public property

cueshot23-Feb-07 5:45

cueshot

23-Feb-07 5:45

Which is better?

1. Set a member of a class as public

<br />
public class SearchBox<br />
{<br />
  public string keyWordString;<br />
<br />
  public SearchBox()<br />
  {<br />
  }<br />
}<br />

-or-

2. Set a member of a class as private and create a public property for that member.

<br />
public class SearchBox<br />
{<br />
  private string keyWordString;<br />
<br />
  public string KeyWord<br />
  {<br />
    get<br />
    {<br />
      return this.keyWordString;<br />
    }<br />
<br />
    set<br />
    {<br />
      this.keyWordString = value;<br />
    }<br />
  }<br />
<br />
  public SearchBox()<br />
  {<br />
  }<br />
}<br />

Both options do the same action. What are the advantages/disadvantages of one over the other?

Thanks

Rob Tallent

Re: Public member vs. public property

kubben23-Feb-07 5:49

kubben

23-Feb-07 5:49

Always use Public properties. It is good OO design along with allowing you to only give out what is needed. It is easy to change the public property to readonly by removing the set method. You can't really do that with the Public Var. Also the public method allows you to do some extra coding if needed. Perhaps in the Get method you have some stuff like:

if (this.keywordstring == null)
{
//get default from where ever...
}

Anyway that is my two cents.

Ben

Re: Public member vs. public property

BoneSoft23-Feb-07 5:50

BoneSoft

23-Feb-07 5:50

Encapsulating your data members by hiding them and exposing a property lets you control access to the member. Just a public field allows somebody to put any value in the variable, which may or may not be a valid value for the class.

All your classes should have well defined expected input. It should be able to guaranty a valid result given expected input, so you have to be able to control that input and notify when the input is invalid.

Does that help?

Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

Re: Public member vs. public property

cueshot23-Feb-07 6:04

cueshot

23-Feb-07 6:04

Yes, thanks.

Rob Tallent

Re: Public member vs. public property

Stefan Troschuetz23-Feb-07 5:51

Stefan Troschuetz

23-Feb-07 5:51

Properties have many uses: they can validate data before allowing a change; they can transparently expose data on a class where that data is actually retrieved from some other source, such as a database; they can take an action when data is changed, such as raising an event, or changing the value of other fields; they can be read-only.

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook

www.troschuetz.de

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.