|
Use a timer, a timers interval is set in milliseconds.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
That's surprising. I would have thought that calling Sleep(100); would suspend the process for at least (but not necessarily exactly) 100mSec.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
So you are saying that new fast processors alter time? milliseconds are milliseconds (I thought).
pblais wrote: Also... what is the accuracy of, let's say, Sleep(20). How close to waiting 20 msecs will that be?
I believe the accuracy of Sleep() can vary from +-10ms to +-55ms, depending on the system.
A possibly interesting article: Precision is not the same as accuracy[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Salsbery wrote: So you are saying that new fast processors alter time? milliseconds are milliseconds (I thought).
Everyone likes a wise cracker
|
|
|
|
|
 You're the one that stated "Now my Sleep()'s are too short"
If you choose to use a timer then you'll need to use a multimedia timer. Chances are a WM_TIMER
through the SetTimer API is going to be just as inaccurate.
I agree with another poster that the problem is probably related to the time the thread's awake,
not the time it's suspended in Sleep().
Do you do I/O with the external device you are trying to sync to? If so, is there any way you
can use overlapped I/O or soething to make it a bit more event driven instead of trying to fine-
tune timeslices of threads?
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Salsbery wrote: Do you do I/O with the external device you are trying to sync to? If so, is there any way you
can use overlapped I/O or soething to make it a bit more event driven instead of trying to fine-
tune timeslices of threads?
Yes sometimes. I am writing test software. Sometimes I have to wait for another piece of test equimpmen to go through it's boot up self test and I have no way knowing when it is done. I do know that it takes it approximately 300 mSec. So I put a Sleep(350) in my code to wait for it. I have recently found, on some newer/faster PCs that the application isn't waiting long enough...
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect the problem is in the ratio of the “wake time” to the “sleep time”. On faster machines the “wake time” is lower but the “sleep time” remains about the same.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
pblais wrote: I don't have anyway to handshake with this device/application.
pblais wrote: when I tried running my app in one of the newer PCs
pblais wrote: Now my Sleep()'s are too short.
Maybe the parameter for the Sleep() call or Timer event should be configurable rather than hard coded? 
Otherwise at some point your application will be Sleep()ing with the fishes.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: Maybe the parameter for the Sleep() call or Timer event should be configurable rather than hard coded?
And use a trackbar for fine-tuning!
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: Maybe the parameter for the Sleep() call or Timer event should be configurable rather than hard coded?
I like that idea... How would I make configurable?
|
|
|
|
|
pblais wrote: How would I make configurable?
Instead of Sleep(100)
something like this:
Sleep( Config.Milliseconds);
where the number in that variable is provided by a user or administrator.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if he wants special sauce on his Fish Filet?
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
 The whole thing brings back memories of my first computer job - interfacing with a
home-brewed laser scanner. All the magic numbers in the legacy code, and how the new 386
CPU messed it all up LOL! To this day, it's still referred to (by myself and my business
partner, who worked with me then) as the Laser Bread Slicer (that, we figured, was the extent of
its accuracy).
So, typical tech support goes something like "See the edit box labeled 'Fudge Factor'? Try
entering 203 insead of 198 and see if that fixes it."
Thanks man...I thought I had successfully repressed those memories
|
|
|
|
|
As has been said, the number you pass to Sleep() is just a request. Your thread might not wake up for a minute if some high-priority thread grabs the CPU. Something more accurate than Sleep() seems to be in order, check out multimedia timers and waitable timers.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, maybe a silly question but:
My resource file, each time it auto-generates, includes windows.h. I need it to include afxcmn.h instead. I can of course change it manually but then each time I use the resource editor the .rc file generates again with windows.h and overwrites the manual change to afxcmn.h. How do I fix this? It's saying Generated from the TEXTINCLUDE 2 resource, maybe I can find/edit that? I have no idea what it is.
Thanks!
KR
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok I got it to work, thanks.
KR
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having trouble adding inheritance into my program. First here is my code so far:
#include <GL/glut.h><br />
<br />
class Character<br />
{<br />
protected:<br />
int width, height;<br />
int tileX, tileY;<br />
float x, y;<br />
float speed;<br />
public:<br />
Character(float xPos, float yPos);<br />
Character();<br />
~Character();<br />
void draw();<br />
void move(int direction);<br />
float getX();<br />
float getY();<br />
};<br />
<br />
#include "Character.h"<br />
<br />
Character::Character(float xPos, float yPos)<br />
{<br />
width = 50;<br />
height = 50;<br />
x = xPos;<br />
y = yPos;<br />
speed = 0.5;<br />
}<br />
<br />
Character::Character()<br />
{<br />
}<br />
<br />
void Character::draw()<br />
{<br />
glColor3f(1.0, 0.0, 0.0);<br />
glPushMatrix();<br />
glTranslatef(x,y,0);<br />
glBegin(GL_QUADS);<br />
glVertex2d(0, 0);<br />
glVertex2d(0, height);<br />
glVertex2d(width, height);<br />
glVertex2d(width, 0);<br />
glEnd();<br />
glPopMatrix();<br />
}<br />
<br />
void Character::move(int direction)<br />
{<br />
if (direction == 2)<br />
{<br />
x -= speed;<br />
}<br />
else if (direction == 1)<br />
{<br />
x += speed;<br />
}<br />
else if (direction == 3)<br />
{<br />
y += speed;<br />
}<br />
else<br />
{<br />
y -= speed;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
float Character::getX()<br />
{<br />
return x;<br />
}<br />
<br />
float Character::getY()<br />
{<br />
return y;<br />
}<br />
<br />
#include <GL/glut.h><br />
#include "Character.h"<br />
<br />
class Alien : public Character<br />
{<br />
public:<br />
Alien(float xPos, float yPos);<br />
};<br />
<br />
#include "Alien.h"<br />
<br />
Alien::Alien(float xPos, float yPos)<br />
{<br />
width = 50;<br />
height = 50;<br />
x = xPos;<br />
y = yPos;<br />
speed = 0.1;<br />
}<br />
I thought this was adequate to get Alien to inherit all of the methods of Character, but I get the following errors:
error C2011: 'Character' : 'class' type redefinition
error C2504: 'Character' : base class undefined
error C2039: 'draw' : is not a member of 'Player'
error C2039: 'draw' : is not a member of 'Alien'
and so on. Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to add the precompiler directive at the top of your header files so that they are included only once:
#ifndef MYFILE_H
#define MYFILE_H
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
Ah this fixed it. May I ask what these lines actually do? I've seen these a few times.
|
|
|
|
|
They just prevent that your header file is included several time (thus avoiding a redefinition of an existing class).
Basically, when you do an include, the precompiler will replace the include directive by the contents of the included file. Thus, in certain condition it can happen that you include the same file from different files (if two files include the same file and they are both included in another file).
|
|
|
|
|
I think your problem is that Character.h is being included more than once. Generally, header files are wrapped in something like
#ifndef CharacterClassInclusionGuard
#define CharacterClassInclusionGuard
class Character ( etc)
#endif
What's the other include you have in the header ? Is it stdafx.h ? That should be in the cpp.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
To complete Cedric and Christian answers, there's a Microsoft specific precompiler command that does the same thing, plus an additional check that permits a file not to be inserted (at least tried to be inserted) twice.
at the beginning of the header file you write, you can instead write this :
#pragma once
and that's all.
but don't forget it's microsoft specific, so if you plan to port your code to any other compiler, prefer using the other syntax
|
|
|
|
|
I’m making my first dive into what I’ve heard called “functionoids” or “functoids” (function pointer flexibility without the ‘static’ limitations). So far, so good…
All of the included code works great; that is, until I attempt to access members of the class Foo via a call to my “function pointer”. The ‘this’ pointer allows access to members of Foo::func1; ok fine, that makes perfect sense. But I want to reference members of Foo from the “functionoid” and don’t know how.
What am I missing?
Foo.h:
class Functionoid
{
public:
virtual void go() {}
};
class Foo
{
public:
void MainProc();
bool var;
class func1 : public Functionoid
{
public:
virtual void go();
};
};
Foo.cpp:
#include "Foo.h"
Foo::func1::go()
{
if (this->var)
0;
}
void Foo::MainProc()
{
Functionoid* pf1 = new func1;
pf1->go();
delete pf1;
}
-- modified at 15:37 Tuesday 13th February, 2007
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
