|
Just call Application.Run again, I would have thought.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Hi this is a simple question. How should I go about subclassing a control in .Net.
I know I can just inherit from the parent class I want like MyClass : ParentControl but after this step I'm not sure in which direction to proceed.
I added the control in my Toolbox, but I can't add it on a screen. My guess is I'm missing something. Like maybe a method I must absolutly override or something.
Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're say inheriting from a control that you can just drop onto the form then there's no need to override anything just to allow you to display it. It should work automatically.
I have no idea what I just said. But my intentions were sincere.
|
|
|
|
|
Insert Cool Screen Name Here wrote: Any help would be appreciated.
Google can help: MSDN C# subclass windows forms
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
If you derive from an existing control, it iwll work exactly like the existing one, until you add methods. Try adding an instance of the base class with the designer, and hand change the code to make it the derived class.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All
Does anyone know any good alternatives for source control of .Net applications other than Visual Source Safe
Thanks a lot
Regards,
Happy
|
|
|
|
|
How about Sourcegear's Vault[^]
I've used it before and it is pretty good. Much better than VSS.
|
|
|
|
|
check SourceGear. It blows VSS away.
|
|
|
|
|
VSTS rocks ( but is expensive ).
Evolution is pretty good. Some people swear by CVS, I hate it. Try googling for source control - truth is, the fact that your app is .NET is irrelevant to a source control system.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Try Source Gear Vault[^]. Been using it almost a year now. Interface looks like source safe, but works better. Repository is SQL Server DB, although I'm pretty sure you can use other RDBMS. Works great over internet as well. Several of us work from home and Source Safe was a huge pain. No problems now.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Miller wrote: Try Source Gear Vault[^]. Been ... Works great over internet as well. Several of us work from home and Source Safe was a huge pain. No problems now.
Absolutely agree. It is a fantastic product for distributed teams.
|
|
|
|
|
As you want to do this 'in the browser', the ASP.NET forum is really the place to ask, or perhaps the Web Dev forum ? The .NET Framework forum doesn't get a lot of traffic.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
My advice would be in this case:
1. Don't go to far with the graphics in the user interface. The fancier the looks the more data the user will need to download from the server. There's another reason for not doing too much graphics, it consumes more memory and CPU to render.
2. Don't load too much into memory, but don't load too little into memory either. This is a hard one, as you have to balance between more CPU power and less memory or more memory and less CPU power. Typically you need more memory if you load a lot of data and don't use paging. On the other hand paging increases CPU usage as you have to get data from the datastore every time your user switches pages.
To measure the performance, you need something like ants profiler. Also I recommend you actively use FxCop to get best results out of the .NET framework.
Hope this helps 
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
"You can always try to smash it with a wrench to fix that. It might actually work" - WillemM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
what is shawdoing? what is the difference b/w over loading & shadowing?
i read this in mSDN but i am still confused with this concept.
please can anyone explain me what is this Shadowing?
Thanks in advance
Rahi
If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
|
|
|
|
|
By overloading a method you get an alternative for that method. By shadowing a method you simply hide the other version of the method and it becomes inaccessable.
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
"You can always try to smash it with a wrench to fix that. It might actually work" - WillemM
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks now i got to know what Shadowing is. When ever i post some question in this forum by expecting this type of answers but i am not receiving exact response from the forum members. They are asking to read from the sites and books etc., they are correct. Atleast they are showing me the way but after reading from the book only i am posting my questions here. Some times i got struck (hang-up) with some topics may be they are very simple. as i am new to this technology..i need simple explaination like what u dropped here for shadowing....
Thanks once again for ur response.
Rahi
If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
|
|
|
|
|
Overloading can occur with in the same class too, for eg:
<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b)<br />
{<br />
return a+b;<br />
}<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b, int c)<br />
{<br />
return a+b+c;<br />
}<br />
Method Hiding can happen only when inheritance comes to picture
<br />
public class Maths<br />
{<br />
public Maths()<br />
{<br />
}<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b)<br />
{<br />
return a+b;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
public class TwoMaths : Maths<br />
{<br />
public TwoMaths()<br />
{<br />
}<br />
<br />
public int addnumbers(int a, int b)<br />
{<br />
return a+b;<br />
}<br />
<br />
}<br />
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for ur response. really ur example is very simple and clear. this will be a very good example for those candidates(like me) who are new to this .net technology i came to know what shadowing is with ur's and willem's explanation.
now i can read some more about shadowing from books & Sites.
Thanks once again,
Rahi
If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything,
If you look at what you have in life, you have everything... "
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Can an application deployed with Click Once allow the user to browse and select a file from the file system? From my research I think this is possible but have not found exactly what needs to be done.
If you have worked with Click Once in the past I'd really like to hear about your experience. It sounds like an interesting way to give internal (Intranet) users a better UI experience. I'm especially interested in the security limitations or what must be done to work within them.
Thanks for the help.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because there's not anything that you need a DataBinding for in these controls, if you want to store the data from these, then you would use a database. The reason that you have to do it that way is because there may be times when there's more data than what can stored via a DataBinding.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
code_wiz wrote: Hmm, then going by what you said, is there any reason why MS supports DataBinding in controls such as ComboBox control????
Because a ComboBox is used to select an item. ListViews and TreeViews more often used to organize/view options.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
There was no easy way at the time to handle the millions of different possibilities of hierarchical data. I'm guessing it was easier at the time to let the programmer take care of things and hope for something better.
Thankfully this has been solved with the introduction of WPF.
I have no idea what I just said. But my intentions were sincere.
|
|
|
|
|
hamid
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
