|
I am going to take your advice, and do this. If I stick the Invoke check right in the handler itself, that should cover any subsequent chains of methods called?
Also - can you explain what you are doing in the Invoke method here? I want to make sure I know what is going on. It looks like you are passing a new instance of the handler?
And finally, do you think the odd behavior in RELEASE is caused by this? And why, under VSHOST, am I not seeing Exceptions thrown (you know, this control was accessed by a thread that didn't create it, that sort of thing)?
Thanks for the help, this has been educational.
|
|
|
|
|
You were right, this fixes every one of the problems I mentioned. You are my personal hero, until my next question.
I still don't understand why "wrong thread" exceptions weren't thrown.
|
|
|
|
|
I was just finishing up an explanation of the Invoke() method and its use when my laptop decided to stage a temporary strike. 
When you call Invoke(), you generally pass two things. The first is the method that should be invoked on the UI thread. It's often convenient to simply pass the method currently executing since the method we want executed on the UI thread will usually have the same signature anyway. The InvokeRequired check prevents an infinite recursion. The second argument passed is a collection of arguments to pass to the method to be executed on the UI thread. If we're "recursively" calling the same method, we just pass an object array with the arguments that the method was given in the first place. (If the list of arguments passed to Invoke() don't match the signature of the method passed to Invoke(), an exception will be thrown.)
The Invoke() method will then place a special message into the application's message queue and wait for it to be picked up and processed by the application's message pump operating on the UI thread. The message contains the method to be called and the arguments to pass to the method. The UI thread will eventually get to and process the message. As the message is processed, the UI thread will execute the specified method and pass it the specified arguments. When the method exits, the UI thread moves on to the next message in the queue and the original caller of Invoke() is notified and allowed to continue.
Finally, a lot of the confusion surrounding the use of Invoke() is exactly what you're seeing. Sometimes (often times) everything works just fine even though the UI is being updated from all manner and number of worker threads. Then you find the right scenario and everything just *stops* for no apparent reason. (I had written one application that ran for days on end when left minimized but would immediately lock up when the first event arrived while the user was actually looking at the form.) I've noticed that Visual Studio 2005 has an improved debugger that will actually (in certain situations and when configured to do so) throw exceptions in this situation so that the problem is more apparent to the developer.
-Phil
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks again. I figured out the delegation eventually, and I did find link to Control.Invoke at
ms-help://MS.VSExpressCC.v80/MS.NETFramework.v20.en/cpref17/html/P_System_Windows_Forms_Control_InvokeRequired.htm
It's the InvokeRequired page. That's the only one you can get to from the Index!
Too bad this thread is buried under my "find me a COM object" heading. It's very instructional, I hope others can find it.
Makes me wonder if I shouldn't just wrap every method in an InvokeRequired check.
In fact, it's interesting that InvokeRequired is always there, and it makes me wonder why .NET doesn't simply do the right thing if it knows delegation is required. I have seen the "wrong thread" exception thrown occasionally, in much more subtle circumstances, I'm surprised it's not being thrown here.
Thanks again for the edumacation.
|
|
|
|
|
My guess would be that there is a slight performance penalty with using InvokeRequired. While it may be meaningless for the relatively few event handlers that end-users will call it from, to use it within every .NET library method and property that might ever be called by a user would probably have a more measurable, cumulative impact on performance. Making its use explicit allows the developer to make the appropriate call between safety and performance.
-Phil
|
|
|
|
|
One last question. The only API I'm using with multiple passed objects is this:
void itunes_OnDatabaseChangedEvent(object deletedObjectIDs, object changedObjectIDs)
How do I write the Invoke statement for this? If I pass both objects to new object[], then to access them from the Invoked iteration will require different code than the non invoked iteration.
Do I need to write an overloaded itunes_OnDatabaseChangedEvent() ?
|
|
|
|
|
You would do something like this:
<br />
void itunes_OnDatabaseChangedEvent(object deletedObjectIDs, object changedObjectIDs)<br />
{<br />
if (InvokeRequired)<br />
{<br />
Invoke(new _OnDatabaseChangedEventHandler(itunes_OnDatabaseChangedEvent), new object[] { deletedObjectIDs, changedObjectIDs });<br />
}<br />
else<br />
{<br />
}<br />
}<br />
You create an object array with the arguments in the same order in which the method to be executed on the UI thread expects them. The Invoke() method takes care of pulling the array apart and passing them to the method. (The method called never sees the array; it's just a generic way to pass the arguments to Invoke().)
-Phil
|
|
|
|
|
I figured that out right after I clicked Post...  It occurred to me that Invoke would be smart enough to call the delegate with the correct number of arguments.
You should write an article on handling COM events and the Invoke method. You have explained it well.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
you discovered Controls are not thread-safe, and can be only handled coreectly by the
UI thread. Using InvokeRequired and Invoke supports this, but needs the programmer's action.
Having it done automatically could result in terrible performance:
the method you Invoke ends up in a queue, waiting for the UI thread to
become ready to handle it.
So it is the designer/programmer's responsibility to decide which piece of code should
execute on which thread. Imagine a method with a for-loop that updates some Control
(say all items in a ListBox). Rather than having the control do its own Invoke,
a proper design would have the etnire method run on the UI thread, involving only
one Invoke.
This is a design issue. Something similar is true about locking in a multi-threaded
environment (independent of COntrols); locks must be there by design, and
not be inserted automatically.
Luc Pattyn
|
|
|
|
|
No, this hat is the newest, in fact. Can you explain what is happening in the Invoke statement?
Weird, MSDN says this about the Invoke method:
This method is for access to managed classes from unmanaged code, and should not be called from managed code. For more information about IDispatch::Invoke, see the MSDN Library.
Aren't we calling it from managed code?
|
|
|
|
|
My fault, MSDN was describing "_AppDomain.Invoke". Note that MSDN doesn't have a description of Control.Invoke.
And people wonder why newbies like me pound on things.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible write a virus program in c#, if it is, can any one give me an example
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler45 wrote: Is it possible write a virus program in c#, if it is, can any one give me an example
Treading into dangerous territory with this question, but a proof-of-concept virus-like program has already been written in C#. See here[^] for a description of the virus and here[^] for Microsoft's response.
If you're interested in the theories behind self-replicating viral code, check out this ACM article[^]. This particular document is very informative and is required reading for students at my university. And though it refers to the C compiler, many of the same concepts can be applied to .NET languages.
-- modified at 22:53 Thursday 4th January, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Process.Start("format c: /u");
Be sure to debug that code!
|
|
|
|
|
It's possible to write anything you like. The question is, why would you want to ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for your all, i need to know that how can antivirus programs understand that it is a virus, for ex. if i write a .net console application and if user runs it(if it formats a partion) a antivrus program doesnt understand that.
I wish to explain what i need to know,
thanks again
Best Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler45 wrote: how can antivirus programs understand that it is a virus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-virus[^] wikipedia link explains that most av software uses a dictionary of known viruses. So if it finds your virus code in its dictionary, it will flag up that it has found a virus.
The EICAR test virus is an example used to ensure that av software is working correctly (using the dictionary method)
X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*
The above code is the virus sig of the EICAR virus. Copy it into a notepad and call save it as test.com (not test.com.txt!) and you av sw should detect it.
Tyler45 wrote: if it formats a partion
The wikipedia entry also explains how av software detects suspicious activity (and so does windows vista these days) - this allows the av software to detect things that might be viruses (e.g. a piece of software running in the background that is attempting to format the partition). You'll have to check your av software to find out if it does this.
I hope that helps with a bit of background. I won't wish you luck writing your virus in c#, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Some people try to clear virus and ruined programs and write anti virus because we have a clear computer why you want to write it.
|
|
|
|
|
i need to know background programming, how can a process run in background and, it doesnt need click to run
|
|
|
|
|
You would typically write it as a Windows Service (assuming that it's the AV that you are talking about here).
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Cool score of 1
Does that mean, that there are questions which shouldn't be asked? That would be very strange!
SkyWalker
|
|
|
|
|
Just remember curiosty kills the cat. Or in these days the cat get skinned, tared and feathered, and thrown in jail with a big guy named Bubba.
Programmer: A biological machine designed to convert caffeine into code. * Developer: A person who develops working systems by writing and using software.
[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
I am printing some text in my print preview. It prints perfectly fine. Now what i want is to get the Y position of the last chacacter of the string. Once i get the Y position of the last character I want to add some more characters on the postion of (Y+10). Is that posible to do. I would appreciate your favor.
For instance:
This is the my frist string. (I want to get the "." position). If lets say "." is 50.
I want to add a new line base on the Y postion of the "." so it's gonna be 50+10 for me to add next set of string on the position
private void printDocument1_PrintPage(object sender, PrintPageEventArgs e)
{
int charactersOnPage = 0;
int linesPerPage = 0;
e.Graphics.MeasureString(stringToPrint, this.Font,
e.MarginBounds.Size, StringFormat.GenericTypographic,
out charactersOnPage, out linesPerPage);
e.Graphics.DrawString(stringToPrint, this.Font, Brushes.Black,
e.MarginBounds, StringFormat.GenericTypographic);
stringToPrint = stringToPrint.Substring(charactersOnPage);
e.HasMorePages = (stringToPrint.Length > 0);
}
|
|
|
|
|
MeasureString on the Graphics object will tell you how many pixels the string will take up, so you can work it out from there.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried for a while to get a progressbar embedded within a listview, but just have one problem. If you resize the column that the progressbar is in so that it can fill the whole row, then the progressbar doesn't resize correctly when the scrollbar is moved. See the picture below. This only happens for columnindex > 0
This is the code I am using
protected override void OnDrawSubItem(DrawListViewSubItemEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Item.GetType() == typeof(MyListViewItem))
{
MyListViewItem item = (MyListViewItem)e.Item;
if (item.Bars.ContainsKey(e.ColumnIndex))
{
e.DrawDefault = false;
if (e.ColumnIndex > 0)
{
int runningTotal = 0;
for (int i = e.ColumnIndex - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(e.ColumnIndex);
runningTotal += this.Columns[i].Width;
}
runningTotal += e.Item.Bounds.Left;
item.Bars[e.ColumnIndex].Location = new System.Drawing.Point(runningTotal, e.Bounds.Location.Y);
item.Bars[e.ColumnIndex].Width = this.Columns[e.ColumnIndex].Width;
item.Bars[e.ColumnIndex].Height = e.Bounds.Size.Height;
}
else
{
int clientBound = e.Item.Bounds.Left;
item.Bars[e.ColumnIndex].Location = new System.Drawing.Point(clientBound, e.Bounds.Location.Y);
item.Bars[e.ColumnIndex].Width = this.Columns[e.ColumnIndex].Width;
item.Bars[e.ColumnIndex].Height = e.Bounds.Size.Height;
}
}
else
e.DrawDefault = true;
}
else
e.DrawDefault = true;
base.OnDrawSubItem(e);
}
I have also overridden "OnColumnWidthChanging" to resize the bars when the column width changes, and also overridden WndProc to try and catch the scrollbars being moved, although that didn't work, so I'm assuming the problem lies in the code section for if(e.ColumnIndex > 0)
Thanks in advance ~ Jamie
P.S. - the image. The scrollbar should be in the "newcol" column.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v635/slugonamission/Problem.jpg
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
