|
Thank you Robert and Guffa. So Assembly is the key in this scenario.
Got it working.
---
Harsh Gupta
|
|
|
|
|
hgupta1983 wrote: If I make it internal, then I could even call it's constructor from Main method(in C#) or New Sub (in VB), which I am trying to avoid!!
Then don't put it in the same assembly as the main program.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry to ask this question here  I need simple answer yes or no
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect your question will be reflected to the proper forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Private variables do not exist. They're just an on-going joke started by some OO wackos.
|
|
|
|
|
But when we watch those variables in VS.NET, we do see those variables. For example check m_roles in GenericPrincipal object.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a joke reply, about all you will get to a programming question asked in the lounge.
Christian Graus - C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Great  ..U R Master Of OO
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okies... please move this
|
|
|
|
|
Well, while I move this to the .NET forum, you could write some code and see for yourself...
Christian Graus - C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I first try .. then ask the question!
|
|
|
|
|
My reply to you is stored in a private variable. Maybe you can use reflection to discover (or maybe not  ).
Jesus is Love! Tell to someone! ![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
I have a panel with 2 buttons and it has to be possible for user, resize the buttons. (Prog. language: C#)
Do you have some tipps for me?
|
|
|
|
|
Does the 1.1 framework run on NT4 server? The MS support documetns don't seem to differentiate between the server and workstation versions of NT4, while they do for newer OSes. My app has been tested using NT4 workstation, but I don't have access to an NT4 Server install to test against.
--
Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.
|
|
|
|
|
I seem to recall that NT4 WS and server used exactly the same code base, just different "tuning". Supposedly if one knew all the registry keys involved, one could even convert one to the other. That may explain why Microsoft doesn't differentiate compatiblility in this case...
|
|
|
|
|
That would make sense, in a grotesque twisted microsoftian manor :P
--
Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
is there any way to create multiple virtaul com ports on a single com port eg(com1)
and to read and write on those particular virtual com port at the same time
hello
|
|
|
|
|
I never seen virtual COM ports on a single hardware COM port. I've seen them on A/D cards that control multiple devices, but not through a real COM port.
I don't think you can do this. Since you can only attach one piece of hardware to a serial port at any one time, what's the point of this? You'd have to attach multiple devices through some kind of multiplexor. This device would have to be able to communicate with a custom serial port driver on the hardware COM port so that the correct signals would go to the correct device and the correct replies would be sent to the appropriate applications.
Why would you want to do this?
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
thanks
i have to attatch multiple access lock controlls on my serial port which open the door after validatin that visitor from data base ,, this access controler got a function which sents the rfid card's serial number on com port ,,, but since there are multiple doors and multiple acces lock devices(each device for one door) and we have to use multi threading to read and respond from all of those devices at the same time .,,
is there any way ,
hello
|
|
|
|
|
You'd normally use a multi-port serial card for this. I've seen them with as many as 16 ports on them. I hope all your doors are within range of a serial ports transmission limits. It's not like you're running over Ethernet or anything. IIRC, you've got to keep the two devices within, at most, 200 line-feet of the PC. Maybe more, maybe less, depending on the power output of the serial ports and the quality of cabling your using.
You'd be better off using something that's Ethernet based for many reasons, not the least of which is expandability.
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: IIRC, you've got to keep the two devices within, at most, 200 line-feet of the PC. Maybe more, maybe less, depending on the power output of the serial ports and the quality of cabling your using.
With low baudrates and very high quality cables you can get a few thousand feet even in industrial locations with severe electric noise problems. IIRC you need to use optical isolators and powered signal boosters to do that though.
--
Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.
|
|
|
|
|
It's been so long since I've done any serial port work, I can hardly remember anything! 
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
